Abstract

Accurately assessing wear volume is critical for advancing material development, improving manufacturing practices, and extending the lifespan of mechanical components. In four-ball tribometer tests, traditional methods typically estimate wear volume based on wear scar diameters, a two-dimensional approach. While some studies have modeled wear craters as three-dimensional features, these models are limited by their reliance on ball material and wear scar diameter, without considering the lubricant's influence. Additionally, such methods are prone to inaccuracies due to the irregular geometry of wear scars and the comparable scale of the calculated wear volume's height to surface roughness. These limitations highlight the need for precise methods to calculate wear volumes that go beyond conventional geometrical approximations. This research presents an advanced approach utilizing three-dimensional (3D) profilometry to achieve precise wear volume calculations. By analyzing the depth and contours of wear scars, the actual wear volume is determined by subtracting the deformed scar volume from the original, undeformed ball volume. The proposed methodology also incorporates an analysis of uncertainties, offering a robust framework for more reliable wear quantification. Experimental findings confirm the effectiveness of this technique, highlighting its improved accuracy and consistency over conventional diameter-based methods.

References

1.
Hirani
,
H.
, and
Goilkar
,
S. S.
,
2009
, “
Formation of Transfer Layer and Its Effect on Friction and Wear of Carbon–Graphite Face Seal Under dry, Water and Steam Environments
,”
Wear
,
266
(
11–12
), pp.
1141
1154
.
2.
Lasi
,
H.
,
Fettke
,
P.
,
Kemper
,
H.-G.
,
Feld
,
T.
, and
Hoffmann
,
M.
,
2014
, “
Industry 4.0
,”
Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng.
,
6
(
4
), pp.
239
242
.
3.
Ghobakhloo
,
M.
,
2020
, “
Industry 4.0, Digitization, and Opportunities for Sustainability
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
,
252
, p.
119869
.
4.
Blau
,
P. J.
, and
Budinski
,
K. G.
,
1999
, “
Development and Use of ASTM Standards for Wear Testing
,”
Wear
,
225
, pp.
1159
1170
.
5.
Pérez
,
A. T.
,
Battez
,
A. H.
,
García-Atance
,
G.
, et al
,
2011
, “
Use of Optical Profilometry in the ASTM D4172 Standard
,”
Wear
,
271
(
11–12
), pp.
2963
2967
.
6.
Amanov
,
A.
,
Pyun
,
Y. S.
,
Kim
,
J. H.
, and
Sasaki
,
S.
,
2014
, “
The Usability and Preliminary Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Nanocrystalline Surface Modification Technique on Surface Properties of Silicon Carbide
,”
Appl. Surf. Sci.
,
311
, pp.
448
460
.
7.
Feng
,
I.-M.
,
1962
, “
A New Approach in Interpreting the Four-Ball Wear Results
,”
Wear
,
5
(
4
), pp.
275
288
.
8.
Dorinson
,
A.
,
1981
, “
The Nature of the Wear Process in the Four-Ball Lubricant Test
,”
Wear
,
68
(
1
), pp.
109
127
.
9.
Barsari
,
M. A. N.
, and
Shirneshan
,
A.
,
2019
, “
An Experimental Study of Friction and Wear Characteristics of Sunflower and Soybean Oil Methyl Ester Under the Steady-State Conditions by the Four-Ball Wear Testing Machine
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
141
(
4
), p.
044501
.
10.
Aguilar-Rosas
,
O. A.
,
Farfan-Cabrera
,
L. I.
,
Erdemir
,
A.
, and
Cao-Romero-Gallegos
,
J. A.
,
2023
, “
Electrified Four-Ball Testing–A Potential Alternative for Assessing Lubricants (E-Fluids) for Electric Vehicles
,”
Wear
,
522
, p.
204676
.
11.
Leśniewski
,
T.
, and
Krawiec
,
S.
,
2008
, “
The Effect of Ball Hardness on Four-Ball Wear Test Results
,”
Wear
,
264
(
7–8
), pp.
662
670
.
12.
Masjuki
,
H. H.
, and
Maleque
,
M. A.
,
1997
, “
Investigation of the Anti-Wear Characteristics of Palm Oil Methyl Ester Using a Four-Ball Tribometer Test
,”
Wear
,
206
(
1–2
), pp.
179
186
.
13.
D’Amato
,
R.
,
Calvo
,
R.
,
Ruggiero
,
A.
, and
Gòmez
,
E.
,
2017
, “
Measurement Capabilities for Ball Bearing Wear Assessment
,”
Proc. Manuf.
,
13
, pp.
647
654
.
14.
Ionescu
,
T. F.
,
Cristea
,
G. C.
,
Georgescu
,
C.
,
Ojoc
,
G. G.
,
Titire
,
L. C.
,
Suciu
,
C.
, and
Deleanu
,
L.
,
2021
, “
3d Amplitude Parameters for the Wear Scars Resulted After Testing Additivated Rapeseed Oils on Four-Ball Tester
,”
Mech. Test. Diagn.
,
11
(
4
), pp.
5
14
.
15.
Pawlus
,
P.
, and
Reizer
,
R.
,
2023
, “
Profilometric Measurements of Wear Scars: A Review
,”
Wear
,
534–535
, p.
205150
.
16.
Wright
,
M. S.
,
Jain
,
V. K.
, and
Saba
,
C. S.
,
1989
, “
Wear Rate Calculation in the Four-Ball Wear Test
,”
Wear
,
134
(
2
), pp.
321
334
.
17.
Pérez
,
A. T.
,
Battez
,
A. H.
,
García-Atance
,
G.
,
Viesca
,
J. L.
,
González
,
R.
, and
Hadfield
,
M.
,
2011
, “
Use of Optical Profilometry in the ASTM D4172 Standard
,”
Wear
,
271
(
11–12
), pp.
2963
2967
.
18.
Kumar
,
P.
,
Hirani
,
G.
, and
Agarwal
,
A.K.
,
2019
, “
Effect of Gear Misalignment on Contact Area: Theoretical and Experimental Studies
,”
Measurment
,
132
, pp.
359
368
.
19.
Pawlus
,
P.
, and
Reizer
,
R.
,
2023
, “
Profilometric Measurement of Low Wear: A Review
,”
Wear
,
532–533
, p.
205102
.
20.
Gåhlin
,
R.
, and
Jacobson
,
S.
,
1998
, “
A Novel Method to Map and Quantify Wear on a Micro-Scale
,”
Wear
,
222
(
2
), pp.
93
102
.
21.
Kumar
,
P.
, and
Hirani
,
H.
,
2021
, “
Misalignment Effect on Gearbox Failure: An Experimental Study
,”
Measurement
,
169
, p.
108492
.
22.
Toro
,
F. G.
, and
Lehmann
,
H.
,
2021
, “
Brief Overview of the Future of Metrology
,”
Meas. Sens.
,
18
, p.
100306
.
23.
Mathia
,
T. G.
,
Pawlus
,
P.
, and
Wieczorowski
,
M.
,
2011
, “
Recent Trends in Surface Metrology
,”
Wear
,
271
(
3–4
), pp.
494
508
.
24.
Xiao
,
M.
,
Liu
,
Y.
,
Zhang
,
L.
,
Jia
,
W.
, and
Dong
,
S.
,
2023
, “
Extraction and Expression of Deformation Features for Wear Images From Four-Ball Friction Test: For Classification Purpose
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J: J. Eng. Tribol.
,
237
(
2
), pp.
268
275
.
25.
Georgescu
,
C.
,
Deleanu
,
L.
, and
Pirvu
,
C.
,
2016, August
, “
Evaluating Lubricant Performance by 3D Profilometry of Wear Scars
,”
IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng.
,
147
(
1
), p.
012016
.
26.
Villanueva
,
E.
,
Albizuri
,
J.
,
Caballero
,
P.
,
Guraya
,
T.
, and
Vicario
,
I.
,
2024
, “
Prediction of Wear Rate by a New Direct Method Using the Friction Coefficient Curve
,”
J. Manuf. Mater. Process.
,
9
(
1
), p.
6
.
27.
Kirkup
,
L.
, and
Frenkel
,
B.
,
2006
,
An introduction to Uncertainty in Measurement: Using the GUM (Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement
,
Cambridge University Press
.
You do not currently have access to this content.