High-pressure waterjets have emerged as a viable method for surface texturing, cleaning, and peening of metallic materials. As the material advancements continue, research into alternate surface processing methods must strive to keep pace. One material in particular that has experienced an increase in use in the biomedical and aerospace industries is titanium—due largely to its high strength to weight ratio and corrosion resistance. In this paper, surface preparation of a titanium alloy using waterjet and the water-air jet nozzles at pressures up to 600 MPa was evaluated. A parametric study was performed based on the supply pressure, standoff distance, traverse rate, and applied air flow rate. An analysis of variance was performed on the resulting experimental set to identify the key parameters contributing to the material erosion rates and resulting surface roughness parameters. The supply pressure was found to be the primary contributor to the erosive characteristics of the waterjet followed by the traverse rate. These parameters together govern the total energy per unit area transferred to the workpiece.

1.
Knapp
,
J. K.
, and
Taylor
,
T. A.
, 1996, “
Waterjet Roughened Surface Analysis and Bond Strength
,”
Surf. Coat. Technol.
0257-8972,
86–87
, pp.
22
27
.
2.
Louis
,
H.
,
Polak
,
H.
,
Pude
,
F.
, and
Schenk
,
A.
, 2003, “
Pure WJ Cleaning Process Characterization: Approach and Technologies
,”
Sixth International Conference of Management of Innovative Technologies
, MIT, MA.
3.
Hashish
,
M.
,
Steele
,
D. E.
, and
Bothell
,
D. H.
, 1997, “
Machining With Super-Pressure (690 MPa) Waterjets
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
0890-6955,
37
(
4
), pp.
465
479
.
4.
Hashish
,
M.
, 1999, “
Cutting With Waterjets at 690 MPa
,”
High Pressure Technology
, ASME PVP-Vol.
384
, pp.
33
39
.
5.
Hashish
,
M.
et al.
, 2001, “
Method and Apparatus for Fluidjet Formation
,” U.S. Patent No. 6,280,302.
6.
Kunaporn
,
S.
, and
Ramulu
,
M.
, 2001, “
Ultra High Pressure Waterjet Peening, Part I: Surface Texture
,”
Proceedings of the WJTA American Waterjet Conference
, Vol.
1
, pp.
90
95
.
7.
Kunaporn
,
S.
,
Chillman
,
A.
,
Ramulu
,
M.
, and
Hashish
,
M.
, 2008, “
Effect of Waterjet Formation on Surface Preparation and Profiling of Aluminum Alloy
,”
Wear
0043-1648,
265
, pp.
176
185
.
8.
Hashish
,
M.
,
Chillman
,
A.
, and
Ramulu
,
M.
, 2005, “
Waterjet Peening at 600 MPa: A First Investigation
,”
Proceedings of the IMECE: 2005 ASME Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
.
9.
Chillman
,
A.
,
Ramulu
,
M.
, and
Hashish
,
M.
, 2007, “
Waterjet Peening and Surface Preparation at 600 MPa: A Preliminary Experimental Study
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
129
, pp.
485
490
.
10.
Momber
,
A. W.
, 2000, “
Concrete Failure Due to Air-Water Jet Impingement
,”
J. Mater. Sci.
0022-2461,
35
, pp.
2785
2789
.
11.
Hancox
,
N. L.
, and
Brunton
,
J. H.
, 1966, “
The Erosion of Solids by the Repeated Impact of Liquid Drops
,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London
0962-8428,
260
, pp.
121
139
.
12.
Yanaida
,
K.
, and
Ohashi
,
S. A.
, 1980, “
Flow Characteristics of Water Jets
,”
Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Jet Cutting Technology
, Hannover, Germany, pp.
33
44
.
13.
Yanaida
,
K.
, and
Ohashi
,
S. A.
, 1978, “
Flow Characteristics of Water Jets in Air
,”
Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Jet Cutting Technology
, Canterbury, UK, pp.
39
53
.
You do not currently have access to this content.