Applying previous solutions to solve new problems is a core aspect of design, and designers routinely use informal analogies to solve a wide variety of design problems. However, when the goal is to consider a large quantity and variety of creative solutions, relying on informal analogy recall may limit the analogy and solution breadth. This paper reports on work to identify the analogy connections that designers make during concept generation such that computational support can be employed to intentionally retrieve analogical solutions from existing systems. A study of the types of similarity that are commonly used to draw design analogies, and whether some types of similarity are used more frequently in compound analogy versus single analogy, was designed and implemented. The experiment consists of a design task and a follow up interview. Ten mechanical engineering graduate students specializing in design participated. Eight different types of analogical similarity are observed, and each type is equally likely to be used to form either single or compound analogies. Notably, the flow behavior was a commonly observed type of abstract similarity that helped designers notice connections across domains, suggesting the value of capturing and retrieving (computationally) flow behavior abstractions for the purpose of relating systems analogically.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2016
Research-Article
Discovery of Mental Metadata Used for Analogy Formation in Function-Based Design
Ryan M. Arlitt,
Ryan M. Arlitt
School of Mechanical, Industrial, and
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
204 Rogers Hall,
Corvallis, OR 97331
e-mail: arlittr@oregonstate.edu
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
204 Rogers Hall,
Corvallis, OR 97331
e-mail: arlittr@oregonstate.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Anthony A. Nix,
Anthony A. Nix
School of Mechanical, Industrial, and
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
204 Rogers Hall,
Corvallis, OR 97331
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
204 Rogers Hall,
Corvallis, OR 97331
Search for other works by this author on:
Chiradeep Sen,
Chiradeep Sen
Department of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
Florida Institute of Technology,
Melbourne, FL 32901
Aerospace Engineering,
Florida Institute of Technology,
Melbourne, FL 32901
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert B. Stone
Robert B. Stone
School of Mechanical, Industrial, and
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
204 Rogers Hall,
Corvallis, OR 97331
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
204 Rogers Hall,
Corvallis, OR 97331
Search for other works by this author on:
Ryan M. Arlitt
School of Mechanical, Industrial, and
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
204 Rogers Hall,
Corvallis, OR 97331
e-mail: arlittr@oregonstate.edu
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
204 Rogers Hall,
Corvallis, OR 97331
e-mail: arlittr@oregonstate.edu
Anthony A. Nix
School of Mechanical, Industrial, and
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
204 Rogers Hall,
Corvallis, OR 97331
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
204 Rogers Hall,
Corvallis, OR 97331
Chiradeep Sen
Department of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
Florida Institute of Technology,
Melbourne, FL 32901
Aerospace Engineering,
Florida Institute of Technology,
Melbourne, FL 32901
Robert B. Stone
School of Mechanical, Industrial, and
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
204 Rogers Hall,
Corvallis, OR 97331
Manufacturing Engineering,
Oregon State University,
204 Rogers Hall,
Corvallis, OR 97331
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Design Theory and Methodology Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received February 5, 2016; final manuscript received June 6, 2016; published online August 30, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Katja Holtta-Otto.
J. Mech. Des. Oct 2016, 138(10): 101110 (11 pages)
Published Online: August 30, 2016
Article history
Received:
February 5, 2016
Revised:
June 6, 2016
Citation
Arlitt, R. M., Nix, A. A., Sen, C., and Stone, R. B. (August 30, 2016). "Discovery of Mental Metadata Used for Analogy Formation in Function-Based Design." ASME. J. Mech. Des. October 2016; 138(10): 101110. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034090
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
Large-Scale Needfinding: Methods of Increasing User-Generated Needs From Large Populations
J. Mech. Des (July,2015)
How Concept Selection Tools Impact the Development of Creative Ideas in Engineering Design Education
J. Mech. Des (May,2018)
Comparing Ideation Techniques for Beginning Designers
J. Mech. Des (October,2016)
Creative Contributions of the Methods of Inventive Principles of TRIZ and BioTRIZ to Problem Solving
J. Mech. Des (August,2017)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Stimulating Creative Design Alternatives Using Customer Values
Decision Making in Engineering Design
Cyber-Physical Systems, Blended Tool Environments, and Playful Creativity
Advances in Computers and Information in Engineering Research, Volume 2
Engineering Consultancy Services
Marketing of Engineering Consultancy Services: A Global Perspective