Storage tanks are widely used in the industry to store hydrocarbon products. Corrosion damage is considered to be a serious threat to the structural integrity of the industrial storage tanks if it occurs on the primary pressure containment boundary. Therefore, fitness-for-service (FFS) assessment of these structures is performed periodically in order to ensure the operational safety and structural integrity. In this paper, evaluation methods are proposed for FFS assessment of storage tanks undergoing corrosion damage. The proposed methods are shown to give reasonably accurate and conservative assessment of the remaining strength factor. The methods are demonstrated through an example and the results are verified by inelastic finite element analysis.

1.
American Petroleum Institute
, 2000, “
Recommended Practice for Fitness-for-Service
,” API 579.
2.
British Energy
, 2001, “
Assessment of Integrity of Structures Containing Defects
,” R6 Revision 4.
3.
SINTAP
, 1999, “
Structural Integrity Assessment Procedure for European Industry
,” Brite Euram Programme Project BE95-1426, Final Procedure, British Steel Report No. BE95-1426/FR/7.
4.
American Gas Association
,
Kniefner
,
J. F.
, and
Vieth
,
P. H.
, 1989, “
A Modified Criterion for Evaluating the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipe (With RSTRENG)
,” Catalogue No. L51609, PR3-805.
5.
Seshadri
,
R.
, 2005, “
Integrity Assessment of Pressure Components With Local Hot Spots
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
127
, pp.
137
142
.
6.
Seshadri
,
R.
, and
Mangalaramanan
,
S. P.
, 1997, “
Lower Bound Limit Loads Using Variational Concepts: The mα-Method
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
0308-0161,
71
, pp.
93
106
.
7.
Indermohan
,
H.
, and
Seshadri
,
R.
, 2005, “
Fitness-for-Service Methodology Based on Variational Principals in Plasticity
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
127
, pp.
92
97
.
8.
Ramkumar
,
B.
, and
Seshadri
,
R.
, 2005, “
Fitness for Service Assessment of Corroded Pipelines Based on Variational Principles in Plasticity
,”
Journal of Pipeline Integrity
,
2
, pp.
99
116
.
9.
Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines
, 1984,
ASME
,
New York
.
10.
Tantichattanont
,
P.
,
Adluri
,
S.
, and
Seshadri
,
R.
, 2007, “
Structural Integrity Evaluation for Corrosion in Spherical Pressure Vessels
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
0308-0161,
84
, pp.
749
761
.
11.
Sims
,
J. R.
,
Hantz
,
B. F.
, and
Kuehn
,
K. E.
, 1992, “
A Basis for the Fitness for Service Evaluation of Thin Areas in Pressure Vessels and Storage Tanks
,” ASME Paper No. 1992-233.
12.
Mura
,
T.
,
Rimawi
,
W. H.
, and
Lee
,
S. L.
, 1965, “
Extended Theorems of Limit Analysis
,”
Q. Appl. Math.
0033-569X,
23
, pp.
171
179
13.
Reinhardt
,
W. D.
, and
Seshadri
,
R.
, 2003, “
Limit Load Bounds for the mα-Multipliers
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
125
, pp.
11
18
.
14.
Seshadri
,
R.
, and
Hossain
,
M. M.
, 2009, “
Simplified Limit Load Determination Using the mα-Tangent Method
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
131
(
2
), p.
021213
.
15.
Tantichattanont
,
P.
,
Adluri
,
S. M. R.
, and
Seshadri
,
R.
, 2007, “
Fitness-for-Service Evaluation of Thermal Hot Spots and Corrosion Damage in Cylindrical Pressure Components
,” ASME Paper No. PVP2007-26704.
16.
Munson
,
R.
,
Young
,
F.
, and
Okiishi
,
H.
,
Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
17.
ANSYS, 2008,
University Research Version 11.0
,
SASIP Inc.
,
PA
.
You do not currently have access to this content.