Expert systems are one of the few areas of artificial intelligence which have successfully made the transition from research and development to practical application. The key to fielding a successful expert system is finding the right problem to solve. AI costs, including all the development and testing, are so high that the problems must be very important to justify the effort. This paper develops a systematic way of trying to predict the future. It provides robust decision-making criteria, which can be used to predict the success or failure of proposed expert systems. The methods focus on eliminating obviously unsuitable problems and performing risk assessments and cost evaluations of the program. These assessments include evaluation of need, problem complexity, value, user experience, and the processing speed required. If an application proves feasible, the information generated during the decision phase can be then used to speed the development process.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 1993
Research Papers
Finding Cost-Effective Applications for Expert Systems
P. J. Hartman
P. J. Hartman
NAVSEA 05Q3, Naval Sea Systems Command, Washington, DC 20362-5160
Search for other works by this author on:
P. J. Hartman
NAVSEA 05Q3, Naval Sea Systems Command, Washington, DC 20362-5160
J. Energy Resour. Technol. Mar 1993, 115(1): 56-61 (6 pages)
Published Online: March 1, 1993
Article history
Received:
October 1, 1991
Revised:
August 26, 1992
Online:
April 16, 2008
Citation
Hartman, P. J. (March 1, 1993). "Finding Cost-Effective Applications for Expert Systems." ASME. J. Energy Resour. Technol. March 1993; 115(1): 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2905970
Download citation file:
10
Views
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Fuel Consumption Prediction in Dual-Fuel Low-Speed Marine Engines With Low-Pressure Gas Injection
J. Energy Resour. Technol (December 2024)
A Semi-Analytical Rate-Transient Analysis Model for Fractured Horizontal Well in Tight Reservoirs Under Multiphase Flow Conditions
J. Energy Resour. Technol (November 2024)
Experimental Investigation of New Combustion Chamber Geometry Modification on Engine Performance, Emission, and Cylinder Liner Microstructure for a Diesel Engine
J. Energy Resour. Technol (December 2024)
Downdraft Gasification for Biogas Production: The Role of Artificial Intelligence
J. Energy Resour. Technol (December 2024)
Related Articles
A Set of Estimation and Decision Preference Experiments for Exploring Risk Assessment Biases in Engineering Students
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (March,2023)
Fundamentals of Robotics: Linking Perception to Action (Series in Machine Perception and Artificial Intelligence)
Appl. Mech. Rev (September,2004)
Pacific Ocean Windspeeds Prediction by Gaidai Multivariate Risks Evaluation Method, Utilizing Self-Deconvolution
ASME Open J. Engineering (January,2024)
JCISE Editorial – August 2022
J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng (August,2022)
Related Chapters
Event Calculus and Probabilistic Knowledge Base of Conditional Events in Complex Systems Management
Intelligent Engineering Systems Through Artificial Neural Networks, Volume 17
Decision Making Methods Evaluating Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Analysis of Complex Techical Systems (PSAM-0011)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Expert Systems in Condition Monitoring
Tribology of Mechanical Systems: A Guide to Present and Future Technologies