Capturing a level of modeling of the flow inside a multistage turbomachine, such as unsteadiness for example, can be done at different levels of detail, either by capturing all deterministic features of the flow with a pure unsteady method or by settling for an approximated solution at a lower computational cost. The harmonic methods stand in this second category. Among them, the “nonlinear harmonic method” (NLHM) from He and Ning [1998, “Efficient Approach for Analysis of Unsteady Viscous Flows in Turbomachines,” AIAA J., 36, pp. 2005–2012] revealed the most efficient. This method consists of solving the fully nonlinear 3D steady problem and a linearized perturbation system in the frequency domain. As it has been shown by the authors that the circumferential variations exhibit a harmonic behavior, it is proposed here to adapt the NLHM to the throughflow model, where the main nonlinear system would be the common throughflow equations and the auxiliary system would give access to the circumferential stresses. As the numerical local explicit impermeability conditions are unsupported by Fourier series, the adaptation of this technique to the throughflow model relies on a reformulation of the blade effect by a smooth force field as in the “immersed boundary method” from Peskin [2002, “The Immersed Boundary Method,” Acta Numerica, 11, pp. 1–39]. A simple example of an inviscid flow around a cylinder will illustrate the preceding developments, bringing back the mean effect of the circumferential nonuniformities into the meridional flow.

1.
Adamczyk
,
J. J.
, 1984, “
Model Equation for Simulating Flows in Multistage Turbomachinery
,” NASA-TM-86869.
2.
He
,
L.
, and
Ning
,
W.
, 1998, “
Efficient Approach for Analysis of Unsteady Viscous Flows in Turbomachines
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
36
, pp.
2005
2012
.
3.
Chen
,
T.
,
Vasanthakumar
,
P.
, and
He
,
L.
, 2001, “
Analysis of Unsteady Blade Row Interaction Using Nonlinear Harmonic Approach
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
17
, pp.
651
658
.
4.
Stridh
,
M.
, and
Eriksson
,
L. E.
, 2005, “
Modeling Unsteady Flow Effects in a 3D Transonic Compressor
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2005-68149.
5.
Vilmin
,
S.
,
Lorrain
,
S.
,
Hirsch
,
C.
, and
Swoboda
,
S.
, 2006, “
Unsteady Flow Modeling Across the Rotor/Stator Interface Using the Nonlinear Harmonic Method
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2006-90210.
6.
Simon
,
J. -F.
,
Thomas
,
J. P.
, and
Léonard
,
O.
, 2009, “
On the Role of the Deterministic and Circumferential Stresses in Throughflow Calculations
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
131
(
3
), p.
031019
.
7.
Thomas
,
J. P.
,
Simon
,
J. F.
, and
Léonard
,
O.
, 2008, “
Investigating Circumferential Non-Uniformities in Throughflow Calculations Using a Harmonic Reconstruction
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2008-50328.
8.
Thomas
,
J. P.
, and
Léonard
,
O.
, 2010, “
Towards a High Order Throughflow. Part I: Investigating the Effectiveness of a Harmonic Reconstruction for 3D Flows
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2010-22841.
9.
Hall
,
K. C.
,
Thomas
,
J. P.
, and
Clark
,
W. S.
, 2002, “
Computation of Unsteady Nonlinear Flows in Cascades Using a Harmonic Balance Technique
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
40
, pp.
879
886
.
10.
McMullen
,
M.
,
Jameson
,
A.
, and
Alonso
,
J.
, 2006, “
Demonstration of Nonlinear Frequency Domain Methods
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
44
, pp.
1428
1435
.
11.
Peskin
,
C. S.
, 2002, “
The Immersed Boundary Method
,”
Acta Numerica
0962-4929,
11
, pp.
1
39
.
12.
Goldstein
,
D.
,
Handler
,
R.
, and
Sirovich
,
L.
, 1993, “
Modeling a No-Slip Flow Boundary With an External Force Field
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
0021-9991,
105
, pp.
354
366
.
13.
Khadra
,
K.
,
Angot
,
P.
,
Parneix
,
S.
, and
Caltagirone
,
J. -P.
, 2000, “
Fictitious Domain Approach for Numerical Modelling of Navier–Stokes Equations
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
0271-2091,
34
, pp.
651
684
.
14.
Mohd-Yusof
,
J.
, 1998, “
Development of Immersed Boundary Methods for Complex Geometries
,”
CTR Annual Research Briefs
,
Center for Turbulence Research
,
NASA Ames/Stanford University
, pp.
325
336
.
15.
Liu
,
Q.
, and
Vasilyev
,
O. V.
, 2007, “
A Brinkman Penalization Method for Compressible Flows in Complex Geometries
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
0021-9991,
227
, pp.
946
966
.
16.
Chiavassa
,
G.
, and
Donat
,
R.
, 2008, “
A Penalization Technique for the Efficient Computation of Compressible Fluid Flow With Obstacles
,”
Hyperbolic Problems: Theory, Numerics, Applications
,
Springer Berlin
,
Heidelberg
, pp.
89
100
.
17.
Keistler
,
P. G.
, 2008, “
An Immersed Boundary Method for Supersonic Flow
,”
Proceedings of the 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
, AIAA Paper No. 2008-529.
18.
Adamczyk
,
J. J.
,
Mulac
,
R. A.
, and
Celestina
,
M. L.
, 1986, “
A Model for Closing the Inviscid Form of the Averaged-Passage Equation System
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
108
, pp.
180
186
.
19.
Mittal
,
R.
, and
Iaccarino
,
G.
, 2005, “
Immersed Boundary Methods
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
0066-4189,
37
, pp.
239
261
.
20.
Billson
,
M.
,
Erilsson
,
L. E.
, and
Davidson
,
L.
, 2005, “
Acoustic Terms for the Linearized Euler Equations in Conservative Form
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
43
, pp.
752
759
.
You do not currently have access to this content.