Having a personal computer (PC) and related electronic equipment in the majority of U.S. homes today is accepted without question. In the same vein, having a personal turbine (PT) in the home could also be taken for granted in coming decades to assure a constant and reliable source of electrical power, which is paramount in the e-business era. As addressed in this paper, gas turbine technology has advanced to the point where a natural gas-fired PT, rated at about 5 kW could reliably provide the total energy needs of an average home. The Industrial Revolution of the 18th century, in which a centralized factory replaced cottage industries, was made possible by introduction of the steam engine. In the 21st century IT Revolution, the situation will have essentially gone the full circle, with a high percentage of service industry work being done in the home. For individuals using the internet for conducting business a reliable source of electrical power is mandatory. Alas, this can no longer be assured by the U.S. power grid which is quickly reaching its capacity, and increasing outages will become more commonplace. One solution to this could be the use of PTs in homes in both cities and remote areas. Also it would be ideally suited to applications in the developing countries, where it could provide the total energy needs of villages and small communities. In this introductory paper it is projected that when mass produced in very large quantities like automobile turbochargers, the PT unit cost would be competitive.

Issue Section:
Gas Turbines: Cycle Innovations
Keywords:
gas turbines, power systems, emission, electric generators, design for manufacture, performance evaluation
Topics:
Gas turbines, Generators, Microturbines, Turbines, Emissions, Design, Turbochargers, Manufacturing, Automobiles, Turbogenerators
1.
Craig, P., 1997, “The Capstone Turbogenerator as an Alternative Power Source,” SAE Paper 970292.
2.
Clark, A., and McShane, D., 1999, “Hybrid Electric Vehicles Utilizing Capstone Microturbine Technology,” SAE Paper 1999-01-2930.
3.
Gerendas, M., and Pfister, R., 2000, “Development of a Very Small Aero Engine,” ASME Paper 2000-GT-0536.
4.
Rodgers, C., 1986, “A Jet Fuel Starter and Expendable Turbojet,” ASME Paper 86-GT-001.
5.
Rodgers, C., 1997, “Advances in Small Turbopropulsion Engine Technology,” AIAA Paper 97-3289.
6.
Thompson, T., et al., 1994, “Conversion of T-100 MPSU Technology,” ASME Paper 94-GT-490.
7.
Woodhouse
,
G. D.
, 1994, “Auxiliary Power Unit Evolution,” Aerosp. Eng., May, pp.19–23.
8.
Nakajima, T., et al., 1995, “The Development of the Micro Gas Turbine Generator,” paper presented at Yokohama International Gas Turbine Conference.
9.
Sakakida, M., et al., 1999, “A Study of a Small Gas Turbine Engine for Mini—Cogeneration System,” Proceedings of the International Gas Turbine Congress, Kobe, Japan, Nov. 14–17, Gas Turbine Society of Japan, Tokyo, pp. 1060–1074.
10.
Rodgers, C., 1993, “Small (10–200 kW) Turbogenerator Design Considerations,” ASME IGTI-Vol. 8, pp. 535–542.
11.
Rodgers, C., 2000, “25-5 kW Microturbine Design Aspects,” ASME Paper 2000-GT-0626.
12.
Rodgers, C., 1997, “Turbochargers to Small Gas Turbines?” ASME Paper 97-GT-200.
13.
McDonald
,
C. F.
,
1996
, “
Heat Recovery Exchanger Technology for Very Small Gas Turbines
,”
Intl. J Turbo Jet Eng.
,
13
(
4
) , pp.
239
–
261
.
14.
McDonald, C. F., 1999, “Emergence of Recuperated Gas Turbines for Power Generation,” ASME Paper 99-GT-067.
15.
McDonald, C. F., 1975, “Recuperator Development Trends for Future High Temperature Gas Turbines,” ASME Paper 75-GT-050.
16.
Rochford, K., 2000, personal communication Aug. 18.
17.
Oswald, J. I., et al., 1999, “A New Durable Gas Turbine Recuperator,” ASME Paper 99-GT-369.
18.
McDonald, C. F., 2000, “Low Cost Recuperator Concept for Microturbine Applications,” ASME Paper 2000-GT-0167.
19.
McDonald
,
C. F.
,
2000
, “
Low Cost Compact Primary Surface Recuperator for Microturbines
,”
J. Appl. Therm. Eng.
,
29
, pp.
471
–
497
.
20.
Carlson, S., 2000, personal communication June 6.
21.
Rodgers, C., 1997, “Thermo—Economics of Small 50 kW Turbogenerator,” ASME Paper 97-GT-260.
22.
Gelsi, S., 2000, “Capstone Turbine Eyes PC-Like Role,” CBS Market Watch Publication, Aug. 13.
23.
Dunn
,
S.
,
2000
, “
Micropower: The Next Electrical Era
,”
Worldwatch Paper
,
151
, July, p.
22
22
.
24.
Myers, P. F., 1997, “Economics and Design Approaches for Small Commercial Turbogenerators,” ASME Paper 97-GT-364.
25.
Carno, J., et al., 1998, “Micro Gas Turbine for Combined Heat and Power inDistributed Generation,” ASME Paper 98-GT-309.
26.
Brezonick
,
M.
, 2000, “Cain Raising Its Sights in Cogeneration Markets,” Diesel Gas Turb Worldwide, Jan., pp. 10–12.
27.
Massardo, A. F., et al., 2000, “Microturbine/Fuel Cell Coupling for High Efficiency Power Generation,” ASME Paper 2000-GT-0175.
28.
Magistri, L., et al., 2001, “A Hybrid System Based on a Personal Turbine (5 kW) and a SOFC Stack: A Flexible and High Efficiency Energy Concept for the Distributed Power Market,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0092.
29.
Rodgers, C., and McDonald, C. F., 1997, “Automotive Turbogenerator Design Considerations and Technology Evolution,” SAE Paper 972673.
30.
Armstrong
,
L.
, 1999, “Ideas for the 21st Century…. I am Your Local Power Plant,” Bus. Week, 3Aug. 30, p 84.
Copyright © 2002
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.