In this paper, a novel algorithm for indirect tire failure indication is described. The estimation method is based on measuring changes in the lateral dynamics behavior resulting from certain types of tire failure modes including excessive deflation or significant thread loss in a combination of tires. Given the fact that both failures will notably affect the lateral dynamics behavior, quantifying these changes constitutes the basis of the estimation method. In achieving this, multiple models and switching method are utilized based on lateral dynamics models of the vehicle that are parametrized to account for the uncertainty in tire pressure levels. The results are demonstrated using representative numerical simulations.

References

1.
U.S. Department of Transportation
,
2005
, “
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, FMVSS No.138: Tire Pressure Monitoring System
,” Final Regulatory Impact Analysis, Technical Report.
2.
European Union,
2010
, “
European Union UNECE Vehicle Regulations—1958 Agreement. Addendum No. 63, Regulation No. 64-Rev.1
,” E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.63/Rev.1.
3.
Gustafsson
,
F.
,
2009
, “
Automotive Safety Systems: Replacing Costly Sensors With Software Algorithms
,”
IEEE Signal Process. Mag.
,
26
(
4
), pp.
32
47
.
4.
Persson
,
N.
,
Gustafsson
,
F.
, and
Drevö
,
M.
,
2002
, “
Indirect Tire Pressure Monitoring Using Sensor Fusion
,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2002-01-1250.
5.
Suender
,
R.
,
Prokop
,
G.
, and
Roscher
,
T.
,
2015
, “
Comparative Analysis of Tire Evaluation Methods for an Indirect Tire Pressure Monitoring System (iTPMS)
,”
SAE Int. J. Passenger Cars Mech. Syst.
,
8
, pp.
110
118
.
6.
Thiriez
,
K. K.
, 2003, “
Evaluation of Indirect Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems Using Data From NCSA's Tire Pressure Special Study
,”
18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles
, Nagoya, Japan, pp.
1
8
.
7.
van Zanten
,
A. T.
,
2002
, “
Evolution of Electronic Control Systems for Improving the Vehicle Dynamic Behavior
,”
AVEC’02 International Symposium on Advanced Vehicle Control
, Hiroshima, Japan.
8.
U.S. Department of Transportation
,
2007
, “
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, FMVSS No.126: Electronic Stability Control Systems, Final Regulatory Impact Analysis
,” Technical Report.
9.
Kiencke
,
U.
, and
Nielsen
,
L.
,
2000
,
Automotive Control Systems for Engine, Driveline and Vehicle
,
Springer-Verlag & SAE International
,
Berlin
.
10.
Pacejka
,
H. B.
,
2005
,
Tire and Vehicle Dynamics
, 2nd ed.,
Butterworth-Heinemann
,
Oxford, UK
.
11.
Solmaz
,
S.
,
Akar
,
M.
,
Shorten
,
R.
, and
Kalkkuhl
,
J.
,
2008
, “
Realtime Multiple-Model Estimation of Center of Gravity Position in Automotive Vehicles
,”
Veh. Syst. Dyn. J.
,
46
(
9
), pp.
763
788
.
12.
Narendra
,
K. S.
, and
Balakrishnan
,
J.
,
1994
, “
Improving Transient Response of Adaptive Control Systems Using Multiple Models and Switching
,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
,
39
(
9
), pp.
1861
1866
.
You do not currently have access to this content.