The performance deterioration of a high-speed axial compressor rotor due to surface roughness and airfoil thickness variations is reported. A 0.025 mm (0.001 in.) thick rough coating with a surface finish of 2.54–3.18 rms μm (100–125 rms μin.) is applied to the pressure and suction surface of the rotor blades. Coating both surfaces increases the leading edge thickness by 10 percent at the hub and 20 percent at the tip. Application of this coating results in a loss in efficiency of 6 points and a 9 percent reduction in the pressure ratio across the rotor at an operating condition near the design point. To separate the effects of thickness and roughness, a smooth coating of equal thickness is also applied to the blade. The smooth coating surface finish is 0.254–0.508 rms μm (10–20 rms μin.), compared to the bare metal blade surface finish of 0.508 rms pm (20 rms μin.). The smooth coating results in approximately half of the performance deterioration found from the rough coating. Both coatings are then applied to different portions of the blade surface to determine which portions of the airfoil are most sensitive to thickness/roughness variations. Aerodynamic performance measurements are presented for a number of coating configurations at 60, 80, and 100 percent of design speed. The results indicate that thickness/roughness over the first 2 percent of blade chord accounts for virtually all of the observed performance degradation for the smooth coating, compared to about 70 percent of the observed performance degradation for the rough coating. The performance deterioration is investigated in more detail at design speed using laser anemometer measurements as well as predictions generated by a quasi-three-dimensional Navier–Stokes flow solver, which includes a surface roughness model. Measurements and analysis are performed on the baseline blade and the full-coverage smooth and rough coatings. The results indicate that adding roughness at the blade leading edge causes a thickening of the blade boundary layers. The interaction between the rotor passage shock and the thickened suction surface boundary layer then results in an increase in blockage, which reduces the diffusion level in the rear half of the blade passage, thus reducing the aerodynamic performance of the rotor.

1.
Alber
I. E.
,
Bacon
J. W.
,
Masson
B. S.
, and
Collins
D. J.
,
1973
, “
An Experimental Investigation of Turbulent Transonic Viscous-Inviscid Interactions
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
11
, No.
5
, pp.
620
627
.
2.
Baldwin, B. S., and Lomax, H., 1978, “Thin-Layer Approximation and Algebraic Model for Separated Turbulent Flows,” AIAA Paper No. 78-257.
3.
Boyle, R. J., and Civinskas, K. C., 1991, “Two-Dimensional Navier–Stokes Heat Transfer Analysis for Rough Turbine Blades,” AIAA Paper No. 91-2129; also NASA TM 106008.
4.
Boyle
R. J.
,
1994
, “
Prediction of Surface Roughness and Incidence Effects on Turbine Performance
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
116
, pp.
745
751
.
5.
Boynton
J. L.
,
Tabibzadeh
R.
, and
Hudson
S. T.
,
1993
, “
Investigation of Rotor Blade Roughness Effects on Turbine Performance
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
115
, pp.
614
620
.
6.
Cebeci
T.
, and
Chang
K. C.
,
1978
, “
Calculation of Incompressible Rough-Wall Boundary Layer Flows
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
16
, July, pp.
730
735
.
7.
Chima
R. V.
,
1987
, “
Explicit Multigrid Algorithm for Quasi-Three-Dimensional Viscous Flows in Turbomachinery
,”
Journal of Propulsion and Power
, Vol.
3
, No.
5
, pp.
397
405
.
8.
Covey, R. R., Mascetti, G. J., and Roessler, W. U., 1978, “Examination of Commercial Aviation Operational Energy Conservation Strategies,” The Aerospace Corporation, Aerospace Report No. ATR-79(7761)-1, Vol. 2.
9.
Dawes, W. N., 1988, “Development of a 3-D Navier Stokes Solver for Application to All Types of Turbomachinery,” ASME Paper No. 88-GT-70.
10.
DOE/FAA, 1981, Proceedings of the DOE/FAA Symposium on Commercial Aviation Energy Conservation Strategies, Apr.
11.
Koch
C. C.
, and
Smith
L. H.
,
1976
, “
Loss Sources and Magnitudes in Axial-Flow Compressors
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Power
, Vol.
98
, pp.
411
424
.
12.
Kramer, W. H., Paas, J. E., Smith, J. J., and Wulf, R. H., 1980, “CF6-6D Engine Short-Term Performance Deterioration,” NASA CR-159830.
13.
Liepmann, H. W., and Roshko, A., 1967, Elements of Gasdynamics, Wiley, New York.
14.
Moore, R. D., and Reid, L., 1980, “Performance of a Single-Stage Axial-Flow Transonic Compressor With Rotor and Stator Aspect Ratios of 1.19 and 1.26, Respectively, and With Design Pressure Ratio of 2.05,” NASA TP 1659.
15.
Moses, J. J., and Serovy, G. K., 1951, “Effect of Blade-Surface Finish on Performance of a Single-Stage Axial-Flow Compressor,” NASA RME51c09.
16.
Nichols, C. E., Jr., 1987, “Preparation of Polystyrene Microspheres for Laser Velocimetry in Wind Tunnels,” NASA TM 89163.
17.
Reid
L.
, and
Urasek
D. C.
,
1973
, “
Experimental Evaluation of the Effects of a Blunt Leading Edge on the Performance of a Transonic Rotor
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Power
, Vol.
95
, pp.
199
204
.
18.
Reid, L., and Moore, R. D., 1978, “Design and Overall Performance of Four Highly-Loaded, High-Speed Inlet Stages for an Advanced High-Pressure-Ratio Core Compressor,” NASA TP 1337.
19.
Roelke
R. J.
, and
Haas
J. E.
,
1983
, “
The Effect of Rotor Blade Thickness and Surface Finish on the Performance of a Small Axial Flow Turbine
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Power
, Vol.
105
, pp.
377
382
.
20.
Sallee, G. P., Kruckenburg, H. D., and Toomey, E. H., 1978, “Analysis of Turbofan Engine Performance Deterioration and Proposed Follow-on Tests,” NASA CR-134769.
21.
Strazisar, A. J., Wood, J. R., Hathaway, M. D., and Suder, K. L., 1989, “Laser Anemometer Measurements in a Transonic Axial-Flow Fan Rotor,” NASA TP 2879.
22.
Suder, K. L., and Celestina, M. L., 1994, “Experimental and Computational Investigation of the Tip Clearance Flow in a Transonic Axial Compressor Rotor,” ASME Paper 94-GT-365; accepted for publication in ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.