Because of their importance for the integrity of heat exchangers, the strength of tube-to-tubesheet joints, and particularly their axial strength, is of special interest. A finite element model of an expanded tube-to-tubesheet joint is proposed and examined experimentally with the objective of determining numerically its axial strength. Simplified analytical methods that were previously proposed by many authors to predict the joint axial strength are also used in this investigation. Experimental testing shows that the finite element model is highly accurate for calculating the joint axial strength. The experimental investigation also proves that the pull-out strength is overestimated when calculated using a simple analytical solution. A parametric analysis using the finite element results indicates that the pull-out force is normally lower than the push-out load and that both are lower than the estimations of the analytical solution. The results indicate that the pull-out force as given by the finite element model is generally 35 percent lower than that evaluated by the analytical solution. A difference of as much as 10 percent is also found between the push-out and pull-out loads.

1.
Toba, A., 1966, “Residual Stress and Stress Corrosion Cracking in the Vicinity of Expanded Joint of Aluminum Brass Tube Condensers,” J. Jpn. Pet. Inst., 9.
2.
Uragami, K., et al. 1982, “Experimental Residual Stresses Analysis of Tube to Tubesheet Joints During Expansion,” ASME 82-PVP-61.
3.
Bazergui, A., et al., 1985, “Residual Stresses in Roller Expanded Thin Tubes,” J. Experimental Mechanics, pp. 316–324.
4.
Updike, D., et al., 1988, “A Method for Calculating Residual Stresses in Transition Zones of Heat Exchanger,” ASME PVP Conference, Vol. 139.
5.
Hawang, J., et al., 1993, “Analytical Evaluation of the Hydraulic Expansion of Steam Generator Tubing in to Tubesheet,” Int. Conf. on Expanded and Rolled Joint Technology, Toronto, Canada.
6.
Goodier
,
J. N.
, et al.
,
1943
, “
The Holding Power and Hydraulic Tightness of Expanded Tube Joints: Analysis of the Stress and Deformation
,”
Trans. ASME
,
65
, pp.
489
496
.
7.
Nadai
,
A.
,
1943
, “
Theory of the Expanding of Boiler and Condenser Tube Joints Through Rolling
,”
Trans. ASME
,
65
, Nov., pp.
865
880
.
8.
Yokell, S., 1992, “Expanded and Welded and Expanded Tube to Tubesheet Joints,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 114.
9.
Podhorsky
,
M.
and
Krips
H.
,
1979
, “
Hydraulic Expansion of Tubes
,”
VGB KRAFTWERKSTECHNIK
, No.
1
, pp.
77
83
.
10.
Jawad, M., et al., 1987, “Evaluation of Tube to Tubesheet Joint Junctions,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 109.
11.
ASME Pressure Vessel Code 1994, Section VIII, Div. 1, Appendix A.
12.
Fender, D. A., et al., 1985, “Current Development in the On-Going Investigation of Steam Surface Condenser Roller Expanded Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints,” Joint Power Generation, ASME Paper No. 85-JPGO-Pwr-15.
13.
Shirazi-Adl, S., et al., 1993, “Experimental Determination of Friction Characteristics at the Tabular Bone/Porous-Coated Metal Interface in Cementers Implants,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 27.
14.
Soler, A., et al., 1984, Mechanical Design of Heat Exchanger and Pressure Vessel Components, Arcturus Publishers, Cherry Hill.
15.
ABAQUS 1995, Version 5.3, Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc.
16.
Chaaban
,
A.
, et al.
,
1992
, “
Tube-Tubesheet Joint: A Proposed Equation for The Equivalent Sleeve Diameter Used in Single-Tube Model
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
114
, pp.
19
22
.
17.
Kohlpaintner, W., 1995, “Calculation of Hydraulically Expanded Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 117.
18.
Halling, J., 1975, Principles of Tribology, MacMillan, London, UK.
19.
Taguchi, G., 1982, System of Experimental Design, Kraus Int. Publ.
You do not currently have access to this content.