Technology evolution prediction is critical for designers, business managers, and entrepreneurs to make important decisions during product development planning such as R&D investment and outsourcing. In practice, designers want to supplement point forecasts with prediction intervals to assess future uncertainty and make contingency plans accordingly. However, prediction intervals generation for technology evolution has received scant attention in the literature. In this paper, we develop a generic method that uses bootstrapping to generate prediction intervals for technology evolution. The method we develop can be applied to any model that describes technology performance incremental change. We consider parameter uncertainty and data uncertainty and establish their empirical probability distributions. We determine an appropriate confidence level to generate prediction intervals through a holdout sample analysis rather than specify that the confidence level equals 0.05 as is typically done in the literature. In addition, our method provides the probability distribution of each parameter in a prediction model. The probability distribution is valuable when parameter values are associated with the impact factors of technology evolution. We validate our method to generate prediction intervals through two case studies of central processing units (CPU) and passenger airplanes. These case studies show that the prediction intervals generated by our method cover every actual data point in the holdout sample tests. We outline four steps to generate prediction intervals for technology evolution prediction in practice.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2019
Research-Article
Generating Technology Evolution Prediction Intervals Using a Bootstrap Method
Guanglu Zhang,
Guanglu Zhang
Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77840
e-mail: glzhang@tamu.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77840
e-mail: glzhang@tamu.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Douglas Allaire,
Douglas Allaire
Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77840
e-mail: dallaire@tamu.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77840
e-mail: dallaire@tamu.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Daniel A. McAdams,
Daniel A. McAdams
Fellow ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77840
e-mail: dmcadams@tamu.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77840
e-mail: dmcadams@tamu.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Venkatesh Shankar
Venkatesh Shankar
Center for Retailing Studies,
Mays Business School,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77840
e-mail: vshankar@mays.tamu.edu
Mays Business School,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77840
e-mail: vshankar@mays.tamu.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Guanglu Zhang
Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77840
e-mail: glzhang@tamu.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77840
e-mail: glzhang@tamu.edu
Douglas Allaire
Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77840
e-mail: dallaire@tamu.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77840
e-mail: dallaire@tamu.edu
Daniel A. McAdams
Fellow ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77840
e-mail: dmcadams@tamu.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77840
e-mail: dmcadams@tamu.edu
Venkatesh Shankar
Center for Retailing Studies,
Mays Business School,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77840
e-mail: vshankar@mays.tamu.edu
Mays Business School,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77840
e-mail: vshankar@mays.tamu.edu
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received April 29, 2018; final manuscript received October 24, 2018; published online January 31, 2019. Assoc. Editor: Harrison M. Kim.
J. Mech. Des. Jun 2019, 141(6): 061401 (9 pages)
Published Online: January 31, 2019
Article history
Received:
April 29, 2018
Revised:
October 24, 2018
Citation
Zhang, G., Allaire, D., McAdams, D. A., and Shankar, V. (January 31, 2019). "Generating Technology Evolution Prediction Intervals Using a Bootstrap Method." ASME. J. Mech. Des. June 2019; 141(6): 061401. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4041860
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Multi-Split Configuration Design for Fluid-Based Thermal Management Systems
J. Mech. Des (February 2025)
Related Articles
Polynomial Chaos Expansion-based Uncertainty Model for Fast Assessment of Gas Turbine Aero-engines Thrust Regulation: a Sparse Regression Approach
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (January,0001)
An Approach for Testing Methods for Modeling Uncertainty
J. Mech. Des (September,2006)
On the Uncertainty of Wind Power Predictions—Analysis of the Forecast Accuracy and Statistical Distribution of Errors
J. Sol. Energy Eng (May,2005)
A Bayesian Approach to Reliability-Based Optimization With Incomplete Information
J. Mech. Des (July,2006)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Performance-Based Expert Judgement Weighting Using Moment Methods (PSAM-0264)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Probabilistic Modeling of Aircraft Crash and Impact on Ignalina NPP Considering Uncertainty (PSAM-0471)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Uncertainty in Ductile Fracture Initiation Toughness ( J Ic ) Resulting From Compliance Measurement
Application of Automation Technology in Fatigue and Fracture Testing and Analysis