Abstract

This paper reports full-scale tests on threaded connections used in drill strings. A concise background is given concerning the in-service environment and loading conditions on the connections. This details some of the reasons particular steels are used in preference to others. Crack growth data is given for ten full-scale axial and rotating bend tests. This is compared with predictions from a dedicated weight function fracture mechanics solution designed for threaded connections. Crack aspect ratio is considered with a view to development of an appropriate empirical model.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Drill strings, Fatigue, Fracture (Materials), Fracture mechanics, Preferences, Steel, Weight (Mass)
1.
Lubinski, A., “Maximum Permissible Dog-Legs in Rotary Boreholes,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, Vol. 13, 1961.
2.
Hansford, J. E., and Lubinski, A., “Cumulative Fatigue Damage of Drill Pipe in Dog-Legs,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, Mar. 1966.
3.
Hansford, J. E., and Lubinski, A., “Analysis of Some Factors Related to Permissible Horizontal Motions of a Floating Drilling Vessel,” Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, Sept. 1970.
4.
Zeren, F., “Fatigue Limits Analyzed for Drill Pipe in a Dog-Leg,” Oil and Gas Journal, 1986.
5.
Chen, W-C., “Drill String Fatigue Performance,” SPE/IADC, 1987.
6.
Burgess, T. M., McDaniel, G. L., and Das, P. K., “Improving BHA Tool Reliability with Drill String Vibration Models—Field Experience and Limitations,” SPE/IADC, 1987.
7.
Dale, B. A., “Inspection Interval Guide-lines to Reduce Drill String Failures,” IADC/SPE 17207, 1988.
8.
Gensmer, R. P., “Field Correlation Between Internal Taper Length and Tube Failures in 4.5-in. 16.60E, IEU Drill Pipe,” IADC/SPE, 1988.
9.
Tsukano, Y., Nishi, S., Miyoshi, H., and Sogo, Y., “Appropriate Design of Drill Pipe Internal Upset Geometry Focusing on Fatigue Property,” IADC/SPE, 1988.
10.
Dale, B. A., and Moyer, M. C., “Sensitivity and Reliability of Commercial Drill-String Inspection Services,” Seventh Offshore South East Asia Conference, 1988.
11.
Jessop Saville Limited, Hawke Street, Sheffield, UK.
12.
Koper-kote, Product code A10195, Jet Lube UK Inc., Aberdeen.
13.
Smith International Inc., Drilling Assembly Handbook, Houston, TX.
14.
API Specification 7, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, 37th Edition, 1990.
15.
Mackay
T. L.
, and
Alperin
B. J.
, “
Stress Intensity Factors for Fatigue Cracking in High-Strength Bolts
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
, Vol.
21
, No.
2
,
1985
, pp.
391
–
397
.
16.
Tafreshi, A., and Dover, W. D., “Stress Analysis of Drill String Threaded Connections Using the Finite Element Method,” International Journal of Fatigue, 1993.
17.
Kujawski
D.
, “
Estimations of Stress Intensity Factors for Small Cracks at Notches
,”
Fatigue Fracture Engineering Materials and Structures
, Vol.
14
, No.
10
,
1991
, pp.
953
–
965
.
18.
Dover, W. D., et al., “Prevention of Downhole Failure,” Final Report, NDE Centre, University College London, U.K., Mar. 1992.
19.
Brennan, F. P., and Dover, W. D., “Stress Intensity Factors for Threaded Connections,” accepted for publication, Engineering Fracture Mechanics.
20.
Dover, W. D., et al., “Fatigue Analysis of Drill Strings,” Final Report, NDE Centre, University College London, U. K., 1990.
21.
Kermani, B., “Drill String Threaded Connection Failure Analysis and Case Studies,” EMAS, 1989.
22.
Dale, B. A., “An Experimental Investigation of Fatigue Crack Growth in Drill String Tubulars,” SPE 1559, 1986.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1995
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.