Abstract

A total of 189 volunteers were asked to simulate 21 isolated handwriting symbols consisting of single strokes, geometric figures, printed English alphabet letters, simple Chinese characters, and a plain signature, each of which contained one or two designated target features. The study shows that the simulators concentrate on the more eye-catching characteristics, neglecting the inconspicuous—and very often fundamental and therefore more useful—diagnostic features of handwriting. The experiment confirms the empirical information contained in authoritative texts of handwriting examination.

References

1.
Osborn
,
A. S.
,
Questioned Documents, Second Edition
,
Patterson Smith
,
New Jersey
,
1978
.
2.
Harrison
,
W. R.
,
Suspect Documents Their Scientific Examination, Second Impression with Supplement
,
Sweet & Maxwell
,
London
,
1966
.
3.
Hilton
,
O.
,
Scientific Examination of Questioned Documents, Revised Edition
,
Elsevier North Holland, Inc.
,
New York
,
1982
.
4.
Muehlberger
,
R. J.
, “
Identifying Simulations: Practical Considerations
,”
Journal of Forensic Sciences
 0022-1198, Vol.
35
, No.
2
,
03
1990
, pp.
368
-
374
.
5.
Herkt
,
A.
, “
Signature Disguise or Signature Forgery?
,”
Journal of the Forensic Science Society
, Vol.
26
, No.
4
,
1986
, pp.
257
-
266
.
6.
Puri
,
D. K. S.
, “
Tremors (Forged or Genuine)
,”
International Criminal Police Review
, No.
282
,
11
1974
, pp.
241
-
244
.
7.
Leung
,
S. C.
,
Tsui
,
C. K.
,
Cheung
,
W. L.
, and
Chung
,
M. W. L.
, “
A Comparative Approach to the Examination of Chinese Handwriting—The Chinese Character
,”
Journal of the Forensic Science Society
, Vol.
25
, No.
4
,
1985
, pp.
255
-
267
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.