An extended computational bulk-flow analysis for prediction of performance in angled injection, orifice-compensated hydrostatic/hydrodynamic thrust bearings is presented. The fluid motion within the thin film lands is governed by mass conservation and momentum transport equations. Mass flow conservation and a simple model for momentum transport within the hydrostatic bearing recesses are also accounted for. A perturbation analysis for small amplitude shaft axial motions and angulations leads to zeroth and first-order equations describing the equilibrium and perturbed fluid flows. The computational procedure predicts the bearing flow rate, thrust load and restoring moments, drag torque, and 27 force and moment coefficients. The effects of misalignment on the dynamic performance of a refrigerant fluid-hybrid thrust bearing are evaluated at an optimal operating condition. The axial force/displacement stiffness coefficient and the direct moment/angle stiffness coefficients show a maximum for a certain recess pressure ratio, while the damping coefficient steadily increases with the applied load. As the misalignment angle increases, both moment and force coefficients also increase. Most operating conditions show a whirl frequency ratio equal to 0.50. Thus, thrust hybrid bearings offer the same limited stability characteristics as hydrodynamic thrust bearings when undergoing self-excited shaft angular motions.

1.
San Andre´s
,
L.
,
1995
, “
Thermohydrodynamic Analysis of Fluid Film Bearings for Cryogenic Applications
,”
AIAA Journal of Propulsion and Power
,
11
, pp.
964
972
.
2.
San Andre´s
,
L.
,
1993
, “
The Effect of Journal Misalignment on the Operation of a Turbulent Hydrostatic Bearing
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
115
, pp.
355
363
.
3.
San Andre´s
,
L.
, and
Childs
,
D.
,
1997
, “
Angled Injection—Hydrostatic Bearings, Analysis and Comparison to Test Results
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
119
, pp.
179
187
.
4.
San Andre´s
,
L.
,
2000
, “
Bulk-Flow Analysis of Hybrid Thrust Bearings for Process Fluid Applications
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
122
, pp.
170
180
.
5.
Mittwollen, N., Hegel, H., and Glienicke, J., 1990, “Effect of Hydrodynamic Thrust Bearigs on Lateral Shaft Vibrations,” ASME Paper 90-Trib-63.
6.
Pinkus
,
O.
, and
Lund
,
J. K.
,
1981
, “
Centrifugal Effects in Thrust Bearings Under Laminar Conditions
,”
ASME J. Lubr. Technol.
,
103
, pp.
126
136
.
7.
Jeng
,
M. C.
, and
Szeri
,
A. Z.
,
1986
, “
A Thermohydrodynamic Solution of Pivoted Thrust Pads, III: Linearized Force Coefficients
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
108
, pp.
214
218
.
8.
Someya
,
T.
, and
Fukuda
,
M.
,
1972
, “
Analysis and Experimental Verification of Dynamic Characteristics of Oil Film Thrust Bearings
,”
Bulletin of the JSME
,
15
, pp.
1004
1015
.
9.
Green
,
I.
, and
Etsion
,
I.
,
1985
, “
Stability Threshold and Steady-State Response of Noncontacting Coned-Face Seals
,”
ASLE Trans.
,
8
, pp.
449
460
.
10.
Hirs
,
G. G.
,
1973
, “
A Bulk-Flow Theory for Turbulence in Lubricant Films
,”
ASME J. Lubr. Technol.
,
94
, pp.
137
146
.
11.
San Andre´s, L., 2000, “Computational Analysis of Misaligned Hybrid Thrust Bearings for Advanced Cryogenic Turbo Pumps,” final progress report to NASA MSFC, Texas A&M University, December-College Station, TX.
12.
Childs, D., 1993, Turbomachinery Rotordynamics, John Wiley Publishers, New York.
13.
Launder
,
B. E.
, and
Leschziner
,
M.
,
1978
, “
Flow in Finite-Width Thrust Bearings Including Inertial Effects: 2—Turbulent Flow
,”
ASME J. Lubr. Technol.
,
100
, pp.
339
345
.
14.
Van Doormaal
,
J. P.
, and
Raithby
,
G. D.
,
1984
, “
Enhancements of the SIMPLE Method for Predicting Incompressible Fluid Flows
,”
Numer. Heat Transfer
,
7
, pp.
147
163
.
You do not currently have access to this content.