Graphical Abstract Figure
Graphical Abstract Figure
Close modal

Abstract

Maritime autonomous surface ships (MASSs) will reshape the fast-evolving ecosystem for their attractive socio-economic benefits and potential to improve safety. However, their new systems and technology need thorough verifications to identify unintended components of risk. The interaction between MASS cyber-physical systems and the existing regulatory framework is currently unpredictable; artificial intelligence-powered intelligent situation awareness and autonomous navigation algorithms must safely and efficiently adhere to the regulations which are only designed for human interpretation without MASSs consideration. This paper contributes to algorithmic regulations and particularly algorithmic COLREGs in real-world MASS applications. It focuses on codifying COLREGs into a machine-executable system applicable to MASSs, then analyzing their performance in dynamic and mixed interactions between multiple vessels in complex scenarios. Based on fullest pairwise COLREGs criteria, this paper considers decision-making (DM) and complexity analysis in multi-collision-conflict scenarios. Complexity influential factors are an interplay between the characteristics of COLREGs, traffic scenarios, MASS interactions, and the environment. Participant vessels are the decision-makers forming a decentralized uncertain DM process, casted into a multi-participant multi-conflict multicriteria DM problem. This is tackled through the technique of graph models for conflict resolution, using risk graph models and fuzzy preferences over alternative collision-avoidance states. This paper conducts a comprehensive analysis of DM and navigational complexity; we develop novel complexity estimation scores, tools for complexity monitoring for human intervention, and spatial analysis of traffic complexity for geo-intelligent MASSs deployment and operation planning. The presented work is validated on a database of historical scenarios extracted from multiple data sources.

References

1.
AAWA Position Paper
,
2016
, “Remote and Autonomous Ships: The Next Steps,” Rolls-Royce Plc Registered Office.
2.
Varas
,
J. M.
,
Hirdaris
,
S.
,
Smith
,
R.
,
Scialla
,
P.
,
Caharija
,
W.
,
Bhuiyan
,
Z.
,
Mills
,
T.
, et al
,
2017
, “
MAXCMAS Project. Autonomous COLREGs Compliant Ship Navigation
,”
16th International Conference on Computer Applications and Information Technology in the Maritime Industries
,
Cardiff, UK
,
May 15–17
, pp.
454
464
.
3.
Wang
,
T.
,
Wu
,
Q.
,
Zhang
,
J.
,
Wu
,
B.
, and
Wang
,
Y.
,
2020
, “
Autonomous Decision-Making Scheme for Multi-Ship Collision Avoidance With Iterative Observation and Inference
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
197
, p.
106873
.
4.
Kufoalor
,
D. K. M.
,
Johansen
,
T. A.
,
Brekke
,
E. F.
,
Hepsø
,
A.
, and
Trnka
,
K.
,
2020
, “
Autonomous Maritime Collision Avoidance: Field Verification of Autonomous Surface Vehicle Behavior in Challenging Scenarios
,”
J. Field Rob.
,
37
(
3
), pp.
387
403
.
5.
Li
,
G.
,
Hildre
,
H. P.
, and
Zhang
,
H.
,
2020
, “
Toward Time-Optimal Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Ship Maneuvering in Close-Range Encounters
,”
IEEE J. Ocean. Eng.
,
45
(
4
), pp.
1219
1234
.
6.
Johansen
,
T. A.
,
Perez
,
T.
, and
Cristofaro
,
A.
,
2016
, “
Ship Collision Avoidance and COLREGS Compliance Using Simulation-Based Control Behavior Selection With Predictive Hazard Assessment
,”
IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.
,
17
(
12
), pp.
3407
3422
.
7.
Goerlandt
,
F.
,
2020
, “
Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships From a Risk Governance Perspective: Interpretation and Implications
,”
Saf. Sci.
,
128
, p.
104758
.
8.
Felski
,
A.
, and
Zwolak
,
K.
,
2020
, “
The Ocean-Going Autonomous Ship—Challenges and Threats
,”
J. Mar. Sci. Eng.
,
8
(
1
), p.
41
.
9.
Kristoffersen
,
C.
,
2020
, “Unmanned Autonomous Vessels and the Necessity of Human-Centred Design,”
DS 101: Proceedings of NordDesign 2020
,
Lyngby, Denmark
,
Aug. 12–14
.
10.
Bakdi
,
A.
, and
Vanem
,
E.
,
2022
, “
Fullest COLREGs Evaluation Using Fuzzy Logic for Collaborative Decision-Making Analysis of Autonomous Ships in Complex Situations
,”
IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.
,
23
(
10
), pp.
18433
18445
.
11.
Bakdi
,
A.
,
Glad
,
I. K.
, and
Vanem
,
E.
,
2021
, “
Testbed Scenario Design Exploiting Traffic Big Data for Autonomous Ship Trials Under Multiple Conflicts With Collision/Grounding Risks and Spatio-Temporal Dependencies
,”
IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.
,
22
(
12
), pp.
1
17
.
12.
Bashar
,
M. A.
,
Kilgour
,
D. M.
, and
Hipel
,
K. W.
,
2012
, “
Fuzzy Preferences in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution
,”
IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst.
,
20
(
4
), pp.
760
770
.
13.
Tao
,
J.
,
Liu
,
Z.
,
Wang
,
X.
,
Cao
,
Y.
,
Zhang
,
M.
,
Loughney
,
S.
,
Wang
,
J.
, and
Yang
,
Z.
,
2024
, “
Hazard Identification and Risk Analysis of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships: A Systematic Review and Future Directions
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
307
, pp.
118174
.
14.
Li
,
X.
, and
Yuen
,
K. F.
,
2024
, “
A Human-Centred Review on Maritime Autonomous Surfaces Ships: Impacts, Responses, and Future Directions
,”
Transp. Rev.
,
44
(
4
), pp.
791
810
.
15.
“Data Derived from OpenStreetMap for Download,” https://osmdata.openstreetmap.de/. Accessed May 5, 2021.
16.
“OpenStreetMap Data Extracts,” http://download.geofabrik.de/. Accessed May 5, 2021.
17.
“AT5-OpenSeaMap-Chart for Lowrance Simrad B&G,” https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AT5-OpenSeaMap-Chart_for_Lowrance_Simrad_B%26G. Accessed May 5, 2021.
18.
“ERA5 Hourly Data on Pressure Levels From 1979 to Present,” Accessed May 5, 2021.
19.
ESR
,
2009
, “OSCAR Third Deg. Ver. 1. PO.DAAC, CA, USA,” Dataset. Accessed May 5, 2021.
20.
Bathymetry
, https://portal.emodnet-bathymetry.eu/. Accessed May 5, 2021.
21.
“ASOS-AWOS-METAR Data Download,” http://mesonet.agron.iastate.edu/request/download.phtml?network=DK__ASOS. Accessed May 5, 2021.
22.
Caldwell
,
P. C.
,
Merrifield
,
M. A.
, and
Thompson
,
P. R.
,
2015
, “Sea Level Measured by Tide Gauges From Global Oceans—The Joint Archive for Sea Level Holdings (NCEI Accession 0019568), Version 5.5,” NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. Dataset. Accessed May 5, 2021.
23.
“Obtaining UHSLC Data,” https://uhslc.soest.hawaii.edu/datainfo/. Accessed May 5, 2021.
24.
Vestre
,
A.
,
Bakdi
,
A.
,
Vanem
,
E.
, and
Engelhardtsen
,
Ø.
,
2021
, “
AIS-Based Near-Collision Database Generation and Analysis of Real Collision Avoidance Manoeuvres
,”
J. Navig.
,
74
(
5
), pp.
985
1008
.
25.
Xu
,
Z.
, and
Yager
,
R. R.
,
2006
, “
Some Geometric Aggregation Operators Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
,”
Int. J. Gen. Syst.
,
35
(
4
), pp.
417
433
.
26.
Namgung
,
H.
, and
Kim
,
J. S.
,
2021
, “
Collision Risk Inference System for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships Using COLREGs Rules Compliant Collision Avoidance
,”
IEEE Access
,
9
, pp.
7823
7835
.
27.
Ning
,
J.
,
Chen
,
H.
,
Li
,
T.
,
Li
,
W.
, and
Li
,
C.
,
2020
, “
COLREGS-Compliant Unmanned Surface Vehicles Collision Avoidance Based on Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm
,”
IEEE Access
,
8
, pp.
190367
190377
.
28.
Shaobo
,
W.
,
Yingjun
,
Z.
, and
Lianbo
,
L.
,
2020
, “
A Collision Avoidance Decision-Making System for Autonomous Ship Based on Modified Velocity Obstacle Method
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
215
, p.
107910
.
29.
Zhang
,
X.
,
Wang
,
C.
,
Liu
,
Y.
, and
Chen
,
X.
,
2019
, “
Decision-Making for the Autonomous Navigation of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships Based on Scene Division and Deep Reinforcement Learning
,”
Sensors
,
19
(
18
), p.
4055
.
30.
Rødseth
,
Ø. J.
,
Lien Wennersberg
,
L. A.
, and
Nordahl
,
H.
,
2022
, “
Towards Approval of Autonomous Ship Systems by Their Operational Envelope
,”
J. Mar. Sci. Technol.
,
27
(
1
), pp.
67
76
.
You do not currently have access to this content.