Abstract

The measurement of the real contact area between rough surfaces is one of the most challenging problems in contact mechanics and is of importance to understand some physical mechanisms in tribology. Based on the frustrated total internal reflection, a new apparatus is designed to measure the real contact area. For metallic samples with various surface topographies, the relation between normal load and the real contact area is measured. The unloading process is first considered to distinguish the contribution of elasticity and plasticity in contact with rough surfaces. It is found that both elasticity and plasticity are involved throughout the continuous loading process, different from some present understanding and assumptions that they play at different loading stages. A quantitative parameter is proposed to indicate the contribution of plasticity. The present work not only provides an experimental method to measure the real contact area but figures out how elastic and plastic deformation works in contact with rough surfaces.

References

1.
Bowden
,
F. P.
, and
Tabor
,
D.
,
1939
, “
The Area of Contact Between Stationary and Between Moving Surfaces
,”
Proc. R. Soc. A
,
169
(
938
), pp.
391
413
.
2.
Popov
,
V. L.
,
2010
,
Contact Mechanics and Friction
,
Springer
,
Berlin
.
3.
Cooper
,
M. G.
,
Mikic
,
B. B.
, and
Yovanovi
,
M. M.
,
1969
, “
Thermal Contact Conductance
,”
Int. J. Heat. Mass. Tran.
,
12
(
3
), pp.
279
300
. 10.1016/0017-9310(69)90011-8
4.
Greenwood
,
J. A.
, and
Williamson
,
J. B. P.
,
1966
, “
Contact of Nominally Flat Surfaces
,”
Proc. R. Soc. A
,
295
(
1442
), pp.
300
319
.
5.
Archard
,
J. F.
,
1957
, “
Elastic Deformation and the Laws of Friction
,”
Proc. R. Soc. A
,
243
(
1233
), pp.
190
205
.
6.
Majumdar
,
A.
, and
Bhushan
,
B.
,
1991
, “
Fractal Model of Elastic-Plastic Contact Between Rough Surfaces
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
113
(
1
), pp.
1
11
. 10.1115/1.2920588
7.
Ciavarella
,
M.
, and
Demelio
,
G.
,
2001
, “
Elastic Multiscale Contact of Rough Surfaces: Archard's Model Revisited and Comparisons With Modern Fractal Models
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
68
(
3
), pp.
496
498
. 10.1115/1.1352016
8.
Persson
,
B. N. J.
,
2001
, “
Theory of Rubber Friction and Contact Mechanics
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
,
115
(
8
), pp.
3840
3861
. 10.1063/1.1388626
9.
Carbone
,
G.
, and
Bottiglione
,
F.
,
2008
, “
Asperity Contact Theories: Do They Predict Linearity Between Contact Area and Load?
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
,
56
(
8
), pp.
2555
2572
. 10.1016/j.jmps.2008.03.011
10.
Greenwood
,
J. A.
, and
Wu
,
J. J.
,
2001
, “
Surface Roughness and Contact: An Apology
,”
Mechanica
,
36
(
6
), pp.
617
630
. 10.1023/A:1016340601964
11.
Persson
,
B. N. J.
,
2001
, “
Elastoplastic Contact Between Randomly Rough Surfaces
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
,
87
(
11
), p.
116101
. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.116101
12.
Poon
,
C. Y.
, and
Sayles
,
R. S.
,
1992
, “
The Classification of Rough Surface Contacts in Relation to Tribology
,”
J. Phys. D
,
25
(
1A
), pp.
A249
A256
. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/25/1A/038
13.
Holm
,
R.
,
1958
,
Electric Contacts Handbook
,
Springer
,
Berlin
.
14.
Kendall
,
K.
, and
Tabor
,
D.
,
1971
, “
An Ultrasonic Study of the Area of Contact Between Stationary and Sliding Surfaces
,”
Proc. R. Soc. A
,
323
(
1554
), pp.
321
340
.
15.
Woo
,
K. L.
, and
Thomas
,
T. R.
,
1980
, “
Contact of Rough Surfaces: A Review of Experimental Work
,”
Wear
,
58
(
2
), pp.
331
340
. 10.1016/0043-1648(80)90162-3
16.
Ovcharenko
,
A.
,
Halperin
,
G.
,
Etsion
,
I.
, and
Varenberg
,
M.
,
2006
, “
A Novel Test Rig for in Situ and Real Time Optical Measurement of the Contact Area Evolution During Pre-Sliding of a Spherical Contact
,”
Tribol. Lett.
,
23
(
1
), pp.
55
63
. 10.1007/s11249-006-9113-9
17.
Zugelj
,
B. B.
, and
Kalin
,
M.
,
2017
, “
In-situ Observations of a Multi-Asperity Real Contact Area on a Submicron Scale
,”
Strojniski Vestn. J. Mech. Eng.
,
63
(
6
), pp.
351
362
. 10.5545/sv-jme.2017.4366
18.
Krick
,
B. A.
,
Vail
,
J. R.
,
Persson
,
B. N. J.
, and
Sawyer
,
W. G.
,
2012
, “
Optical in Situ Micro Tribometer for Analysis of Real Contact Area for Contact Mechanics, Adhesion, and Sliding Experiments
,”
Tribol. Lett.
,
45
(
1
), pp.
185
194
. 10.1007/s11249-011-9870-y
19.
Weber
,
B.
,
Suhina
,
T.
,
Junge
,
T.
,
Pastewka
,
L.
,
Brouwer
,
A. M.
, and
Bonn
,
D.
,
2018
, “
Molecular Probes Reveal Deviations From Amontons’ Law in Multi-Asperity Frictional Contacts
,”
Nat. Commun.
,
9
(
1
), p.
808
. 10.1038/s41467-018-03102-5
20.
Lechthaler
,
B.
,
Ochs
,
G.
,
Mücklich
,
F.
, and
Dienwiebel
,
M.
,
2019
, “
Evolution of the True Contact Area of Laser Textured Tungsten Under Dry Sliding Conditions
,”
Front. Mech. Eng.
,
5
, p.
3
. 10.3389/fmech.2019.00003
21.
Rubinstein
,
S. M.
,
Cohen
,
G.
, and
Fineberg
,
J.
,
2004
, “
Detachment Fronts and the Onset of Dynamic Friction
,”
Nature
,
430
(
7003
), pp.
1005
1009
. 10.1038/nature02830
22.
Song
,
B. J.
,
Yan
,
S. Z.
, and
Xiang
,
W. W. K.
,
2015
, “
A Measurement Method for Distinguishing the Real Contact Area of Rough Surfaces of Transparent Solids Using Improved Otsu Technique
,”
Chinese Phys. B
,
24
(
1
), p.
014601
. 10.1088/1674-1056/24/1/014601
23.
Bennett
,
A. I.
,
Harris
,
K. L.
,
Schulze
,
K. D.
,
Urueña
,
J. M.
,
McGhee
,
A. J.
,
Pitenis
,
A. A.
,
Müser
,
M. H.
,
Angelini
,
T. E.
, and
Sawyer
,
W. G.
,
2017
, “
Contact Measurements of Randomly Rough Surfaces
,”
Tribol. Lett.
,
65
(
4
), p.
134
. 10.1007/s11249-017-0918-5
24.
De Fornel
,
F.
,
2001
,
Evanescent Waves: From Newtonian Optics to Atomic Optics
,
Springer
,
Berlin
.
25.
Zeng
,
Y.
,
Wang
,
Z. J.
,
Qin
,
N.
,
Jiang
,
L.
,
Du
,
W. H.
, and
Qian
,
L. M.
,
2019
, “
Adhesive Contact of a Diamond Sphere With an Iron Substrate Caused by Interatomic Interaction
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol.
,
234
(
12
), pp.
1926
1939
. 10.1177/1350650119897484
26.
Pei
,
L.
,
Hyun
,
S.
,
Molinari
,
J. F.
, and
Robbins
,
M. O.
,
2005
, “
Finite Element Modeling of Elasto-Plastic Contact Between Rough Surfaces
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
,
53
(
11
), pp.
2385
2409
. 10.1016/j.jmps.2005.06.008
You do not currently have access to this content.