Multiple interacting cracks are generally treated as an enveloping single crack if the prescribed criterion is satisfied in the current fitness-for-service codes. To examine the applicability of the existing criteria under creep regime, in this report, creep crack interaction effects of plates containing collinear cracks or parallel cracks are first analyzed under the framework of reference stress method and finite element computations. An equivalent crack growth rate criterion is then proposed to develop a congruous multiple crack treatment rule for different growth mechanisms. The current combination rule for multiple cracks is examined and modified in terms of the proposed new criterion. The results reveal that the creep crack interaction factor is a combined function of creep exponent n of materials, limit load ratio of cracked structures, and interaction of stress intensity factor. More pronounced interaction is observed for both interacting cracks in the same plane and that in different planes. Although a higher intensity of creep crack interaction is observed, a greater value of γcreep is permissible compared with that of linear-elastic crack interaction denoted by SIF. Accordingly, a modified combination rule for collinear cracks of S/a=3.0 is proposed to exclude the nonconservativeness, while the current alignment rule for offset parallel cracks of H/a=2.0 is still practicable in terms of the proposed criterion.

1.
Liu
,
X.
,
Xuan
,
F. Z.
,
Si
,
J.
, and
Tu
,
S. T.
, 2008, “
Expert System for Remaining Life Prediction of Defected Components Under Fatigue and Creep-Fatigue Loadings
,”
Expert Syst. Applic.
,
34
, pp.
222
230
.
2.
American Petroleum Institute
, 2007, API 579-1/ASME FFS-1, Fitness-for-Service, Section 9.
3.
Guidance on Methods of Assessing the Acceptability of Flaws in Metallic Structures
, 2005,
British Standard Institutions
,
London, UK
,
BS7910
.
4.
Assessment of the Integrity of Structures Containing Defects
, 2006,
British Energy Generation Ltd.
,
Gloucester
, Revision 4, R6.
5.
Safety Assessment for In-Service Pressure Vessels Containing Defects
, 2004,
Chinese Standards
,
Beijing
, GB/T19624-2004.
6.
ASME
, 2007, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section XI, New York.
7.
Kamaya
,
M.
, 2006, “
Flaw Proximity Rules for Parallel Surface Cracks Based on Elastic, Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics and Limit Load Analyses
,” ASME Paper No. PVP2006-IVPVT-11.
8.
Hasegawa
,
K.
,
Saito
,
K.
, and
Miyazaki
,
K.
, 2009, “
Alignment Rule for Non-Aligned Flaws for Fitness-for-Service Evaluations Based on LEFM
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
131
, p.
041403
.
9.
Leek
,
T. H.
, and
Howard
,
I. C.
, 1996, “
An Examination of Methods of Assessing Interacting Surface Cracks by Comparison with Experimental Data
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
0308-0161,
68
, pp.
181
201
.
10.
Carpinteri
,
A.
,
Brighenti
,
R.
, and
Vantadori
,
S.
, 2004, “
A Numerical Analysis on the Interaction of Twin Coplanar Flaws
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
0013-7944,
71
, pp.
485
499
.
11.
Moussa
,
W. A.
,
Bell
,
R.
, and
Tan
,
C. L.
, 1999, “
Interaction of Two Parallel Non-Coplanar Identical Surface Cracks under Tension and Bending
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
0308-0161,
76
, pp.
135
145
.
12.
Xuan
,
F. Z.
,
Si
,
J.
, and
Tu
,
S. T.
, 2008, “
Surface Effects on Time-Dependent Fracture Parameter of Subsurface Crack in Plates Under Tension
,”
Int. J. Fract.
0376-9429,
153
(
2
), pp.
117
123
.
13.
Yokobori
,
T.
,
Uosumi
,
M.
, and
Ichikawa
,
M.
, 1971, “
Interaction Between Overlapping Parallel Elastic Cracks
,”
Journal of the Japanese Society for Strength and Fracture of Materials
0286-4010,
6
(
2
), pp.
39
50
.
14.
Sethuraman
,
R.
,
Reddy
,
G.
, and
Ilango
,
I. T.
, 2003, “
Finite Element Based Evaluation of Stress Intensity Factors for Interactive Semi-Elliptic Surface Cracks
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
0308-0161,
80
, pp.
843
859
.
15.
Krishnamurthy
,
T.
, and
Raju
,
I. S.
, 1990, “
A Finite Element Alternating Method for Two Dimensional Mixed Mode Crack Configurations
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
0013-7944,
36
, pp.
297
311
.
16.
Kamaya
,
M.
, 2008, “
Influence of the Interaction on Stress Intensity Factor of Semielliptical Surface Cracks
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
130
, p.
011406
.
17.
Murakami
,
Y.
, and
Nemat-Nasser
,
S.
, 1982, “
Interaction Dissimilar Semi-Elliptical Surface Flaws Under Tension and Bending
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
0013-7944,
16
, pp.
373
386
.
18.
Chen
,
Y. Z.
, 2007, “
Integral Equation Methods for Multiple Crack Problems and Related Topics
,”
Appl. Mech. Rev.
0003-6900,
60
, pp.
172
194
.
19.
Xuan
,
F. Z.
,
Tu
,
S. T.
, and
Wang
,
Z. D.
, 2005, “
A Modification of ASTM E 1457 C∗ Estimation Equation for Compact Tension Specimen With a Mismatched Cross-Weld
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
0013-7944,
72
, pp.
2602
2614
.
20.
Si
,
J.
,
Xuan
,
F. Z.
, and
Tu
,
S. T.
, 2008, “
A Numerical Creep Analysis on the Interaction of Twin Semi-Elliptical Cracks
,”
Int. J. Press. Vessels Piping
,
85
, pp.
459
467
.
21.
Xuan
,
F. Z.
,
Tu
,
S. T.
, and
Wang
,
Z. D.
, 2004, “
C∗ Estimation for Cracks in Mismatched Welds and Finite Element Validation
,”
Int. J. Fract.
0376-9429,
126
, pp.
267
280
.
22.
Ainsworth
,
R. A.
, 1984, “
The Assessment of Defects in Structures of Strain Hardening Materials
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
0013-7944,
19
, pp.
633
642
.
23.
Lei
,
Y.
, 2007, “
Use of Local and Global Limit Load Solutions for Plates With Surface Cracks Under Tension
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
0308-0161,
84
, pp.
545
559
.
24.
Lei
,
Y.
, 2004, “
J-Integral and Limit Load Analysis of Semi-Elliptical Surface Cracks in Plates Under Tension
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
0308-0161,
81
, pp.
21
30
.
25.
Kim
,
Y. J.
,
Shim
,
D. J.
,
Choi
,
J. B.
, and
Kim
,
Y. J.
, 2002, “
Approximate J Estimates for Tension-Loaded Plates With Semi-Elliptical Surface Cracks
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
0013-7944,
69
, pp.
1447
1463
.
26.
Lei
,
Y.
, and
Budden
,
P. J.
, 2004, “
Limit Load Solutions for Plates With Embedded Cracks Under Combined Tension and Bending
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
0308-0161,
81
, pp.
589
597
.
27.
Rooke
,
D. P.
, and
Cartwright
,
D. J.
, 1976,
Compendium of Stress Intensity Factors
,
H.M.S.O.
,
London
.
28.
ABAQUS
, 2006, Hibbit, Karlsson, and Sorensen, ABAQUS User’s Manual, Version 6.7.
29.
Kim
,
Y. -J.
,
Kim
,
J. S.
,
Huh
,
N. S.
, and
Kim
,
Y. J.
, 2002, “
Engineering C-Integral Estimates for Generalized Creep Behaviour and Finite Element Validation
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
0308-0161,
79
, pp.
427
443
.
30.
Hasegawa
,
K.
, and
Miyazaki
,
K.
, 2007, “
Alignment and Combination Rules on Multiple Flaws in Fitness-for-Service Procedures
,”
Key Eng. Mater.
1013-9826,
345–346
, pp.
411
416
.
31.
Ciavarella
,
M.
,
Paggi
,
M.
, and
Carpinteri
,
A.
, 2008, “
One, No One, and One Hundred Thousand Crack Propagation Laws: A Generalized Barenblatt and Botvina Dimensional Analysis Approach to Fatigue Crack Growth
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
0022-5096,
56
, pp.
3416
3432
.
32.
Ainsworth
,
R. A.
, 1993, “
The Use of a Failure Assessment Diagram for Initiation and Propagation of Defects at High Temperatures
,”
Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct.
8756-758X,
16
, pp.
1091
1108
.
33.
Nikbin
,
K.
, 2001, “
A Unified European Approach to High Temperature Defect Assessment Code and Its Incorporation in a Knowledge Base System
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
0308-0161,
78
, pp.
929
935
.
You do not currently have access to this content.