The fundamental understanding of the dynamic interactions between multiphase flow in the reservoir and that in the wellbore remains surprisingly weak. The classical way of dealing with these interactions is via inflow performance relationships (IPRs), where the inflow from the reservoir is related to the pressure at the bottom of the well, which is a function of the multiphase flow behavior in the well. A steady-state IPRs are normally adopted, but their use may be erroneous when transient multiphase flow conditions occur. The transient multiphase flow in the wellbore causes problems in well test interpretation when the well is shut-in at the surface and the bottomhole pressure is measured. The pressure buildup (PBU) data recorded during a test can be dominated by transient wellbore effects (e.g., phase change, flow reversal, and re-entry of the denser phase into the producing zone), making it difficult to distinguish between true reservoir features and transient wellbore artifacts. This paper introduces a method to derive the transient IPRs at bottomhole conditions in order to link the wellbore to the reservoir during PBU. A commercial numerical simulator was used to build a simplified reservoir model (single well, radial coordinates, homogeneous rock properties) using published data from a gas condensate field in the North Sea. In order to exclude wellbore effects from the investigation of the transient inflow from the reservoir, the simulation of the wellbore was omitted from the model. Rather than the traditional flow rate at surface conditions, bottomhole pressure was imposed to constrain the simulation. This procedure allowed the flow rate at the sand face to be different from zero during the early times of the PBU, even if the surface flow rate is equal to zero. As a result, a transient IPR at bottomhole conditions was obtained for the given field case and for a specific set of time intervals, time steps, and bottomhole pressure. In order to validate the above simulation approach, a preliminary evaluation of the required experimental setup was carried out. The setup would allow the investigation of the dynamic interaction between the reservoir, the near-wellbore region, and the well, represented by a pressured vessel, a cylindrical porous medium, and a vertical pipe, respectively.

1.
Gringarten
,
A. C.
,
Al-Lamki
,
A.
,
Daungkaew
,
S.
,
Mott
,
R.
, and
Whittle
,
T. M.
, 2000, “
Well Test Analysis in Gas Condensate Reservoirs
,”
SPE Annual Conference and Exhibition
, Dallas, TX, Oct. 1–4, SPE Paper No. 62920.
2.
Bozorgzadeh
,
M.
, and
Gringarten
,
A. C.
, 2004, “
New Estimate for the Radius of a Condensate Bank From Well Test Data Using Dry Gas Pseudo-Pressure
,”
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
, Houston, TX, Sept. 26–29, SPE Paper No. 89904.
3.
Whitson
,
C. H.
,
Favang
,
Ø.
, and
Yang
,
T.
, 1999, “
Gas Condensate PVT: What’s Really Important and Why?
,”
IBC Conference on Optimization of Gas Condensate Fields
, London.
4.
Frederick
,
D. C.
, Jr.
, and
Graves
,
R. M.
, 1994, “
New Correlations to Predict Non-Darcy Flow Coefficient as Immobile and Mobile Water Saturation
,”
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
, New Orleans, LA, Sept. 25–28, SPE Paper No. 28451.
5.
Gewers
,
C.W.W.
, and
Nichols
,
L.R.
, 1969, “
Gas Turbulence Factor in a Microvugular Carbonate
,”
J. Can. Pet. Technol.
0021-9487,
8
, pp.
51
56
.
6.
Wong
,
S.W.
, 1970, “
Effect of Liquid Saturation on Turbulence Factors for Gas-Liquid Systems
,”
J. Can. Pet. Technol.
0021-9487,
9
, p.
274
.
7.
Evans
,
R. D.
,
Hudson
,
C. S.
, and
Greenlee
,
G. E.
, 1985, “
The Effect of Liquid Saturation on the Non-Darcy Flow Coefficient in Porous Media
,”
SPE Annual Technical Conference
, Las Vegas, NV, Sept. 22–25, SPE Paper No. 14206.
8.
Evans
,
E.V.
, and
Evans
,
R.D.
, 1988, “
Influence of an Immobile or Mobile Saturation on Non-Darcy Compressible Flow of Real Gases in Propped Fractures
,”
JPT
0149-2136,
40
, pp.
1343
1351
.
9.
Favang
,
Ø.
, and
Whitson
,
C. H.
, 1995, “
Modeling Gas Condensate Well Deliverability
,”
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
, Dallas, TX, Oct. 22–25, SPE Paper No. 30714.
10.
Al-Darmaki
,
S.
,
Falcone
,
G.
,
Hale
,
C. P.
, and
Hewitt
,
G. F.
, 2006, “
Experimental Investigation and Modeling of the Effects of Rising Gas Bubbles in a Closed Pipe
,”
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
, San Antonio, TX, Sept. 24–27, SPE Paper No. 103129.
11.
Ali
,
A. M.
,
Falcone
,
G.
,
Hewitt
,
G. F.
,
Bozorgzadeh
,
M.
, and
Gringarten
,
A. C.
, 2005, “
Experimental Investigation of Wellbore Phase Redistribution Effects on Pressure-Transient Data
,”
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
, Dallas, TX, Oct. 9–12, SPE Paper No. 96587.
12.
Alimonti
,
C.
,
Lausdei
,
D.
, and
Santoro
,
L. B.
, 2005, “
Experimental Analysis of the Stripping Process Driven by the Air Sparging Systems
,”
Proceedings of ConSoil 2005 Ninth Conference on Contaminated Soil
, Bordeaux, France.
13.
Falcone
,
G.
, 2006 “
Modeling of Flows in Vertical Pipes and its Application to Multiphase Flow Metering at High Gas Content and to the Production of Well Performance
,” Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College, London.
You do not currently have access to this content.