The contact area and pressure distribution in a wheel/rail contact is essential information required in any fatigue or wear calculations to determine design life, re-grinding, and maintenance schedules. As wheel or rail wear or surface damage takes place the contact patch size and shape will change. This leads to a redistribution of the contact stresses. The aim of this work was to use ultrasound to nondestructively quantify the stress distribution in new, worn, and damaged wheel-rail contacts. The response of a wheel/rail interface to an ultrasonic wave can be modeled as a spring. If the contact pressure is high the interface is very stiff, with few air gaps, and allows the transmission of an ultrasonic sound wave. If the pressure is low, interfacial stiffness is lower and almost all the ultrasound is reflected. A quasistatic spring model was used to determine maps of contact stiffness from wheel/rail ultrasonic reflection data. Pressure was then determined using a parallel calibration experiment. Three different contacts were investigated; those resulting from unused, worn, and sand damaged wheel and rail specimens. Measured contact pressure distributions are compared to those determined using elastic analytical and numerical elastic-plastic solutions. Unused as-machined contact surfaces had similar contact areas to predicted elastic Hertzian solutions. However, within the contact patch, the numerical models better reproduced the stress distribution, as they incorporated real surface roughness effects. The worn surfaces were smoother and more conformal, resulting in a larger contact patch and lower contact stress. Sand damaged surfaces were extremely rough and resulted in highly fragmented contact regions and high local contact stress.

1.
Lewis
,
R.
, and
Dwyer-Joyce
,
R. S.
, 2006, “
Wear at the Wheel/Rail Interface When Sanding is Used to Increase Adhesion
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., F J. Rail Rapid Transit
0954-4097,
220
, pp.
29
41
.
2.
Telliskivi
,
T.
, and
Olofsson
,
U.
, 2001, “
Contact Mechanics Analysis of Measured Wheel-Rail Profiles using the Finite Element Method
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., F J. Rail Rapid Transit
0954-4097,
215
, pp.
65
72
.
3.
Yan
,
W.
, and
Fischer
,
F. D.
, 2000, “
Applicability of the Hertz Contact Theory to Rail-Wheel Contact Problems
,”
Arch. Appl. Mech.
0939-1533,
70
, pp.
255
268
.
4.
Dwyer-Joyce
,
R. S.
, and
Drinkwater
,
B. W.
, 1998, “
Analysis Of Contact Pressure Using Ultrasonic Reflection
,”
Experimental Mechanics, Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Experimental Mechanics
,
Balkema
, Rotterdam, pp.
747
754
.
5.
Pau
,
M.
,
Aymerich
,
F.
, and
Ginesu
,
F.
, 2000, “
Ultrasonic Measurement of Nominal Contact Area and Contact Pressure in a Wheel/Rail System
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., F J. Rail Rapid Transit
0954-4097,
214
, pp.
231
243
.
6.
Kendall
,
K.
, and
Tabor
,
D.
, 1971, “
An Ultrasonic Study of the Area of Contact between Stationary and Sliding Surfaces
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
1364-5021,
323
, pp.
321
340
.
7.
Tattersall
,
A. G.
, 1973, “
The Ultrasonic Pulse-Echo Technique as Applied to Adhesion Testing
,”
J. Phys. D
0022-3727,
6
, pp.
819
832
.
8.
Drinkwater
,
B. W.
,
Dwyer-Joyce
,
R. S.
, and
Cawley
,
P.
, 1996, “
A Study of the Interaction between Ultrasound and a Partially Contacting Solid-Solid Interface
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
1364-5021,
452
, pp.
2613
2628
.
9.
Hodgson
,
K.
,
Dwyer-Joyce
,
R. S.
, and
Drinkwater
,
B. W.
, 2000, “
Ultrasound as an Experimental Tool for Investigating Engineering Contacts
,”
Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Symposium on Tribology
,
P.
Andersson
,
H.
Ronkainen
, and
K.
Holmberg
, eds., Vol.
2
, pp.
377
386
.
10.
Arakawa
,
T.
, 1983, “
A Study of the Transmission of Elastic Waves by a Periodic Array of Cracks
,”
Mater. Eval.
0025-5327,
41
, pp.
714
719
.
11.
Krautkrämer
,
J.
, and
Krautkrämer
,
H.
, 1990,
Ultrasonic Testing of Materials
,
Springer Verlag
, Berlin.
12.
Olofsson
,
U.
, and
Telliskivi
,
T.
, 2003, “
Wear, Friction and Plastic Deformation of Two Rail Steels—Full Scale Test and Laboratory Study
,”
Wear
0043-1648,
254
, pp.
80
93
.
13.
Olofsson
,
U.
, and
Nilsson
,
R.
, 2002, “
Surface Cracks and Wear of Rail: A Full Scale Test and Laboratory Study
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., F J. Rail Rapid Transit
0954-4097,
216
, pp.
249
264
.
14.
Fischer
,
G.
,
Grubisic
,
V.
, and
Widmayer
,
H.
, 1988, “
Fatigue Tests on Wheelsets under Simulated Service Strength Spectra
,”
Proceedings of the 9th International Wheelset Congress
,
Montreal.
15.
Dwyer-Joyce
,
R. S.
,
Drinkwater
,
B. W.
, and
Quinn
,
A. M.
, 2001, “
The Use of Ultrasound in the Investigation of Rough Surface Interfaces
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
123
, pp.
8
16
.
16.
Krolikowski
,
J.
, and
Szczepek
,
J.
, 1991, “
Prediction of Contact Parameters using Ultrasonic Method
,”
Wear
0043-1648,
148
, pp.
181
195
.
17.
Johnson
,
K. L.
, 1985,
Contact Mechanics
,
Cambridge University Press
, Cambridge.
18.
Tabor
,
D.
, 1951,
The Hardness of Metals
,
Monographs on the Physics and Chemistry of Materials
,
Oxford University Press
, Oxford.
19.
Björklund
,
S.
, 1995, “
Elastic Contacts between Rough Surfaces
,” Doctoral Thesis, Department of Machine Design, KTH, Report No. TRITA-MMK 1995:4.
20.
Love
,
A. E. H.
, 1929, “
Stress Produced in an Infinite Solid by Pressure on Part of the Boundary
,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
0962-8428,
A228
(
377
), pp.
54
59
.
21.
Webster
,
M. N.
, and
Sayles
,
R. S.
, 1986, “
A Numerical Model for the Elastic Frictionless Contact of Real Rough Surfaces
,”
Trans. ASME, J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
108
(
3
), pp.
314
320
.
22.
Poole
,
W.
, 1987, “
The Measurement of Contact Area between Opaque Objects Under Static and Dynamic Rolling Conditions
,”
Proceedings of Contact Mechanics and Wear of the Wheel/Rail System
, University of Rhode Island,
Waterlooville Press
, pp.
59
72
.
You do not currently have access to this content.