Our approach to the Sandia Verification and Validation Challenge Problem is to use probability bounds analysis (PBA) based on probabilistic representation for aleatory uncertainties and interval representation for (most) epistemic uncertainties. The nondeterministic model predictions thus take the form of p-boxes, or bounding cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) that contain all possible families of CDFs that could exist within the uncertainty bounds. The scarcity of experimental data provides little support for treatment of all uncertain inputs as purely aleatory uncertainties and also precludes significant calibration of the models. We instead seek to estimate the model form uncertainty at conditions where the experimental data are available, then extrapolate this uncertainty to conditions where no data exist. The modified area validation metric (MAVM) is employed to estimate the model form uncertainty which is important because the model involves significant simplifications (both geometric and physical nature) of the true system. The results of verification and validation processes are treated as additional interval-based uncertainties applied to the nondeterministic model predictions based on which the failure prediction is made. Based on the method employed, we estimate the probability of failure to be as large as 0.0034, concluding that the tanks are unsafe.
Probability Bounds Analysis Applied to the Sandia Verification and Validation Challenge Problem
Manuscript received February 8, 2015; final manuscript received July 31, 2015; published online February 19, 2016. Guest Editor: Kenneth Hu.
Choudhary, A., Voyles, I. T., Roy, C. J., Oberkampf, W. L., and Patil, M. (February 19, 2016). "Probability Bounds Analysis Applied to the Sandia Verification and Validation Challenge Problem." ASME. J. Verif. Valid. Uncert. March 2016; 1(1): 011003. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031285
Download citation file: