Abstract

Ideation methods have been extensively studied, and several ideation methods can be beneficial in different contexts, but it is not understood what makes a specific method work. Previous work has shown that all the ideation methods comprise of 25 fundamental ideation mechanisms in two categories: idea implementation and idea promoting mechanisms. In this study, we try to understand how individual mechanisms affect idea generation outcomes. We chose four idea promoting mechanisms: two from the process category (Classification and Combination) and two from the idea sources category (Building on Others and Stimulation). These mechanisms were selected as they are examples of comparable mechanisms that could be integrated into any other ideation method. We conducted four experiments and assessed idea quantity, novelty, and originality. Our study showed that the chosen mechanisms increased ideation performance. For the most part, the mechanisms are statistically equivalent, but we found evidence that classification outperforms combination in nonengineering concept generation exercise. We also found the building on others can be more useful than the type of stimulation used in engineering concept generation, but the difference was not found in nonengineering concept generation. Overall, we found evidence that all mechanisms improve ideation effectiveness and could be incorporated into any ideation method, but further studies are needed to build a more comprehensive understanding.

References

1.
Cross
,
N.
,
2008
,
Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design
,
John Wiley & Sons
,
Chichester, England
, pp.
46
59
.
2.
Linsey
,
J. S.
,
Clauss
,
E. F.
,
Kurtoglu
,
T.
,
Murphy
,
J. T.
,
Wood
,
K. L.
, and
Markman
,
A. B.
,
2011
, “
An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques: Understanding the Roles of Idea Representation and Viewing Methods
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
133
(
3
), p.
031008
.
3.
Goldschmidt
,
G.
, and
Tatsa
,
D.
,
2005
, “
How Good Are Good Ideas? Correlates of Design Creativity
,”
Des. Stud.
,
26
(
6
), pp.
593
611
.
4.
Daly
,
S. R.
,
Seifert
,
C. M.
,
Yilmaz
,
S.
, and
Gonzalez
,
R.
,
2016
, “
Comparing Ideation Techniques for Beginning Designers
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
138
(
10
), p.
101108
.
5.
Allen
,
M. S.
,
1962
,
Morphological Creativity: The Miracle of Your Hidden Brain Power: A Practical Guide to the Utilization of Your Creative Potential
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
6.
Daly
,
S. R.
,
Yilmaz
,
S.
,
Christian
,
J. L.
,
Seifert
,
C. M.
, and
Gonzalez
,
R.
,
2012
, “
Design Heuristics in Engineering Concept Generation
,”
J. Eng. Edu.
,
101
(
4
), pp.
601
629
.
7.
Yilmaz
,
S.
,
Daly
,
S. R.
,
Seifert
,
C. M.
, and
Gonzalez
,
R.
,
2016
, “
Evidence-Based Design Heuristics for Idea Generation
,”
Des. Stud.
,
46
, pp.
95
124
.
8.
Bloesch-Paidosh
,
A.
, and
Shea
,
K.
,
2021
, “
Enhancing Creative Redesign Through Multi-Modal Design Heuristics for Additive Manufacturing
,”
J. Mech. Des.
,
143
(
10
), p.
102003
.
9.
Altshuller
,
G. S.
,
1984
,
Creativity as an Exact Science: The Theory of the Solution of Inventive Problems.
,
Gordon and Breach
,
New York
.
10.
Eberle
,
R. F.
,
1972
, “
Developing Imagination Through Scamper
,”
J. Creat. Behav.
,
6
(
3
), pp.
199
203
.
11.
Shah
,
J.
,
Vargas-Hernandez
,
N.
, and
Smith
,
S.
,
2003
, “
Metrics for Measuring Ideation Effectiveness
,”
Des. Stud.
,
24
(
2
), pp.
111
134
.
12.
Kirjavainen
,
S.
, and
Hölttä-Otto
,
K.
,
2020
, “
Deconstruction of Idea Generation Methods Into a Framework of Creativity Mechanisms
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
143
(
3
), p.
031401
.
13.
Vargas-Hernandez
,
N.
,
Shah
,
J. J.
, and
Smith
,
S. M.
,
2010
, “
Understanding Design Ideation Mechanisms Through Multilevel Aligned Empirical Studies
,”
Des. Stud.
,
31
(
4
), pp.
382
410
.
14.
Shah
,
J.
,
Kulkarni
,
S.
, and
Vargas-Hernandez
,
N.
,
2000
, “
Evaluation of Idea Generation Methods for Conceptual Design: Effectiveness Metrics and Design of Experiments
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
122
(
4
), pp.
377
384
.
15.
Shah
,
J. J.
,
Smith
,
S. M.
,
Vargas-Hernandez
,
N.
,
Gerkens
,
D. R.
, and
Wulan
,
M.
,
2003
, “
Empirical Studies of Design Ideation: Alignment of Design Experiments With Lab Experiments
,”
Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Chicago, IL
,
Sept. 2–6
, pp.
847
856
.
16.
Linsey
,
J. S.
,
Green
,
M. G.
,
Murphy
,
J. T.
,
Wood
,
K. L.
, and
Markman
,
A. B.
,
2005
, “
Collaborating To Success”: An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques
,”
Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Long Beach, CA
,
Sept. 24–28
, pp.
277
290
.
17.
Blair
,
B. M.
, and
Hölttä-Otto
,
K.
,
2012
, “
Comparing the Contribution of the Group to the Initial Idea in Progressive Idea Generation
,”
Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Chicago, IL
,
Aug. 12–15
, pp.
425
436
.
18.
Sonalkar
,
N.
,
Jablokow
,
K.
,
Edelman
,
J.
,
Mabogunje
,
A.
, and
Leifer
,
L.
,
2017
, “
Design Whodunit: The Relationship Between Individual Characteristics and Interaction Behaviors in Design Concept Generation
,”
Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Cleveland, OH
,
Aug. 6–9
, p.
V007T06A009
.
19.
Heininger
,
K.
,
Chen
,
H.
,
Jablokow
,
K.
, and
Miller
,
S. R.
,
2018
, “
How Engineering Design Students’ Creative Preferences and Cognitive Styles Impact Their Concept Generation and Screening
,”
Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Quebec City, Quebec
,
Aug. 26–29
, p.
V007T06A032
.
20.
Linsey
,
J. S.
, and
Becker
,
B.
,
2011
, “Effectiveness of Brainwriting Techniques: Comparing Nominal Groups to Real Teams,”
Design Creativity 2010
,
T.
Taura
, and
Y.
Nagai
, eds.,
Springer
,
London
, pp.
165
171
.
21.
Gyory
,
J. T.
,
Cagan
,
J.
, and
Kotovsky
,
K.
,
2018
, “
Should Teams Collaborate During Conceptual Engineering Design? An Experimental Study
,”
Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Quebec City, Quebec
,
Aug. 26–29
, p.
V007T06A026
.
22.
McComb
,
C.
, and
Maier
,
T.
,
2018
, “
Designing Improved Teams for Crowdsourced Competitions
,”
Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Quebec City, Quebec
,
Aug. 26–29
, p.
V007T06A025
.
23.
López-Mesa
,
B.
,
Mulet
,
E.
,
Vidal
,
R.
, and
Thompson
,
G.
,
2011
, “
Effects of Additional Stimuli on Idea-Finding in Design Teams
,”
J. Eng. Des.
,
22
(
1
), pp.
31
54
.
24.
Atilola
,
O.
,
Tomko
,
M.
, and
Linsey
,
J. S.
,
2016
, “
The Effects of Representation on Idea Generation and Design Fixation: A Study Comparing Sketches and Function Trees
,”
Des. Stud.
,
42
, pp.
110
136
.
25.
Shah
,
J. J.
,
Vargas-Hernandez
,
N.
,
Summers
,
J. D.
, and
Kulkarni
,
S.
,
2001
, “
Collaborative Sketching (C-Sketch)—An Idea Generation Technique for Engineering Design
,”
J. Creat. Behav.
,
35
(
3
), pp.
168
198
.
26.
Yang
,
M. C.
, and
Cham
,
J. G.
,
2007
, “
An Analysis of Sketching Skill and Its Role in Early Stage Engineering Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
129
(
5
), pp.
476
482
.
27.
Offner
,
A. K.
,
Kramer
,
T. J.
, and
Winter
,
J. P.
,
1996
, “
The Effects of Facilitation, Recording, and Pauses on Group Brainstorming
,”
Small Group Res.
,
27
(
2
), pp.
283
298
.
28.
Shepherd
,
M. M.
,
Robert
,
B. O.
,
Bruce
,
R. A.
,
Jerome
,
Y.
, and
Jay
,
N.
, Jr.
,
1995
, “
Invoking Social Comparison to Improve Electronic Brainstorming: Beyond Anonymity
,”
J. Manage. Inform. Syst.
,
12
(
3
), pp.
155
170
.
29.
Shih
,
P. C.
,
Nguyen
,
D. H.
,
Hirano
,
S. H.
,
Redmiles
,
D. F.
, and
Hayes
,
G. R.
,
2009
, “
GroupMind: Supporting Idea Generation Through a Collaborative Mind-Mapping Tool
,”
ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work
,
Sanibel Island, FL
,
May 10–13
, pp.
139
148
.
30.
Liikkanen
,
L. A.
,
Kuikkaniemi
,
K.
,
Lievonen
,
P.
, and
Ojala
,
P.
,
2011
, “
Next Step in Electronic Brainstorming: Collaborative Creativity With the Web
,”
Proceedings of CHI ‘11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
,
New York
,
May 7–12
, pp.
2029
2034
.
31.
Peters
,
D.
,
Loke
,
L.
, and
Ahmadpour
,
N.
,
2020
, “
Toolkits, Cards and Games—A Review of Analogue Tools for Collaborative Ideation
,”
Int. J. CoCreat. Des. Arts
, pp.
1
25
.
32.
Golembewski
,
M.
, and
Selby
,
M.
,
2010
, “
Ideation Decks: A Card-Based Design Ideation Tool
,”
Proceedings of ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
,
New York
,
Aug. 16–20
, pp.
89
92
.
33.
Perez
,
B.
,
Hilburn
,
S.
,
Jensen
,
D.
, and
Wood
,
K. L.
,
2019
, “
Design Principle-Based Stimuli for Improving Creativity During Ideation
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
,
233
(
2
), pp.
493
503
.
34.
Yilmaz
,
S.
,
Daly
,
S. R.
,
Seifert
,
C. M.
, and
Gonzalez
,
R.
,
2015
, “
How do Designers Generate New Ideas? Design Heuristics Across Two Disciplines
,”
Des. Sci.
,
1
, E4.
35.
So
,
C.
, and
Joo
,
J.
,
2017
, “
Does a Persona Improve Creativity?
,”
Des. J.
,
24
(
4
), pp.
459
475
.
36.
Kotecha
,
M. C.
,
Chen
,
T.
,
McAdams
,
D. A.
, and
Krishnamurthy
,
V.
,
2021
, “
Design Ideation Through Speculative Fiction: Foundational Principles and Exploratory Study
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
143
(
8
), p.
080801
.
37.
Raviselvam
,
S.
,
Hölttä-Otto
,
K.
, and
Wood
,
K. L.
,
2016
, “
User Extreme Conditions to Enhance Designer Empathy and Creativity: Applications Using Visual Impairment
,”
Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Charlotte, NC
,
Aug. 21–24
, p.
V007T06A005
.
38.
Johnson
,
D. G.
,
Genco
,
N.
,
Saunders
,
M. N.
,
Williams
,
P.
,
Seepersad
,
C. C.
, and
Hölttä-Otto
,
K.
,
2014
, “
An Experimental Investigation of the Effectiveness of Empathic Experience Design for Innovative Concept Generation
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
136
(
5
), p.
051009
.
39.
She
,
J.
,
Seepersad
,
C. C.
,
Holtta-Otto
,
K.
, and
MacDonald
,
E. F.
,
2017
, “Priming Designers Leads to Prime Designs,”
Design Thinking Research. Understanding Innovation
,
H.
Plattner
,
C.
Meinel
, and
L.
Leifer
, eds.,
Springer
,
Cham
, pp.
251
273
.
40.
Liao
,
T.
, and
MacDonald
,
E. F.
,
2020
, “
Manipulating Users’ Trust of Autonomous Products With Affective Priming
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
143
(
5
), p.
051402
.
41.
Hwang
,
D.
,
Choi
,
B.
,
Bae
,
S.
, and
Park
,
W.
,
2020
, “
Mitigating Design Fixation: A Visualization Tool for Enhancing Situation Awareness
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
143
(
6
), p.
061402
.
42.
Linsey
,
J. S.
,
Wood
,
K. L.
, and
Markman
,
A. B.
,
2008
, “
Modality and Representation in Analogy
,”
Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf.
,
22
(
2
), pp.
85
100
.
43.
Linsey
,
J. S.
,
Markman
,
A. B.
, and
Wood
,
K. L.
,
2012
, “
Design by Analogy: A Study of the WordTree Method for Problem Re-Representation
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
134
(
4
), p.
041009
.
44.
Chan
,
J.
,
Fu
,
K.
,
Schunn
,
C.
,
Cagan
,
J.
,
Wood
,
K.
, and
Kotovsky
,
K.
,
2011
, “
On the Benefits and Pitfalls of Analogies for Innovative Design: Ideation Performance Based on Analogical Distance, Commonness, and Modality of Examples
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
133
(
8
), p.
081004
.
45.
Moreno
,
D. P.
,
Hernández
,
A. A.
,
Yang
,
M. C.
,
Otto
,
K. N.
,
Hölttä-Otto
,
K.
,
Linsey
,
J. S.
,
Wood
,
K. L.
, and
Linden
,
A.
,
2014
, “
Fundamental Studies in Design-by-Analogy: A Focus on Domain-Knowledge Experts and Applications to Transactional Design Problems
,”
Des. Stud.
,
35
(
3
), pp.
232
272
.
46.
Fu
,
K.
,
Chan
,
J.
,
Cagan
,
J.
,
Kotovsky
,
K.
,
Schunn
,
C.
, and
Wood
,
K.
,
2013
, “
The Meaning of “Near” and “Far”: The Impact of Structuring Design Databases and the Effect of Distance of Analogy on Design Output
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
135
(
2
), p.
021007
.
47.
Ellwood
,
S.
,
Pallier
,
G.
,
Snyder
,
A.
, and
Gallate
,
J.
,
2009
, “
The Incubation Effect: Hatching a Solution?
,”
Creat. Res. J.
,
21
(
1
), pp.
6
14
.
48.
Tsenn
,
J.
,
Atilola
,
O.
,
McAdams
,
D. A.
, and
Linsey
,
J. S.
,
2014
, “
The Effects of Time and Incubation on Design Concept Generation
,”
Des. Stud.
,
35
(
5
), pp.
500
526
.
49.
Henderson
,
D.
,
Jablokow
,
K.
,
Daly
,
S.
,
McKilligan
,
S.
,
Silk
,
E.
, and
Bracken
,
J.
,
2019
, “
Comparing the Effects of Design Interventions on the Quality of Design Concepts as a Reflection of Ideation Flexibility
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
141
(
3
), p.
031103
.
50.
Tauber
,
E.
,
1972
, “
HIT: Heuristic Ideation Technique. A Systematic Procedure for New Product Search
,”
J. Mark.
,
36
(
1
), pp.
58
61
.
51.
Pahl
,
G.
, and
Beitz
,
W.
,
2013
,
Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach
,
Springer Science & Business Media
,
London
.
52.
Rhorbach
,
B.
,
1969
, “
Kreative Nach Regeln: Methode 635, Eine Neue Technik zum Losen von Problemen
,”
Absatzwirtschaft
,
12
, pp.
73
75
.
53.
Bauer
,
J. S.
, and
Kientz
,
J. A.
,
2013
, “
DesignLibs: A Scenario-Based Design Method for Ideation
,”
CHI ‘13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
,
Paris, France
,
Apr. 27–May 2
, pp.
1955
1958
.
54.
Runco
,
M. A.
, and
Acar
,
S.
,
2012
, “
Divergent Thinking as an Indicator of Creative Potential
,”
Creat. Res. J.
,
24
(
1
), pp.
66
75
.
55.
Dean
,
D. L.
,
Hender
,
J.
,
Rodgers
,
T.
, and
Santanen
,
E.
,
2006
, “
Identifying Good Ideas: Constructs and Scales for Idea Evaluation
,”
J. Assoc. Inform. Syst.
,
7
(
10
), pp.
646
699
.
56.
Kudrowitz
,
B. M.
, and
Wallace
,
D.
,
2012
, “
Assessing the Quality of Ideas From Prolific, Early-Stage Product Ideation
,”
J. Eng. Des.
,
24
(
2
), pp.
120
139
.
57.
Parnes
,
S. J.
,
1961
, “
Effects of Extended Effort in Creative Problem Solving
,”
J. Educ. Psychol.
,
52
(
3
), pp.
117
122
.
58.
Basadur
,
M.
, and
Thompson
,
R.
,
1986
, “
Usefulness of the Ideation Principle of Extended Effort in Real World Professional and Managerial Creative Problem Solving
,”
J. Creat. Behav.
,
20
(
1
), pp.
23
24
.
59.
Kershaw
,
T.
,
Bhowmick
,
S.
,
Seepersad
,
C.
, and
Hölttä-Otto
,
K.
,
2019
, “
A Decision Tree Based Methodology for Evaluating Creativity in Engineering Design
,”
Front. Psychol.
,
10
, pp.
1
19
.
60.
Guilford
,
J. P.
,
1956
, “
The Structure of Intellect
,”
Psychol. Bull.
,
53
(
4
), pp.
267
293
.
61.
Kudrowitz
,
B.
, and
Dippo
,
C.
,
2013
, “
Getting to the Novel Ideas: Exploring the Alternative Uses Test of Divergent Thinking
,”
Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Portland, OR
,
Aug. 4–7
, p.
V005T06A013
.
62.
Kershaw
,
T. C.
,
Peterson
,
R. L.
,
McCarthy
,
M. A.
,
Young
,
A. P.
,
Seepersad
,
C. C.
,
Williams
,
P. T.
,
Hölttä-Otto
,
K.
, and
Bhowmick
,
S.
,
2015
, “
A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Examination of the Development of Innovation Capability in Undergraduate Engineering Students
,”
Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Boston, MA
,
Aug. 2–5
, p.
V003T04A008
.
63.
Simmons
,
C. C.
,
Kershaw
,
T. C.
,
LeGendre
,
A.
, and
Bhowmick
,
S.
,
2018
, “
The Influence of Physical Examples on Originality and Fixation in Engineering Design
,”
Proc. of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Quebec City
,
Aug. 26–29
, p.
V007T06A043
.
64.
Straker
,
D.
, “
The Kipling Method (5W1H)
,”
Creating Minds
, http://creatingminds.org/tools/kipling.htm, Accessed May 11, 2021.
65.
Deo
,
S.
,
Hölttä-Otto
,
K.
, and
Filz
,
G. H.
,
2020
, “
Creativity and Engineering Education: Assessing the Impact of a Multidisciplinary Project Course on Engineering Students’ Creativity
,”
Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Virtual, Online
,
Aug. 17–19
, p.
V003T03A008
.
66.
Bergendahl
,
M.
,
Magnusson
,
M.
, and
Björk
,
J.
,
2015
, “
Ideation High Performers: A Study of Motivational Factors
,”
Creat. Res. J.
,
27
(
4
), pp.
361
368
.
You do not currently have access to this content.