This paper describes pressure measurements obtained for a modern one and one-half stage turbine. As part of the experimental effort, the position of the high-pressure turbine (HPT) vane was clocked relative to the downstream low-pressure turbine (LPT) vane to determine the influence of vane clocking on both the steady and unsteady pressure loadings on the LPT vane and the HPT blade. In addition, the axial location of the HPT vane relative to the HPT blade was changed to investigate the combined influence of vane/blade spacing and clocking on the unsteady pressure loading. Time-averaged and time-accurate surface-pressure results are presented for several spanwise locations on the vanes and blade. Results were obtained at four different HPT vane-clocking positions and at two different vane/blade axial spacings for three (of the four) clocking positions. For time-averaged results, the effect of clocking is small on the HPT blade and vane. The influence of clocking on the transition ducts and the LPT vane is slightly greater (on the order of ±1%). Reduced HPT vane/blade spacing has a larger effect than clocking on the HPT vanes and blades ±3% depending upon the particular surface. Examining the data at blade passing and the first fundamental frequency, the effect of spacing does not produce a dramatic influence on the relative changes that occur between clocking positions. The results demonstrate that clocking and spacing effects on the surface pressure loading are very complex and may introduce problems if the results of measurements or analysis made at one span or location in the machine are extrapolated to other sections.

1.
Huber
,
F. W.
,
Johnson
,
P. D.
,
Johnson
,
O. P.
,
Staubach
,
J. B.
, and
Gaddis
,
S. W.
,
1996
, “
Performance Improvement Through Indexing of Turbine Airfoils: Part I—Experimental Investigation
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
118
, pp.
630
635
.
2.
Griffin
,
L. W.
, and
Sharma
,
O. P.
,
1996
, “
Performance Improvement Through Indexing of Turbine Airfoils: Part 2-Numerical Simulation
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
118
, pp.
636
642
.
3.
Dorney, D. J., and Sharma, O. P., 1996, “A Study of Turbine Performance Increases Through Airfoil Clocking,” AIAA paper no. 96-2816.
4.
Dunn
,
M. G.
, and
Haldeman
,
C. W.
,
1995
, “
Phase-Resolved Surface Pressure and Heat-Transfer Measurements on the Blade of a Two-Stage Turbine
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
117
, pp.
653
658
.
5.
Dorney, D. J., and Gundy-Burlet, K., 1995, “Hot-Streak Clocking Effects in a 1-1/2 Stage Turbine,” ASME paper no. 95-GT-202.
6.
Barankiewicz, W. S., and Hathaway, M. D., “Effects of Stator Indexing on Performance in a Low Speed Multistage Axial Compressor,” ASME paper no. 97-GT-496.
7.
Hsu
,
S. T.
, and
Wo
,
A. M.
,
1998
, “
Reduction of Unsteady Blade Loading by Beneficial Use of Vortical and Potential Disturbances in an Axial compressor With Rotor Clocking
,”
J. Turbomach.
,
120
, pp.
705
713
.
8.
Hummel, F., 2001, “Wake-Wake Interactions and its Potential for Clocking in a Transonic High Pressure Turbine,” ASME paper no. 2001-GT-0302.
9.
Reinmoller, U., Stephan, B., Schmidt, S. and R. Niehuis, 2001, “Clocking Effects in a 1.5 Stage Axial turbine-Steady and Unsteady Experimental Investigations Supported by Numerical simulations” ASME paper no. 2001-GT-0304.
10.
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Bennett
,
W. A.
,
Delaney
,
R. A.
, and
Rao
,
K. V.
,
1992
, “
Investigation of Unsteady Flow Through a Transonic Turbine Stage: Data/Prediction Comparison for Time-Averaged and Phase-Resolved Pressure Data
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
114
, pp.
91
99
.
11.
Venable, B. L., Delaney, R. A., Busby, J. A., Davis, R. L., Dorney, D. J., Dunn, M. G., Haldeman, C. W., and Abhari, R. S., 1998, “Influence of Vane-Blade Spacing on Transonic Turbine Stage Aerodynamics, Part I: Time-Averaged Data and Analysis,” ASME paper no. 98-GT-481.
12.
Busby, J. A., Davis, R. L., Dorney, D. J., Dunn, M. G., Haldeman, C. W., Abhari, R. S., Venable, B. L., and Delaney, R. A., 1998, “Influence of Vane-Blade Spacing on Transonic Turbine Stage Aerodynamics Part II: Time Resolved Data and Analysis,” ASME paper no. 98-GT-482.
13.
Barter, J. W., Vitt, P. H., and Chen, J. P., 2000, “Interaction Effects in a Transonic Stage,” ASME paper no. 2000-GT-0376.
14.
Denos, R., Arts, T., Paniagua, G., Michelassi, V., and Martelli, F., 2000, “Investigation of the Unsteady Rotor Aerodynamics in a Transonic Turbine Stage,” ASME paper no. 2000-GT-435.
15.
Clark, J. P., Stetson, G. M., Magge, S. S., Ni, R. H., Haldeman, C. W., Jr., and Dunn, M. G., 2000 “The Effect of Airfoil Scaling on the Predicted Unsteady Loading on the Blade of a 1 and 1/2 Stage Transonic Turbine and a Comparison with Experimental Results,” ASME paper no. 2000-GT-0446.
16.
Davis, R. L., Yao, J., Clark, J. P., Stetson, G., Alonso, J. J., Jameson, A., Dunn, M. G., Haldeman, C. W., “Unsteady Interaction Between a Transonic Turbine Stage and Downstream Components,” ASME paper no. GT-2002-30364.
17.
Clark, J. P., Aggarwala, A. S., Velonis, M. A., Gacek, R. E., Magge, S. S., and Price, F. R., “Using CFD to Reduce Resonant Stresses on a Single-Stage, High-Pressure Turbine Blade,” ASME paper no. GT-2002-30320.
18.
Krumanaker, M. L., Haldeman, C. W., and Dunn, M. G., 2003, “Heat Transfer and Aerodynamic Measurements for a Modern Stage and One-Half Transonic Turbine,” ASME paper no. GT2003-38725.
19.
Krumanaker, M. L., 2002, “Aerodynamics and Heat Transfer for a Modern Stage and One-Half Turbine,” OSU Masters thesis, GTL Doc. No. 2002-10-M7.
20.
Dunn, M. G., Moller, J. C., and Steel, R. C., 1989, “Operating Point Verification for a Large Shock Tunnel Test Facility,” Aeropropulsion and Power Laboratory, USAF, Report No. WRDC-TR-2027.
You do not currently have access to this content.