Abstract

Design against buckling of thin shells at high temperatures often follows the code RCC-MR. RCC-MR allows three methods to quantify shell imperfections for use in safe load calculations, where lower imperfection values raise the safe load estimates. In recent work, we showed that the third of these methods can sometimes yield remarkably low imperfection values, leading to potentially nonconservative designs, but nonconservatism of the method was not proved. Here, we prove nonconservatism in two designs based on the third method. Proving such nonconservatism is difficult using experiments or with large material nonlinearity in simulations. We first discuss these difficulties to motivate our approach. We then present two examples: a spherical shell and a torispherical shell, both under external pressure. The shell walls are thin enough so that plasticity is not encountered before structural collapse. For specific shape imperfections, we show with geometrically nonlinear, purely elastic, highly refined, post-buckling analysis using abaqus that the physical loads at which the imperfect shells collapse are overpredicted via RCC-MR's third method by factors of about 8/7 and 11/10, respectively. We emphasize that code-based design using nonlinear simulation prescribes a further safety factor of 2.5, which we have denied ourselves here in order to give the third method the benefit of doubt. We conclude that the third imperfection quantification method in RCC-MR should be reexamined.

References

1.
RCC-MRx
,
2012
, “
Section III Tome 1 Subsection Z, Technical Appendix A7, Design and Construction Rules for Mechanical Components of FBR Nuclear Islands
,” AFCEN, Paris, France. 
2.
Kumar
,
A.
, and
Chatterjee
,
A.
,
2019
, “
On One Imperfection Estimation Method for Thin Shell Buckling in the Design Code RCC-MR
,”
J. Nucl. Eng. Radiat. Sci.
,
5
(
4
), p.
10
.10.1115/1.4042117
3.
Jiménez
,
F. L.
,
Marthelot
,
J.
,
Lee
,
A.
,
Hutchinson
,
J. W.
, and
Reis
,
P. M.
,
2017
, “
Technical Brief: Knockdown Factor for the Buckling of Spherical Shells Containing Large-Amplitude Geometric Defects
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
84
(
3
), p.
034501
.10.1115/1.4035665
4.
Lee
,
A.
,
López Jiménez
,
F.
,
Marthelot
,
J.
,
Hutchinson
,
J. W.
, and
Reis
,
P. M.
,
2016
, “
The Geometric Role of Precisely Engineered Imperfections on the Critical Buckling Load of Spherical Elastic Shells
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
83
(
11
), p.
111005
.10.1115/1.4034431
5.
RCC-MRx
,
2012
, “
Section III Tome 1 Subsection Z, Technical Appendix A3, Design and Construction Rules for Mechanical Components of FBR Nuclear Islands
,” AFCEN, Paris, France.
6.
Raj
,
B.
,
Chellapandi
,
P.
, and
Rao
,
P. R. V.
,
2015
,
Sodium Fast Reactors With Closed Fuel Cycle
,
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton, FL
, p.
886
.
7.
 RCC-MRx, 2012, “Section III Tome 1 Subsection B, Design and Construction Rules for Mechanical Components of FBR Nuclear Islands,” AFCEN, Paris, France.
8.
Hutchinson
,
J. W.
,
2016
, “
Buckling of Spherical Shells Revisited
,”
Proc. R. Soc. A
,
472
(
2195
), p.
20160577
.10.1098/rspa.2016.0577
9.
Seaman
,
L.
,
1962
, “
The Nature of Buckling in Thin Spherical Shells
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge, MA.
10.
Zhang
,
J.
,
Zhang
,
M.
,
Tang
,
W.
,
Wang
,
W.
, and
Wang
,
M.
,
2017
, “
Buckling of Spherical Shells Subjected to External Pressure: A Comparison of Experimental and Theoretical Data
,”
Thin-Walled Struct.
,
111
, pp.
58
64
.10.1016/j.tws.2016.11.012
11.
ASME
,
2019
, “
Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels Division 2 Alternative Rules
,” ASME, New York.
12.
Singer
,
J.
,
Arbocz
,
J.
,
Weller
,
T.
, and
Cheney
,
J. A.
,
2003
,
Buckling Experiments: Experimental Methods in Buckling of Thin-Walled Structures. Shells, Built-Up Structures, Composites and Additional Topics
, Vol.
2
,
Wiley
,
New York
, p.
1136
.
You do not currently have access to this content.