A technology to determine shallow-flaw fracture toughness of reactor pressure vessel (RPV) steels is being developed. This technology is for application to the safety assessment of RPVs containing postulated shallow-surface flaws. It has been shown that relaxation of crack-tip constraint causes shallow-flaw fracture toughness of RPV material to have a higher mean value than that for deep flaws in the lower transition temperature region. Cruciform beam specimens developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) introduce far-field, out-of-plane biaxial stress components in the test section that approximates the nonlinear stresses resulting from pressurized-thermal-shock (PTS) loading of an RPV. The biaxial stress component has been shown to increase stress triaxiality (constraint) at the crack tip, and thereby reduce the shallow-flaw fracture toughness enhancement. The cruciform specimen permits controlled application of biaxial loading ratios, resulting in controlled variation of crack-tip constraint. An extensive matrix of intermediate-scale cruciform specimens with a uniform depth surface flaw was previously tested and demonstrated a continued decrease in shallow-flaw fracture toughness with increasing biaxial loading. This paper describes the test results for a series of large-scale cruciform specimens with a uniform depth surface flaw. These specimens were all of the same size with the same depth flaw and were tested at the same temperature and biaxial load ratio (1:1). The configuration is the same as the previous set of intermediate-scale tests, but has been scaled upward in size by 150 percent. These tests demonstrated the effect of biaxial loading and specimen size on shallow-flaw fracture toughness in the lower transition temperature region for RPV materials. For specimens tested under full biaxial (1:1) loading at test temperatures in the range of 23°F (−5°C) to 34°F (1°C), toughness was reduced by approximately 15 percent for a 150-percent increase in specimen size. This decrease was slightly greater than the predicted reduction for this increase in specimen size. The size corrections for 1/2T C(T) specimens did not predict the experimentally determined mean toughness values for larger size shallow-flaw specimens tested under biaxial (1:1) loading in the lower transition temperature region.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
stress analysis, fracture, fracture mechanics, fracture toughness testing, pressure vessels, fission reactor materials, mechanical testing
Topics:
Fracture (Materials), Fracture toughness, Stress, Temperature, Testing, Heat, Fracture (Process)
1.
Theiss
,
T. H.
, and
Shum
,
D. K. M.
,
1992
, “Experimental and Analytical Investigation of the Shallow-Flaw Effect in Reactor Pressure Vessels,” USNRC Report NUREG/CR-5886 (ORNL/TM-12115), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
2.
Dickson, T. L., McAfee, W. J., Pennell, W. E., and Williams, P. T., 1998, “Evaluation of Margins in the ASME Rules for Defining the P-T Curve for a RPV,” Proc. Twenty-Sixth Water Reactor Safety Meeting, NUREG/CP-0166, Vol. 1, pp. 47–72.
3.
Link
,
R. E.
, and
Joyce
,
J. A.
,
1996
, “Application of Fracture Toughness Scaling Models to the Ductile-to-Brittle Transition,” USNRC Report NUREG/CR-6279, U.S. Naval Academy.
4.
Bass B. R., Keeney J. A., and McAfee W. J., 1995, “Assessment of the Fracture Behavior of Weld Material from a Full-Thickness Clad RPV Shell Segment,” Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics in Pressure Vessels and Piping, ASME PVP-Vol. 304, pp. 299–311.
5.
Theiss, T. J., et al., 1994, “Initial Results of the Influence of Biaxial Loading on Fracture Toughness,” USNRC Report NUREG/CR-6132 (ORNL/TM-12498), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
6.
McAfee, W. J., Bass, B. R., Bryson, J. W., Jr., and Pennell, W. E., 1995, “Biaxial Loading Effects on Fracture Toughness of Reactor Pressure Vessel Steel,” USNRC Report NUREG/CR-6273 (ORNL/TM-12866), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
7.
Pennell, W. E., Bass, B. R., Bryson, J. W., Jr., Dickson, T. L., and Merkle, J. G., 1996, “Preliminary Assessment of the Effects of Biaxial Loading on Reactor Pressure Vessel Structural-Integrity-Assessment Technology,” Proc., 4th ASME/JSME International Conference in Nuclear Engineering, New Orleans, LA.
8.
McAfee, W. J., Bass, B. R., and Bryson, J. W., Jr., 1997, “Development of a Methodology for the Assessment of Shallow-Flaw Fracture in Nuclear Reactor Pressure Vessels: Generation of Biaxial Shallow-Flaw Fracture Toughness Data,” ORNL/NRC/LTR-97/4, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
9.
Bass, B. R., McAfee, W. J., Williams, P. T., and Pennell, W. E., 1998, “Evaluation of Constraint Methodologies Applied to a Shallow-Flaw Cruciform Bend Specimen Tested Under Biaxial Loading Conditions,” Fatigue, Fracture, and High Temperature Design Methods in Pressure Vessels and Piping, ASME PVP-Vol. 365, pp. 11–25.
10.
McAfee
,
W. J.
, and
Pennell
,
W. E.
,
1996
, “Development of Heat-Treating Specification for Surrogate Irradiated Base Material,” Heavy-Section Steel Technology Program Semiannual Progress Report for October 1994-March 1995, USNRC Report NUREG/CR-4219 (ORNL/TM-9593/V12&N1), Vol. 12, No. 1, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, p. 5.
11.
Nanstad
,
R. K.
, et al.,
1992
, “Irradiation Effects on Fracture Toughness of Two High-Copper Submerged-Arc Welds, HSSI Series 5,” USNRC Report NUREG/CR-5913 (ORNL/TM-12156/V1), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
12.
ASTM Standard E 1921-97, 1998, “Test Method for the Determination of Reference Temperature, T0, for Ferritic Steels in the Transition Range,” ASTM Standard Vol. 03.01, Section 3.
13.
Kirk, M. T., and Dodds, R. H., Jr., 1992, “Experimental and Analytical Investigation of the Shallow-Flaw Effect in Reactor Pressure Vessels,” NUREG/CR-5886 (ORNL/TM-12115).
14.
ABAQUS Theory Manual, 1993, Version 5.3, Hibbitt, Karlson, and Sorenson, Inc., Providence, RI.
15.
The American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 1989, Section XI, “Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components,” Appendix A, “Analysis of Flaws,” Article A-4000, Material Properties, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY.
16.
Kirk, M. T., Koppenhoefer, K. C., and Shih, C. F., 1993, “Effect of Constraint on Specimen Dimensions Needed to Obtain Structurally Relevant Toughness Measures,” Constraint Effects in Fracture, ASTM STP 1171, E. M. Hackett, K.-H. Schwalbe, and R. H. Dodds, eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, , pp. 79–103.
17.
Smith, J. A., and Rolfe, S. T., 1997, “Report No. 3 C - The Significance of Crack Depth (a) and Crack Depth to Width Ratio a/W With Respect to the Behavior of Very large Specimens,” Constraint Effects on Fracture Behavior, WRC Bulletin 418, Welding Research Council, New York, NY, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
You do not currently have access to this content.