Abstract

The collection and preservation of microtraces, such as fibers, using cellophane tape is generally accepted as being very practical and efficient. At the scene of a crime, for example, this means of sample collection is both easy and rapid, which explains in part its popularity. However, in addition to a very low specificity (high background), this technique suffers from one major disadvantage: the microtraces must undergo a long and tedious pretreatment before any detailed analysis is possible. This pretreatment involves the isolation and separation of the microtrace from the tape, followed by a solvent wash (usually with xylene) to remove all trace of the adhesive.

A recently commercialized product alleviates some of the problems associated with sample collection by this means: “Mask Plus II” (No. 5414, Scotch™, St-Paul, MN) is a new cellophane tape that is completely soluble in water. Microtrace collection can be performed with this tape by the conventional lifting procedure. In the laboratory, the microtraces may then be conveniently released from the tape by immersion in warm water (60°C) with continual agitation. After solubilization of the cellophane tape, the microtraces are isolated by membrane filtration then allowed to air dry.

The described technique has been thoroughly evaluated for fiber collection with comparison of the results with those obtained using conventional cellophane tape. Particular attention has been paid to operating conditions (temperature, humidity, conservation, etc.), collection efficiency, as well as possible alterations to the fibers themselves.

References

1.
Frei-Sulzer
,
M.
, “
Die Sicherung von Mikrospuren mit Klebeband
,”
Kriminalistik
, Vol.
19/20
,
10
1951
, pp.
190
-
194
.
2.
McKenna
,
F. J.
and
Sherwin
,
J. C.
, “
A Simple and Effective Method for Collecting Contact Evidence
,”
Journal of the Forensic Science Society
, Vol.
15
, No.
4
,
1975
, pp.
277
-
280
.
3.
Choudhry
,
M. Y.
, “
A Novel Technique for the Collection and Recovery of Foreign Fibers in Forensic Science Casework
,”
Journal of Forensic Sciences
 0022-1198, Vol.
33
, No.
1
,
1988
, pp.
249
-
253
.
4.
Flinn
,
L. L.
, “
Collection of Fiber Evidence Using a Roller Device and Adhesive Lifts
,”
Journal of Forensic Sciences
 0022-1198, Vol.
37
, No.
1
,
01
1992
, pp.
106
-
112
.
5.
Wickenheiser
,
R. A.
, “
Fibre Concentration by Membrane Vacuum Filtration in Preparation for Rapid Microscopic Comparison
,”
The Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal
, Vol.
25
, No.
3
,
1992
, pp.
177
-
181
.
6.
Martin
,
E.
, “
Les nouvelles bandes adhésives et la mise en sûreté des microtraces
,”
Revue Internationale de Police Criminelle
, No.
200
, Aug.–Sept. 1966, pp.
200
-
204
.
7.
Pounds
,
C. A.
, “
The Recovery of Fibres from the Surface of Clothing for Forensic Examinations
,”
Journal of the Forensic Science Society
, Vol.
15
, No.
2
,
1975
, pp.
127
-
132
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.