This effort focuses on the comparison of unsteadiness due to as-measured turbine blades in a transonic turbine to that obtained with blueprint geometries via computational fluid dynamics (CFD). A Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes flow solver with the two-equation Wilcox turbulence model is used as the numerical analysis tool for comparison between the blueprint geometries and as-manufactured geometries obtained from a structured light optical measurement system. The nominal turbine CFD grid data defined for analysis of the blueprint blade were geometrically modified to reflect as-manufactured turbine blades using an established mesh metamorphosis algorithm. The approach uses a modified neural network to iteratively update the source mesh to the target mesh. In this case, the source is the interior CFD surface grid while the target is the surface blade geometry obtained from the optical scanner. Nodes interior to the CFD surface were updated using a modified iterative spring analogy to avoid grid corruption when matching as-manufactured part geometry. This approach avoids the tedious manual approach of regenerating the CFD grid and does not rely on geometry obtained from coordinate measurement machine (CMM) sections, but rather a point cloud representing the entirety of the turbine blade. Surface pressure traces and the discrete Fourier transforms (DFT) thereof from numerical predictions of as-measured geometries are then compared both to blueprint predictions and to experimental measurements. The importance of incorporating as-measured geometries in analyses to explain deviations between numerical predictions of blueprint geometries and experimental results is readily apparent. Further analysis of every casting produced in the creation of the test turbine yields variations that one can expect in both aero-performance and unsteady loading as a consequence of manufacturing tolerances. Finally, the use of measured airfoil geometries to reduce the unsteady load on a target blade in a region of interest is successfully demonstrated.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research-Article
The Effect of Manufacturing Variations on Unsteady Interaction in a Transonic Turbine
John P. Clark,
John P. Clark
Mem. ASME
Turbomachinery Branch,
Turbine Engine Division,
Aerospace Systems Directorate,
Air Force Research Laboratory,
1864 4th Street,
Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433
e-mail: john.clark.38@us.af.mil
Turbomachinery Branch,
Turbine Engine Division,
Aerospace Systems Directorate,
Air Force Research Laboratory,
1864 4th Street,
Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433
e-mail: john.clark.38@us.af.mil
Search for other works by this author on:
Joseph A. Beck,
Joseph A. Beck
Mem. ASME
AFRL/RXMS,
Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433
AFRL/RXMS,
Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433
Search for other works by this author on:
Alex A. Kaszynski,
Alex A. Kaszynski
Mem. ASME
Universal Technology Co.,
Dayton, OH 54532
Universal Technology Co.,
Dayton, OH 54532
Search for other works by this author on:
Angela Still,
Angela Still
Mem. ASME
Universal Technology Co.,
Dayton, OH 54532
Universal Technology Co.,
Dayton, OH 54532
Search for other works by this author on:
Ron-Ho Ni
Ron-Ho Ni
Mem. ASME
AeroDynamic Solutions, Inc.,
Danville, CA 94526
AeroDynamic Solutions, Inc.,
Danville, CA 94526
Search for other works by this author on:
John P. Clark
Mem. ASME
Turbomachinery Branch,
Turbine Engine Division,
Aerospace Systems Directorate,
Air Force Research Laboratory,
1864 4th Street,
Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433
e-mail: john.clark.38@us.af.mil
Turbomachinery Branch,
Turbine Engine Division,
Aerospace Systems Directorate,
Air Force Research Laboratory,
1864 4th Street,
Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433
e-mail: john.clark.38@us.af.mil
Joseph A. Beck
Mem. ASME
AFRL/RXMS,
Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433
AFRL/RXMS,
Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433
Alex A. Kaszynski
Mem. ASME
Universal Technology Co.,
Dayton, OH 54532
Universal Technology Co.,
Dayton, OH 54532
Angela Still
Mem. ASME
Universal Technology Co.,
Dayton, OH 54532
Universal Technology Co.,
Dayton, OH 54532
Ron-Ho Ni
Mem. ASME
AeroDynamic Solutions, Inc.,
Danville, CA 94526
AeroDynamic Solutions, Inc.,
Danville, CA 94526
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received October 23, 2017; final manuscript received November 27, 2017; published online April 30, 2018. Editor: Kenneth Hall. This work is in part a work of the U.S. Government. ASME disclaims all interest in the U.S. Government's contributions.
J. Turbomach. May 2018, 140(6): 061007 (9 pages)
Published Online: April 30, 2018
Article history
Received:
October 23, 2017
Revised:
November 27, 2017
Citation
Clark, J. P., Beck, J. A., Kaszynski, A. A., Still, A., and Ni, R. (April 30, 2018). "The Effect of Manufacturing Variations on Unsteady Interaction in a Transonic Turbine." ASME. J. Turbomach. May 2018; 140(6): 061007. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039361
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
Investigation of Unsteady Flow Phenomena in First Vane Caused by Combustor Flow With Swirl
J. Turbomach (April,2017)
Effects of Hot Streak and Airfoil Clocking on Heat Transfer and Aerodynamic Characteristics in Gas Turbine
J. Turbomach (February,2016)
Adjoint-Based Sensitivity Analysis for Unsteady Bladerow Interaction Using Space–Time Gradient Method
J. Turbomach (November,2017)
A Single Formulation for Uncertainty Propagation in Turbomachinery: SAMBA PC
J. Turbomach (November,2017)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Outlook
Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines: Operating Experience and Future Potential
Control and Operational Performance
Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines: Operating Experience and Future Potential
Performance Testing of Combined Cycle Power Plant
Handbook for Cogeneration and Combined Cycle Power Plants, Second Edition