1-20 of 17012
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Articles
Accepted Manuscript
Article Type: Research Papers
J. Eng. Mater. Technol.
Paper No: MATS-21-1037
Published Online: April 20, 2021
Image
Shock tube schematic with complete instrumentation   Shock tube schematic w...
Published Online: April 19, 2021
Fig. 1 Shock tube schematic with complete instrumentation Shock tube schematic with complete instrumentation More
Image
Pressure histories from shock tube experiments for different bursting press...
Published Online: April 19, 2021
Fig. 2 Pressure histories from shock tube experiments for different bursting pressures: ( a ) 7.67 ± 0.3 bar, ( b ) 9.01 ± 0.3 bar, and ( c ) 10.81 ± 0.3 bar Pressure histories from shock tube experiments for different bursting pressures: (a) 7.67 ± 0.3 bar, (b) 9.01 ± 0.3 bar, and (c) 10.81 ± 0... More
Image
True stress-strain curve of AA 5052-H32 sheet along 0 deg, 45 deg, and 90 d...
Published Online: April 19, 2021
Fig. 3 True stress-strain curve of AA 5052-H32 sheet along 0 deg, 45 deg, and 90 deg to RD True stress-strain curve of AA 5052-H32 sheet along 0 deg, 45 deg, and 90 deg to RD More
Image
FE simulation stages of shock tube forming using a rigid body striker   FE ...
Published Online: April 19, 2021
Fig. 4 FE simulation stages of shock tube forming using a rigid body striker FE simulation stages of shock tube forming using a rigid body striker More
Image
Stages and FE mesh during forming processes: ( a ) before forming and ( b )...
Published Online: April 19, 2021
Fig. 5 Stages and FE mesh during forming processes: ( a ) before forming and ( b ) after forming Stages and FE mesh during forming processes: (a) before forming and (b) after forming More
Image
Step by step procedure to evaluate the material constants in flow stress eq...
Published Online: April 19, 2021
Fig. 6 Step by step procedure to evaluate the material constants in flow stress equations Step by step procedure to evaluate the material constants in flow stress equations More
Image
Identification of rate-dependent material parameters by curve fitting metho...
Published Online: April 19, 2021
Fig. 7 Identification of rate-dependent material parameters by curve fitting method for different striker velocities: ( a ) 49.78 m/s, ( b ) 58.75 m/s, and ( c ) 67.82 m/s Identification of rate-dependent material parameters by curve fitting method for different striker velocities: (a) 49.78 m/s... More
Image
Strain path evolution during shock tube forming of AA5052-H32 sheet   Strai...
Published Online: April 19, 2021
Fig. 8 Strain path evolution during shock tube forming of AA5052-H32 sheet Strain path evolution during shock tube forming of AA5052-H32 sheet More
Image
Prediction of dome height and validation with experiments for different str...
Published Online: April 19, 2021
Fig. 9 Prediction of dome height and validation with experiments for different striker velocities: ( a ) 49.78 m/s, ( b ) 58.75 m/s, and ( c ) 67.82 m/s Prediction of dome height and validation with experiments for different striker velocities: (a) 49.78 m/s, (b) 58.75 m/s, and (c) 67.82 m/s More
Image
Distribution of damage parameter ( C i  ) along the radial distance in roll...
Published Online: April 19, 2021
Fig. 10 Distribution of damage parameter ( C i ) along the radial distance in rolling direction Distribution of damage parameter (Ci) along the radial distance in rolling direction More
Image
Major strain evolution with striker displacement at the necked location: ( ...
Published Online: April 19, 2021
Fig. 11 Major strain evolution with striker displacement at the necked location: ( a ) Hollomon model, ( b ) CS model, ( c ) JC model, and ( d ) MJC model Major strain evolution with striker displacement at the necked location: (a) Hollomon model, (b) CS model, (c) JC model, and (d) MJC model More
Image
( a )–( d ) Comparison of the fracture pattern predicted by failure models ...
Published Online: April 19, 2021
Fig. 12 ( a )–( d ) Comparison of the fracture pattern predicted by failure models in comparison with experimental observation at V 2 = 58.75 m/s (a)–(d) Comparison of the fracture pattern predicted by failure models in comparison with experimental observation at V2 = 58.75 m/s More
Image
Image
Comparison of  ɛ   f   predicted by failure models at V 2  = 58.75 m/s   Co...
Published Online: April 19, 2021
Fig. 13 Comparison of ɛ f predicted by failure models at V 2 = 58.75 m/s Comparison of ɛf predicted by failure models at V2 = 58.75 m/s More
Image
Comparison of the failure pattern predicted by flow stress models in compar...
Published Online: April 19, 2021
Fig. 14 Comparison of the failure pattern predicted by flow stress models in comparison to the experimental observation at V 3 = 67.82 m/s Comparison of the failure pattern predicted by flow stress models in comparison to the experimental observation at V3 = 67.82 m/s More
Image
Comparison of  ɛ   f   predicted by flow stress models at velocity V 3  = 6...
Published Online: April 19, 2021
Fig. 15 Comparison of ɛ f predicted by flow stress models at velocity V 3 = 67.82 m/s Comparison of ɛf predicted by flow stress models at velocity V3 = 67.82 m/s More
Image
Effects of the temperature and strain rate factors on the post-yielding beh...
Published Online: April 19, 2021
Fig. 1 Effects of the temperature and strain rate factors on the post-yielding behavior of the solder alloy Effects of the temperature and strain rate factors on the post-yielding behavior of the solder alloy More
Image
Prediction of the output (flow stress) by the neural network model given th...
Published Online: April 19, 2021
Fig. 2 Prediction of the output (flow stress) by the neural network model given the inputs (loading conditions and applied strain) Prediction of the output (flow stress) by the neural network model given the inputs (loading conditions and applied strain) More
Image
Coupling between the neural network model and the user subroutine UHARD in ...
Published Online: April 19, 2021
Fig. 3 Coupling between the neural network model and the user subroutine UHARD in the finite element code Abaqus Coupling between the neural network model and the user subroutine UHARD in the finite element code Abaqus More