Abstract
Closed-loop control of commercial building heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) for demand response requires measurements used as feedback to the controllers. Demand response effectiveness is usually measured as a power deviation from baseline, but the building automation system (BAS) does not usually collect power measurements, and whole-building electric meters typically measure power at intervals of 15 min, which may be too slow for some types of demand response. Demand response strategies are sometimes focused on components of building HVAC systems, e.g., the response of supply/return fans to temperature set-point changes, but these components are usually not submetered. Fan power can be estimated from physics-based models leveraging BAS data, e.g., airflow measurements; but our ability to effectively close the loop on these estimates is not clear. In this paper, we introduce a massive dataset that contains both submetered fan power data and BAS data for several building HVAC systems during typical operation and demand response events. Through a case study we show that models leveraging BAS data alone do not provide accurate estimates of fan power during event transients, making it unlikely that closed-loop control of commercial building HVAC components for demand response would be effective using BAS data alone. This demonstrates the value of submetering HVAC components. More broadly, our dataset will enable future research bridging the gap between building control and power systems research.