Diesel particulate filters (DPFs) are well assessed aftertreatment devices, equipping almost every modern diesel engine on the market to comply with today’s stringent emission standards. However, an accurate estimation of soot loading, which is instrumental to ensuring optimal performance of the whole engine-after-treatment assembly, is still a major challenge. In fact, several highly coupled physical-chemical phenomena occur at the same time, and a vast number of engine and exhaust dependent parameters make this task even more daunting. This challenge may be solved with models characterized by different degrees of detail (0-D to 3-D) depending on the specific application. However, the use of real-time, but accurate enough models, may be the primary hurdle that has to be overcome when confronted with advanced exhaust emissions control challenges, such as the integration of the DPF with the engine or other critical aftertreatment components (selective catalytic reduction or other NOx control components), or to properly develop model-based OBD sensors. This paper aims at addressing real time DPF modeling issues with special regard to key parameter settings, by using the 1-D code called ExhAUST (exhaust aftertreatment unified simulation tool), which was jointly developed by the University of Rome Tor Vergata and West Virginia University. ExhAUST is characterized by a novel and unique full analytical treatment of the wall that allows a highly detailed representation of the soot loading evolution inside the DPF porous matrix. Numerical results are compared with experimental data gathered at West Virginia University engine laboratory using a MY2004 Mack®MP7-355E, an 11 liter, 6-cylinder, inline heavy-duty diesel engine coupled to a Johnson Matthey CCRT diesel oxidation catalyst + CDPF, catalyzed DPF exhaust aftertreatment system. To that aim, the engine test bench was equipped with a DPF weighing system to track soot loading over a specifically developed engine operating procedure. Results indicate that the model is accurate enough to capture soot loading and back pressure histories with regard to different steady state engine operating points, without a need for any tuning procedure of the key parameters. Thus, the use of ExhAUST for application to advanced after-treatment control appears to be a promising tool at this stage.

References

1.
Johnson
,
T.
, 2009,
“Review of Diesel Emissions and Control,”
SAE Paper 2009-01-0121.
2.
“Summary of Worldwide Diesel Emission Standards,” Revision 2009, http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/obd.phphttp://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/obd.php.
3.
Ardanese
,
M.
,
Ardanese
,
R.
,
Adams
,
T.
,
Besch
,
M. C.
,
Sathi
,
V.
,
Shade
,
B.
,
Gautam
,
M.
,
Miyasato
,
M.
, and
Oshinuga
,
A.
, 2009, “Emissions of NOx, NH3 and Fuel Consumption Using High and Low Engine-Out NOx Calibrations to Meet 2010 Heavy Duty Diesel Engine Emission Standards,” SAE Paper 2009-01-0909.
4.
Rice
,
M.
,
Kramer
,
J.
,
Mueller
,
R.
, and
Mueller-Haas
,
K.
, 2008,
“Development of an Integrated NOx and PM Reduction Aftertreatment System: SCRi for Advanced Diesel Engines,”
EMITEC GmbH, SAE Paper 2008-01-1321.
5.
Ohashi
,
N.
,
Nakatani
,
K.
,
Asanuma
,
T.
,
Fukuma
,
T.
,
Matsubara
,
H.
,
Sobue
,
Y.
, and
Watanabe
,
M.
, 2008, “Development of Next-Generation NOx Reduction System for Diesel Exhaust Emission,” SAE Paper 2008-01-0065.
6.
“On-Board Diagnostics-United States,” Revision 2009, http://www.dieselnet.com/standardshttp://www.dieselnet.com/standards.
7.
Rose
,
D.
, and
Boger
,
T.
, 2009, “Different Approaches to Soot Estimation as Key Requirement for DPF Applications,” SAE Paper 2009-01-1262.
8.
Premchand
,
K. C.
,
Johnson
,
J. H.
,
Yang
,
S. L.
,
Triana
,
A. P.
, and
Baumgard
,
K. J.
, 2007, “A Study of the Filtration and Oxidation Characteristics of a Diesel Oxidation Catalyst and a Catalyzed Particulate Filter,” SAE Paper 2007-01-1123.
9.
Besch
,
M. C.
,
Thiruvengadam
,
A. P.
,
Carder
,
D.
,
Littera
,
D.
,
Mulone
,
V.
,
Tikkanen
,
J.
, and
Gautam
,
M.
,
“In-Line, Real-Time Exhaust PM Emissions Sensor - OBD and DPF Control System Applications,”
20th CRC On-Road Vehicle Emissions Workshop
,
San Diego, CA
, March 22–24, 2010.
10.
Bissett
,
E. J.
, 1984,
“Mathematical Model of the Thermal Regeneration of a Wall-Flow Monolith Diesel Particulate Filter,”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
,
39
(
7/8
), pp.
1233
1244
.
11.
Konstandopoulous
,
A. G.
, and
Kostoglou
,
M.
, 2010, “Computationally Fast Implementations of Convection, Diffusion and Chemical Reaction Phenomena in Diesel Particulate Filters,” SAE Paper 2010-01-0890.
12.
Cordiner
,
S.
,
De Simone
,
G.
, and
Mulone
,
V.
, 2010, “A General 3D Model to Analyze Particle Transport Into a Partial-Flow-Particulate-Filter,” SAE Paper 2010-01-0881.
13.
Mulone
,
V.
,
Cozzolini
,
A.
,
Abeyratne
,
P.
,
Littera
,
D.
,
Thiagarajan
,
M.
,
Besch
,
M. C.
,
Gautam
,
M.
, 2010,
“Soot Modeling for Advanced Control of Diesel Engine Aftertreatment,”
ASME Paper ICEF 2010-35160.
14.
Bissett
,
E. J.
, and
Shadman
,
F.
, 1985,
“Thermal Regeneration of Diesel Particulate Monolithic Filters,”
A.I. ChE J.
,
39
, pp.
753
758
.
15.
Konstandopoulos
,
A. G.
,
Kostoglou
,
M.
,
Skaperdas
,
E.
,
Papaioannou
,
E.
,
Zarvalis
,
D.
, and
Kladopoulou
,
E.
, 2000, “Fundamental Studies of Diesel Particulate Filters: Transient Loading, Regeneration and Aging,” SAE Paper 2000-01-1016.
16.
Haralampous
,
O. A.
,
Koltsakis
,
G. C.
,
Samaras
,
Z. C.
,
Vogt
,
C. D.
,
Ohara
,
E.
,
Watanabe
,
Y.
, and
Mizutani
T.
, 2004, “Reaction and Diffusion Phenomena in Catalyzed Diesel Particulate Filters,” SAE paper 2004-01-0696.
17.
Kladopoulou
,
E. A.
,
Yang
,
S. L.
,
Johnson
,
J. H.
,
Parker
,
G. G.
, and
Konstandopoulos
,
A.G.
, 2003, “A Study Describing the Performance of Diesel Particulate Filters During Loading and Regeneration - A Lumped Parameter Model for Control Applications,” SAE Paper 2003-01-0842.
18.
Konstandopoulos
,
A. G.
, and
Johnson
,
J. H.
, 1989, “Wall-Flow Diesel Particulate Filters-Their Pressure Drop and Collection Efficiency,” SAE Trans. 98 sec. 3 (J. Engines), Paper No. 890405, p.
625
.
19.
Lee
,
K. W.
, and
Gieseke
J. A.
, 1978,
“Collection of Aerosol Particles by Packed Beds,”
Env. Sci. Tech.
,
13
(
4
), p.
1761
.
20.
Konstandopoulous
,
A. G.
, and
Kostoglou
,
M.
, 2000,
“Reciprocating Flow Regeneration of Soot Filters,”
Combust. Flame
,
121
, pp.
488
500
.
21.
Mecocci
,
F.
,
Mulone
,
V.
,
Rocco
,
V.
,
Perin
,
M.
, and
Tonetti
M.
, 2010, “A Comparison of Particle Number and Mass Collection Efficiency of a Close-Coupled DOC-DPF System Under Different Engine Operating Conditions,” ASME Fall Technical Conference ICEF 2010.
22.
Koltsakis
,
G. C.
,
Dardiotis
,
C. K.
,
Samaras
,
Z. C.
,
Maunula
,
T.
,
Kinnune
,
T.
, and
Lundorf
,
P.
, 2009, “Optimization Methodologies for DPF Substrate-Catalyst Combinations,” SAE paper 2009-01-0291.
You do not currently have access to this content.