The demand of further increased bypass ratios for turbofan engines will lead to low pressure turbines with larger diameter and lower rotational speed in conventional high-bypass aeroengine architectures. Due to that, it is necessary to guide the flow leaving the high pressure turbine to the low pressure turbine at a larger diameter without any severe loss generating separation or flow disturbances. To reduce costs and weight this turbine duct has to be as short as possible. This results in superaggressive (very high diffusion) S-shaped geometries where the boundary layers are not able to withstand the strong adverse pressure gradient, which results in flow separation. This paper describes the flow through a fully separated duct as a baseline configuration. In a next step the influence of passive flow control devices onto this separation has been investigated. Therefore, low-profile vortex generators were applied within the first bend of this S-shaped intermediate turbine diffuser in order to energize the boundary layer and further reduce or even suppress the occurring separation. This configuration was investigated downstream a transonic turbine stage. Measurements were performed by means of five-hole-probes, static wall pressure taps, and oil flow visualization at the duct endwalls. For a better understanding of the flow behavior the vortex generators were also investigated in a two-dimensional rectangular S-shaped duct using the same Mach number level. Results showed that the vortex generators reduce the separation in the 2D-duct but have no distinct influence on the separation within the turbine duct due to wakes as well as strong secondary flow effects.

1.
Norris
,
G.
, and
Dominy
,
R. G.
, 1997, “
Diffusion Rate Influences on Inter-Turbine Diffusers
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A
0957-6509,
211
, pp.
235
242
.
2.
Dominy
,
R G.
,
Kirkham
,
D. A.
, 1996, “
The Influence of Blade Wakes on the Performance of Interturbine Diffusers
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
118
(
2
), pp.
347
352
.
3.
Göttlich
,
E.
,
Marn
,
A.
,
Malzacher
,
F.
, and
Heitmeir
,
F.
, 2009, “
On Flow Separation in a Super-Aggressive Intermediate Turbine Duct
,”
Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference on Turbomachinery Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics
, p.
1389
-
1404
.
4.
Göttlich
,
E.
,
Marn
,
A.
,
Malzacher
,
F. J.
,
Schennach
,
O.
, and
Heitmeir
,
F.
, 2007, “
Experimental Investigation of the Flow Through an Aggressive Intermediate Turbine Duct Downstream of a Transonic Turbine Stage
,”
Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Turbomachinery Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics
, p.
383
-
395
.
5.
Marn
,
A.
,
Göttlich
,
E.
,
Malzacher
,
F.
, and
Heitmeir
,
F.
, 2009, “
Comparison Between the Flow Through an Aggressive and a Super-Aggressive Intermediate Turbine Duct
,” AIAA Paper No. ISABE-2009-1259.
6.
Bailey
,
D. W.
,
Britchford
,
K. M.
,
Carrotte
,
J. F.
, and
Stevens
S. J.
, 1997, “
Performance Assessment of an Annular S-Shaped Duct
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
119
(
1
), pp.
149
156
.
7.
Lin
,
J. C.
,
Howard
,
F.
, and
Selby
,
G.
, 1989, “
Turbulent Flow Separation Control Through Passive Techniques
,” AIAA Paper No. 89-0976.
8.
Lin
,
J. C.
, 2002, “
Review of Research on Low-Profile Vortex Generators to Control Boundary Layer Separation
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
0376-0421,
38
, pp.
389
420
.
9.
Göttlich
,
E.
,
Malzacher
,
F.
,
Heitmeir
,
F.
, and
Marn
,
A.
, 2005, “
Adaptation of a Transonic Test Turbine Facility for Experimental Investigation of Aggressive Intermediate Turbine Duct Flows
,” AIAA Paper ISABE-2005-1132.
10.
Erhard
,
J.
, and
Gehrer
,
A.
, 2000, “
Design and Construction of a Transonic Test Turbine Facility
,”
ASME
Paper No. 2000-GT-480.
11.
Neumayer
,
F.
,
Kulhanek
,
G.
,
Pirker
,
H. P.
,
Jericha
H.
,
Seyr
,
A.
, and
Sanz
,
W.
, 2001, “
Operational Behaviour of a Complex Transonic Test Turbine Facility
,”
ASME
Paper No. 2001-GT-489.
12.
Göttlich
,
E.
,
Marn
,
A.
,
Pecnik
,
R.
,
Malzacher
,
F. J.
,
Schennach
,
O.
, and
Pirker
,
H. P.
, 2007, “
The Influence of Blade Tip Variation on the Flow Through an Aggressive S-shaped Intermediate Turbine Duct Downstream a Transonic Turbine Stage—Part II: Time-Resolved Results and Surface Flow
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT 2007-28069.
13.
Sovran
,
G.
, and
Klomp
,
E. D.
, 1967, “
Experimentally Determined Optimum Geometries for Rectilinear Diffusers With Rectangular Conical or Annular Cross Section
,”
Fluid Mechanics of Internal Flow
,
G.
Sovran
, ed.,
Elsevier
,
New York
.
14.
Wallin
,
F.
, and
Eriksson
,
L. -E.
, 2008, “
Design of an Aggressive Flow-Controlled Turbine Duct
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2008-51202.
15.
Zunino
,
P.
, 2007, private communication.
16.
Canepa
,
E.
,
Lengani
,
D.
,
Satta
,
F.
,
Spano
,
E.
,
Ubaldi
,
M.
, and
Zunino
,
P.
, 2006, “
Boundary Layer Separation on a Flat Plate With Adverse Pressure Gradients Using Vortex Generators
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2006-90809.
You do not currently have access to this content.