Abstract

In this paper, a resiliency analysis is carried out to assess the energy, economic, and power outage survivability benefits of efficient and net-zero energy communities. The analysis addresses the appropriate steps to designing an energy-efficient and net-zero energy community using Phoenix, Arizona, as a primary location for weather and utility inputs. A baseline home is established using International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) 2018 code requirements. Three occupancy levels are evaluated in BEopt to provide diversity in the community’s building stock. The loads from the baseline, energy-efficient optimum, and net-zero energy optimum single-family homes are utilized to determine energy use profiles for various residential community types using occupancy statistics for Phoenix. Then, REopt is used to determine the photovoltaic (PV) and battery storage system sizes necessary for the community to survive a 72-hour power outage. The analysis results indicated that the baseline community requires a 544-kW PV system and 375-kW/1,564 kWh battery storage system to keep all electrical loads online during a 72-hour power outage. The energy-efficient community requires a 291-kW PV system and a 202-kW/820 kWh battery storage system while the net-zero energy community requires a 291-kW PV system and a 191-kW/880 kWh battery storage system. In this study, the economic analysis indicates that it is 31% more cost-effective to install a shared PV plus storage system than to install individual PV plus storage systems in an energy-efficient community. After analyzing the system sizes and costs required to survive various outage durations, it is found that only a 4% difference in net present cost exists between a system sized for a 24-hour outage and a 144-hour outage. In the event of a pandemic or an event that causes a community-wide lockdown, the energy-efficient community would only survive 6 h out of a 72-hour power outage during a time where plug loads are increased by 50% due to added laptops, monitors, and other office electronics. Finally, a climate sensitivity analysis is conducted for efficient communities in Naperville, Illinois, and Augusta, Maine. The analysis suggests that for a 72-hour power outage starting on the peak demand day and time of the year, the cost of resiliency is higher in climates with more heating and cooling needs as heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and cooling (HVAC) is consistently the largest load in a residential building.

References

1.
European Commission
, “
NZEB
,”
2019
. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/.
2.
California Public Utilities Commission
, “
Zero Net Energy
,” State of California,
2020
. https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/ZNE/
3.
Peterson
,
A.
,
Gartman
,
M.
, and
Corvidae
,
J.
,
2019
,
The Economics of Zero-Energy Homes: Single-Family Insights
,
Rocky Mountain Institute
,
Basalt, CO
.
4.
Team Zero
,
2018
,
2018 Inventory of Residential Projects on the Path to Zero in the U.S. and Canada
,
Team Zero
,
Richmond, CA
.
5.
Kallushi
,
A.
,
Harris
,
J.
,
Miller
,
J.
,
Johnston
,
M.
, and
Ream
,
A.
,
2012
, “
Think Bigger: Net-Zero Communities
,”
2012 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings
,
Pacific Grove, CA
.
6.
U.S. Department of Energy
,
2015
,
EcoVillage: A Net Zero Energy Ready Community
,
DOE Building America
,
Washington, DC
.
7.
Ching
,
T.
,
2012
, “
Kalaeloa NZE Community
.”
8.
Magrini
,
A.
,
Lentini
,
G.
,
Cuman
,
S.
,
Bodrato
,
A.
, and
Marenco
,
L.
,
2020
, “
From Nearly Zero Energy Buildings (NZEB) to Positive Energy Buildings (PEB): The Next Challenge—The Most Recent European Trends With Some Notes on the Energy Analysis of a Forerunner PEB Example
,”
Dev. Built Environ.
,
3
, p.
100019
.
9.
D'Agostino
,
D.
, and
Parker
,
D.
,
2018
, “
A Framework for the Cost-Optimal Design of Nearly Zero Energy Buildings (NZEBs) in Representative Climates Across Europe
,”
Energy
,
149
, pp.
814
829
.
10.
Hobart
,
S.
,
2019
,
2019 Zero Energy Buildings Count Nears 600
,
New Buildings Institute
,
Portland, OR
.
11.
Alemi
,
P.
, and
Loge
,
F.
,
2017
, “
Energy Efficiency Measures in Affordable Zero net Energy Housing: A Case Study of the UC Davis 2015 Solar Decathlon Home
,”
Renewable Energy
,
101
, pp.
1242
1255
.
12.
Hoque
,
S.
,
2010
, “
Net Zero Energy Homes: An Evaluation of Two Homes in the Northeastern United States
,”
J. Green Build.
,
5
(
2
), pp.
79
90
.
13.
He
,
D.
,
Huang
,
S.
,
Zuo
,
W.
, and
Kaiser
,
R.
,
2016
, “
Towards to the Development of Virtual Testbed for Net Zero Energy Communities
,”
SimBuild 2016: Building Performance Modeling Conference
,
Salt Lake City, UT
,
Aug. 10–12
, pp.
125
132
.
14.
Ajaei
,
F. B.
, and
Jafer
,
M.
,
2017
, “
Hybrid AC/DC Microgrid Configurations for[Q13] a Net-Zero Energy Community
,”
2019 IEEE/IAS 55th Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Technical Conference (I&CPS)
,
Calgary, AB, Canada
,
May 5–8
.
15.
Gong
,
H.
,
Rallabandi
,
I.
,
Colliver
,
D.
,
Duerr
,
S.
, and
Ababei
,
C.
,
2018
, “
Net Zero Energy Houses With Dispatchable Solar PV Power Supported by Electric Hater Heater and Batter Energy Storage
,”
2018 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)
,
Portland, OR
,
Sept. 23–27
.
16.
Anderson
,
K.
,
Laws
,
N. D.
,
Marr
,
S.
,
Lisell
,
L.
,
Jimenez
,
T.
,
Case
,
T.
,
Li
,
X.
,
Lohmann
,
D.
, and
Cutler
,
D.
,
2018
, “
Quantifying and Monetizing Renewable Energy Resilience
,”
Sustainability
,
10
(
4
), pp.
933
946
.
17.
Better Buildings
,
2019
,
How Distributed Energy Resources Can Improve Resilience in Public Buildings: Three Case Studies and a Step-by-Step Guide
,
U.S. Department of Energy
,
Washington, DC
.
18.
Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy
,
2019
,
Energy Efficiency and Distributed Generation for Resilience: Withstanding Grid Outages for Less
,
U.S. Department of Energy
,
Washington, DC
.
19.
Wang
,
J.
,
Garifi
,
K.
,
Baker
,
K.
,
Zuo
,
W.
,
Zhang
,
Y.
,
Huang
,
S.
, and
Vrabie
,
D.
,
2020
, “
Optimal Renewable Resource Allocation and Load Scheduling of Resilient Communities
,”
Energies
,
13
(
21
), p.
5683
.
20.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,
2017
,
Building Energy Optimization Tool (BEopt)
,
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,
Golden, CO
.
21.
Western Regional Climate Center
. “
Phoenix City, Arizona: Period of Record General Climate Summary
,” 28 July 2006. https://wrcc.dri.edu
22.
Marlene Imizrain & Associates Architects
,
2016
,
Homenz: Sustainable Single Family Home
,
City of Phoenix
,
Phoenix, AZ
.
23.
Zub
,
E.
,
2020
,
Tariff Schedules Applicable to Gas Service of Southwest Gas Corporation
,
Southwest Gas Corporation
,
Las Vegas, NV
.
24.
Arizona Public Service
.
2020
, “
Residential Service Plans
,”
25.
Hobbick
,
J.
,
2020
,
Rate Rider RCP
,
Arizona Public Service
,
Phoenix, AZ
.
26.
Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy
,
2020
,
Homeowner's Guide to the Federal Tax Credit for Solar Photovoltaics
,
U.S. Department of Energy
,
Washington, DC
.
27.
International Code Council
,
2017
, “
2018 International Energy Conservation Code
.”
28.
Wilson
,
E.
,
Metzger
,
C.
,
Horowitz
,
S.
, and
Hendron
,
R.
,
2014
,
2014 Building America House Simulation Protocols
,
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,
Golden, CO
.
29.
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.
, “
ASHRAE Standard 55: Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy
,”
2010
.
30.
City-Data.com
. “
Phoenix, AZ (Arizona) Houses and Residents
,”
2017
. https://www.city-data.com
31.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,
2020
,
REopt Lite
,
U.S. Department of Energy
,
Washington, DC
, https://reopt.nrel.gov/tool/
32.
The President's National Infrastructure Advisory Council
,
2018
,
Surviving a Catastrophic Power Outage
,
NIAC
,
Washington, DC
.
33.
Fu
,
R.
,
Feldman
,
D.
, and
Margolis
,
R.
,
2018
,
U.S. Solar Photovoltaic System Cost Benchmark: Q1 2018
,
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,
Golden, CO
.
34.
Cole
,
W.
, and
Frazier
,
A.
,
2019
,
Cost Projections for Utility-Scale Battery Storage
,
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,
Golden, CO
.
35.
Giraldez
,
J.
,
Flores-Espino
,
F.
,
MacAlpine
,
S.
, and
Asmus
,
P.
,
2018
,
Phase I Microgrid Cost Study: Data Collection and Analysis of Microgrid Costs in the United States
,
NREL
,
Golden, CO
.
36.
Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy
,
2019
,
Solar-Plus-Storage 101
,
U.S. Department of Energy
,
Washington, DC
, https://www.energy.gov
37.
City of Naperville, Illinois
, “
Building Codes
,”
2020
. https://www.naperville.il.us
38.
State of Maine
,
2020
,
Building Codes
,
Department of Public Safety, Office of State Fire Marshal
,
Augusta, ME
, https://www.maine.gov
39.
Western Regional Climate Center
, “
Period of Record General Climate Summary for Chicago Univ, Illinois
,”
2012
. https://wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?il1572
40.
City of Naperville, Illinois
, “
Residential Energy Efficiency Rebates
,”
2020
. https://www.naperville.il.us/
41.
City of Naperville, Illinois
, “
Electric Rates
,”
2020
. https://www.naperville.il.us
42.
South Turner Maine Weather
, “
Degree Days Summary
,”
2020
. http://www.southturnermaineweather.com
43.
Efficiency Maine
,
2020
,
Weatherization
,
Efficiency Maine
,
Augusta, ME
, https://www.efficiencymaine.com
44.
Maine Public Utilities Commission
,
2019
,
Net Energy Billing (NEB)
,
State of Maine
,
Hallowell, ME
, https:///www.maine.gov
You do not currently have access to this content.