Abstract

Brush seals offer a superior sealing effectiveness compared to labyrinth seals. However, widespread use of brush seals is constrained by deleterious behaviors such as pressure-stiffening and hysteresis. For the latter, the bristles bend during the shaft incursion process and do not fully recover during the shaft retraction process. An opening gap is created, which increases seal leakage unless the pressure load drops to a certain level. In this work, analytical and numerical models based on a single bristle are proposed to capture the seal's response to shaft displacement with and without pressure loading. The models are validated using static stiffness tests at an unpressurized condition from literature. The main results show that modeling of the backing ring friction is essential to capture the bristle hang-up behavior. Shaft friction dominates at unpressurized conditions, while backing ring friction dominates at high pressure loading. An expression for shaft hang-up displacement has been derived. A sensitivity study shows that seals with shallow lay angle, short bristle length, and large bristle diameter are less prone to hang-up problems. The models developed in the present framework have been shown to qualitatively capture the pressure stiffening, hysteresis, bristle hang-up, and shaft rotation effects.

References

1.
Chupp
,
R. E.
,
Ghasripoor
,
F.
,
Turnquist
,
N. A.
,
Demiroglu
,
M.
, and
Aksi
,
M. F.
,
2002
, “
Advanced Seals for Industrial Turbine Applications: Dynamic Seal Development
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
18
(
6
), pp.
1260
1266
.10.2514/2.6061
2.
Chupp
,
R. E.
,
Hendricks
,
R. C.
,
Lattime
,
S. B.
, and
Steinetz
,
B.
,
2006
, “
Sealing in Turbomachinery
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
22
(
2
), pp.
313
349
.10.2514/1.17778
3.
Aksit
,
M. F.
,
2012
, “
Brush Seals and Common Issues in Brush Seal Applications
,” NATO Paper No.
NATO RTO-AVT-188-KN4
.https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/32328336.pdf
4.
Aksit
,
M. F.
,
Kandemir
,
I.
,
Dogu
,
Y.
, and
Kizil
,
H.
,
2006
, “
An Investigation of Pressure Stiffness Coupling in Brush Seals
,”
Proceedings of the Eleventh International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery
, Honolulu, HI, Feb. 26–Mar. 2, Paper No. ISROMAC-11-4.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289412313_An_investigation_of_pressure_stiffness_coupling_in_brush_seals
5.
Demiroglu
,
M.
,
Gursoy
,
M.
, and
Tichy
,
J. A.
,
2007
, “
An Investigation of Tip Force Characteristics of Brush Seals
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2007-28042.10.1115/GT2007-28042
6.
Stango
,
R. J.
,
Zhao
,
H.
, and
Shia
,
C. Y.
,
2003
, “
Analysis of Contact Mechanics for Rotor-Bristle Interference of Brush Seal
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
125
(
2
), pp.
414
421
.10.1115/1.1510879
7.
Zhao
,
H.
, and
Stango
,
R. J.
,
2004
, “
Effect of Flow-Induced Radial Load on Brush Seal/Rotor Contact Mechanics
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
126
(
1
), pp.
208
215
.10.1115/1.1609492
8.
Zhao
,
H.
, and
Stango
,
R. J.
,
2007
, “
Analytical Approach for Investigating Bristle/Backplate Hysteresis Phenomenon in Brush Seals
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
23
(
2
), pp.
273
282
.10.2514/1.20682
9.
Turner
,
M. T.
,
Chew
,
J. W.
, and
Long
,
C. A.
,
1998
, “
Experimental Investigation and Mathematical Modeling of Clearance Brush Seals
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
120
(
3
), pp.
573
579
.10.1115/1.2818185
10.
Chen
,
L. H.
,
Wood
,
P. E.
,
Jones
,
T. V.
, and
Chew
,
J. W.
,
1999
, “
An Iterative CFD and Mechanical Brush Seal Model and Comparison With Experimental Results
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
121
(
4
), pp.
656
662
.10.1115/1.2818522
11.
Yang
,
J.
,
Huang
,
S.
,
Suo
,
S.
, and
Wang
,
A.
,
2020
, “
Investigating the Frictional Force Distributions and Inter-Stage Imbalance of a Two-Stage Brush Seal
,”
AIP Adv.
,
10
(
3
), p.
035323
.10.1063/1.5139260
12.
Huang
,
S.
,
Suo
,
S.
,
Li
,
Y.
, and
Wang
,
Y.
,
2014
, “
Theoretical and Experimental Investigation on Tip Forces and Temperature Distributions of the Brush Seal Coupled Aerodynamic Force
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
136
(
5
), p.
052502
.10.1115/1.4026074
13.
Duran
,
E. T.
,
2022
, “
Brush Seal Contact Force Theory and Correlation With Tests
,”
Alexandria Eng. J.
,
61
(
4
), pp.
2925
2938
.10.1016/j.aej.2021.08.027
14.
Duran
,
E. T.
,
Aksit
,
M. F.
, and
Ozmusul
,
M.
,
2015
, “
Brush Seal Free State Stiffness Analyses, Tests and Inspection on Dynamic Effects
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2015-44069.10.1115/GT2015-44069
15.
Duran
,
E. T.
,
Aksit
,
M. F.
, and
Ozmusul
,
M.
,
2016
, “
Brush Seal Structural Analysis and Correlation With Tests for Turbine Conditions
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
138
(
5
), p.
052502
.10.1115/1.4031565
16.
Basu
,
P.
,
Datta
,
A.
,
Loewenthal
,
R.
,
Short
,
J.
, and
Johnson
,
R.
,
1994
, “
Hysteresis and Bristle Stiffening Effects in Brush Seals
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
10
(
4
), pp.
569
575
.10.2514/3.23810
17.
Crudgington
,
P.
, and
Bowsher
,
A.
,
2002
, “
Brush Seal Pack Hysteresis
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2002-3794.10.2514/6.2002-3794
18.
Crudgington
,
P.
,
Bowsher
,
A.
,
Kirk
,
T.
, and
Walia
,
J.
,
2012
, “
Brush Seal Hysteresis
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2012-4003.10.2514/6.2012-4003
19.
Flower
,
R.
,
1990
, “
Brush Seal Development System
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 90-2143.10.2514/6.90-2143
20.
Aksit
,
M. F.
,
1998
, “
A Computational Study of Brush Seal Contact Loads With Friction
,”
Ph.D. thesis
,
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
,
Troy, NY
.https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998PhDT.......171A/abstract
21.
Chew
,
J. W.
,
Lapworth
,
B. L.
, and
Millener
,
P. J.
,
1995
, “
Mathematical Modeling of Brush Seals
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
16
(
6
), pp.
493
500
.10.1016/0142-727X(95)00061-T
22.
Guardino
,
C.
, and
Chew
,
J. W.
,
2004
, “
Numerical Simulation of Three-Dimensional Bristle Bending in Brush Seals
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
127
(
3
), pp.
583
591
.10.1115/1.1850943
23.
Phan
,
H. M.
, and
He
,
L.
,
2022
, “
Efficient Modeling of Mistuned Blade Aeroelasticity Using Fully-Coupled Two-Scale Method
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
,
115
, p.
103777
.10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2022.103777
24.
Phan
,
H. M.
, and
He
,
L.
,
2022
, “
Phasing Structural and Aerodynamic Mistuning for Leveraging Aeroelastic Performance
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2022-82168.10.1115/GT2022-82168
25.
Phan
,
H. M.
,
2022
, “
Modeling of a Turbine Bladerow With Stagger Angle Variation Using the Multi-Fidelity Influence Superposition Method
,”
Aerosp. Sci. Technol.
,
121
, p.
107318
.10.1016/j.ast.2021.107318
26.
Phan
,
H. M.
, and
He
,
L.
,
2021
, “
Efficient Steady and Unsteady Flow Modeling for Arbitrarily Mis-Staggered Bladerow Under Influence of Inlet Distortion
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
143
(
7
), p.
071009
.10.1115/1.4050364
27.
Kang
,
Y.
,
Liu
,
M.
,
Hu
,
X.
,
Kao-Walter
,
S.
, and
Zhang
,
B.
,
2019
, “
Theoretical and Numerical Investigation Into Brush Seal Hysteresis Without Pressure Differential
,”
Adv. Compos. Lett.
,
28
, p.
096369351988538
.10.1177/0963693519885386
28.
Franceschini
,
G.
,
Morgan
,
J. J.
,
Jones
,
T. V.
, and
Gillespie
,
D. R.
,
2006
, “
A Slow-Speed Rotating Test Facility for Characterising the Stiffness of Brush Seals
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2006-91335.10.1115/GT2006-91335
29.
Israelachvili
,
J. N.
,
Chen
,
Y. L.
, and
Yoshizawa
,
H.
,
1994
, “
Relationship Between Adhesion and Friction Forces
,”
J. Adhes. Sci. Technol.
,
8
(
11
), pp.
1231
1249
.10.1163/156856194X00582
30.
Lelli
,
D.
,
Chew
,
J. W.
, and
Cooper
,
P.
,
2005
, “
Combined Three-Dimensional Fluid Dynamics and Mechanical Modeling of Brush Seals
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
128
(
1
), pp.
188
195
.10.1115/1.2103093
31.
Liu
,
Y.
,
Chew
,
J. W.
,
Pekris
,
M. J.
, and
Kong
,
X.
,
2020
, “
The Effect of Inlet Swirl on Brush Seal Bristle Deflections and Stability
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
142
(
7
), p.
071002
.10.1115/1.4046696
32.
Liu
,
Y.
,
Dong
,
W.
,
Chew
,
J.
,
Pekris
,
M.
,
Yue
,
B.
, and
Kong
,
X.
,
2022
, “
Flow Conditioning to Control Effects of Inlet Swirl on Brush Seal Performance in Gas Turbine Engines
,”
Front. Energy Res.
,
9
, p.
815152
.10.3389/fenrg.2021.815152
33.
Franceschini
,
G.
,
Jones
,
T. V.
, and
Gillespie
,
D. R.
,
2010
, “
Improved Understanding of Blow-Down in Filament Seals
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
132
(
4
), p.
041004
.10.1115/1.3213552
34.
Pekris
,
M. J.
,
Franceschini
,
G.
, and
Gillespie
,
D. R.
,
2011
, “
Effect of Geometric Changes in an Idealised Contacting Brush Seal Bristle Pack on Typical Key Performance Measures
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2011-46492.10.1115/GT2011-46492
35.
Zhao
,
H.
, and
Stango
,
R. J.
,
2007
, “
Role of Distributed Interbristle Friction Force on Brush Seal Hysteresis
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
129
(
1
), pp.
199
204
.10.1115/1.2401218
36.
Aksoy
,
S.
, and
Aksit
,
M.
,
2010
, “
Evaluation of Pressure-Stiffness Coupling in Brush Seals
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2010-6831.10.2514/6.2010-6831
37.
Long
,
C. A.
, and
Marras
,
Y.
,
1995
, “
Contact Force Measurements Under a Brush Seal
,”
ASME
Paper No. 95-GT-211.10.1115/95-GT-211
You do not currently have access to this content.