Imaging of aeroacoustic noise sources is routinely accomplished with geometrically fixed phased arrays of microphones. Several decades of research have gone into improvement and optimization of sensor layouts, selection of basis models, and deconvolution algorithms to produce sharper and more localized images of sound-producing regions in space. This paper explores an extension to conventional phased array measurements that uses slowly, continuously moving microphone arrays with and without coupling to rigid fixed arrays to improve image quality and better describe noise mechanisms on turbofan engine sources such as jet exhausts and turbomachinery components. Three approaches are compared in the paper: fixed receiver beamforming (FRBF), continuous-scan beamforming (CSBF), and multireference CSBF (MRCSBF). The third takes advantage of transfer function matrices formed between fixed and moving sensors to achieve effective virtual arrays with spatial density one to two orders of magnitude higher, with practical sensor budgets and scan speeds. The MRCSBF technique produces array sidelobe rejection that approaches the theoretical array pattern of a continuous two-dimensional (2D) aperture. The implications of this finding are that better source localization may be achieved with conventional delay and sum (DAS) beamforming (BF) with practical sensor budgets, and that an improved starting image of the sound source can be provided to deconvolution algorithms. These findings are demonstrated on analytical and experimental examples from a low-cost rotating phased array using point sound sources, as well as linear scanning array experiments of an impinging jets point source and a near-sonic jet nozzle exhaust.

References

1.
ATAG, 2019, “
Environmental Efficiency—Noise
,” Aviation Benefits Beyond Borders Website, Air Transport Action Group, Geneva, Switzerland, accessed Jan. 28, 2019, http://aviationbenefits.org/environmental-efficiency/noise/
2.
Brooks
,
T. F.
, and
Humphreys
,
W. M.
,
2006
, “
A Deconvolution Approach for the Mapping of Acoustic Sources (DAMAS) Determined From Phased Microphone Arrays
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
294
(
4–5
), pp.
856
879
.
3.
Sijtsma
,
P.
,
2007
, “
CLEAN Based on Spatial Source Coherence
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2007-3436.
4.
Dougherty
,
R.
,
2005
, “
Extension of DAMAS and Benefits and Limitations of Deconvolution in Beamforming
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2005-2961.
5.
Papamoschou
,
D.
,
2011
, “
Imaging of Distributed Directional Noise Sources
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
330
(
10
), pp.
2265
2280
.
6.
Christiansen
,
J. J.
, and
Hald
,
J.
,
2004
, “
Beamforming
,” Brüel and Kjær Technical Review No. 1.
7.
Vold
,
H.
,
Shah
,
P. N.
,
Davis
,
J.
,
Bremner
,
P. G.
,
McLaughlin
,
D.
,
Morris
,
P.
,
Veltin
,
J.
, and
McKinley
,
R.
,
2010
, “
High-Resolution Continuous Scan Acoustical Holography Applied to High-Speed Jet Noise
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2010-3754.
8.
Shah
,
P.
,
Vold
,
H.
, and
Yang
,
M.
,
2011
, “
Reconstruction of Far-Field Noise Using Multireference Acoustical Holography Measurements of High-Speed Jets
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2011-2772.
9.
Stephens
,
D. B.
, and
Vold
,
H.
,
2014
, “
Order Tracking Signal Processing for Open Rotor Acoustics
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
333
(
16
), pp.
3818
3830
.
10.
Shah
,
P. N.
,
Vold
,
H.
,
Hensley
,
D.
,
Envia
,
E.
, and
Stephens
,
D.
,
2015
, “
A High-Resolution Continuous-Scan Acoustic Measurement Method for Turbofan Engine Applications
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
137
(
12
), p.
121002
.
11.
Vold
,
H.
, and
Leuridan
,
J.
,
1993
, “
High Resolution Order Tracking at Extreme Slew Rates, Using Kalman Tracking Filters
,”
SAE
Paper No. 931288.
12.
Rosshikin
,
A. A.
,
Khaletskiy
,
Y. D.
, and
Mileshin
,
V. I.
,
2014
, “
Far-Field Fan Noise Estimation With the Application of 3D Aeroacoustic Calculation
,”
29th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences
, St. Petersburg, Russia, Sept. 7–12, Paper No. 0632.http://www.icas.org/ICAS_ARCHIVE/ICAS2014/data/papers/2014_0632_paper.pdf
13.
Lee
,
M.
, and
Bolton
,
J. S.
,
2006
, “
Scan-Based Near-Field Acoustical Holography and Partial Field Decomposition in the Presence of Noise and Source Level Variation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
,
119
(
1
), pp.
382
393
.
14.
Lee
,
M.
, and
Bolton
,
J. S.
,
2007
, “
Source Characterization of a Subsonic Jet by Using Near-Field Acoustical Holography
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
,
121
(
2
), pp.
967
977
.
15.
Gerhold
,
C. H.
,
Clark
,
L. R.
,
Dunn
,
M. H.
, and
Tweed
,
J.
,
2006
, “
Investigation of Acoustical Shielding by a Wedge-Shaped Airframe
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
294
(
1–2
), pp.
49
63
.
16.
Papamoschou
,
D.
,
2011
, “
Wavepacket Modeling of the Jet Noise Source
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2011-2835.
17.
Truong
,
A.
, and
Papamoschou
,
D.
,
2015
, “
Harmonic and Broadband Separation of Noise From a Small Ducted Fan
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2015-3282.
18.
Vold
,
H.
,
Shah
,
P.
,
Morris
,
P.
,
Du
,
Y.
, and
Papamoschou
,
D.
,
2012
, “
Axisymmetry and Azimuthal Modes in Jet Noise
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2012-2214.
19.
Truong
,
A.
, and
Papamoschou
,
D.
,
2014
, “
Experimental Simulation of Ducted Fan Acoustics at Very Small Scale
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2014-0718.
You do not currently have access to this content.