Eddy current sensors provide an inexpensive means of detecting surface and embedded flaws in metallic structures due to fatigue, corrosion, and manufacturing defects. However, use of eddy current sensors for imaging flaws to determine their geometry is limited by sensitivity and mathematical uniqueness issues, as the magnetic flux distribution sensed at the boundary of a structure can be similar for dissimilar flaw geometries or flaw depths. This paper investigates the use of feedback control based on measured magnetic flux at a point on the boundary of the structure in order to address sensitivity and uniqueness issues for eddy current sensors and thus to enhance the ability to use these simple inexpensive sensors to determine flaw geometry. Using a parametrized two-dimensional flaw in which width and depth of the flaw are to be determined, scalar metrics are developed to relate the forward solution of the electromagnetic dynamics to the inverse problem of damage geometry reconstruction. Geometry is determined by interpolating metrics on a mesh and employing a systematic ranking process that is robust to weakly unique inverse problems. Finally, the concept of sensitivity enhancing feedback control (SEC) is applied to enrich the data set in order to improve damage geometry reconstruction. SEC feeds back measured magnetic flux at a single point along a scan line to affect the current density. Closed-loop compensation of eddy current dynamics is shown to improve uniqueness of scalar damage metrics to damage geometry parameters. Performance is demonstrated by simulation of geometry construction using finite-element models of two-dimensional flaws embedded in a material, both with and without feedback control and for noisy and noiseless simulated magnetic flux density measurement. For noiseless data, flaw depth and width are reconstructed within the resolution of the mesh (0.01 mm) using feedback control, while the relative accuracy of damage geometry identification for open-loop data is on the order of 0.1 mm in each dimension. Simulation of damage geometry identification with noisy data demonstrates lower relative error using closed-loop data, as measured by the mean and standard deviation in identified depth and width.

1.
Solbeck
,
J. A.
, and
Ray
,
L. R.
, 2006, “
Damage Identification Using Sensitivity-Enhancing Control and Identified Models
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
0739-3717,
128
, pp.
210
220
.
2.
Solbeck
,
J.
,
Koh
,
B.
, and
Ray
,
L.
, 2002, “
A Comparison of Damage Detection Methodologies Using Analytic Models and Identified Models
,”
43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference
, Apr., Paper No. AIAA 2002-1546, pp.
2717
2727
.
3.
Koh
,
B. H.
, and
Ray
,
L. R.
, 2003, “
Localization of Damage in Smart Structures Through Sensitivity Enhancing Feedback Control
,”
Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
0888-3270,
17
(
4
), pp.
837
855
.
4.
Ray
,
L. R.
, and
Tian
,
L.
, 1999, “
Damage Detection in Smart Structures Using Sensitivity Enhancing Feedback Control
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
227
(
5
), pp.
987
1002
.
5.
Ray
,
L. R.
,
Koh
,
B. H.
, and
Tian
,
L.
, 2000, “
Autonomous Damage Detection and Vibration Control in Smart Plates: Towards Multifunctional Smart Structures
,”
J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct.
1045-389X,
11
(
9
), pp.
725
739
.
6.
Koh
,
B. H.
, and
Ray
,
L. R.
, 2004, “
Feedback Controller Design for Sensitivity-Based Damage Localization
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
273
(
1–2
), pp.
317
335
.
7.
Joyner
,
M. L.
, 2001, “
An Application of a Reduced Order Computational Methodology for Eddy Current-Based Nondestructive Evaluation Techniques
,” Ph.D. thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
8.
Bowler
,
J. R.
,
Norton
,
S. J.
, and
Harrison
,
D. J.
, 1994, “
Eddy-Current Interaction With an Ideal Crack. II. The Inverse Problem
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
0021-8979,
75
(
12
), pp.
8138
8144
.
9.
Banks
,
H. T.
,
Joyner
,
M. L.
,
Wincheski
,
B.
, and
Winfree
,
W. P.
, 2001, “
Real Time Computational Algorithms for Eddy Current Based Damage Detection
,” Center for Research in Scientific Computation, North Carolina State University, Report No. CRSC TR01-16.
10.
Norton
,
S. J.
, and
John
,
R.
, 1993, “
Bowler, Theory of Eddy Current Inversion
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
0021-8979,
73
(
2
), pp.
501
512
.
11.
Bowler
,
J. R.
, 1994, “
Eddy-Current Interaction With an Ideal Crack. I. The Forward Problem
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
0021-8979,
75
(
12
), pp.
8128
8137
.
12.
Burke
,
S. K.
, 1994, “
Eddy-Current Inversion in the Thin-Skin Limit: Determination of Depth and Opening for a Long Crack
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
0021-8979,
76
(
5
), pp.
3072
3080
.
13.
Dobson
,
D. C.
, and
Santosa
,
F.
, 1998, “
Nondestructive Evaluation of Plates Using Eddy Current Methods
,”
Int. J. Eng. Sci.
,
36
(
4
), pp.
395
409
. 0020-7225
14.
Li
,
Y.
,
Udpa
,
L.
, and
Udpa
,
S.
, 2004, “
Three-Dimensional Defect Reconstruction From Eddy-Current NDE Signals Using a Genetic Local Search Algorithm
,”
IEEE Trans. Magn.
0018-9464,
40
(
2
), pp.
410
417
.
15.
Glorieux
,
C.
,
Moulder
,
J.
,
Basar
,
J.
, and
Thoen
,
J.
, 1999, “
The Determination of Electrical Conductivity Profiles Using Neural network Inversion of Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Data
,”
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
0022-3727,
32
, pp.
616
622
.
16.
Cheng
,
W.
,
Miya
,
K.
, and
Chen
,
Z.
, 1999, “
Reconstruction of Cracks With Multiple Eddy Current Coils Using a Database Approach
,”
J. Nondestruct. Eval.
0195-9298,
18
(
4
), pp.
149
160
.
17.
Sabbagh
,
H. A.
, and
Sabbagh
,
L. D.
, 1986, “
An Eddy-Current Model for Three-Dimensional Inversion
,”
IEEE Trans. Magn.
0018-9464,
22
(
4
), pp.
282
291
.
18.
Kapitonov
,
B. V.
, 1994, “
Stabilization and Exact Boundary Controllability for Maxwell’s Equations
,”
SIAM J. Control Optim.
0363-0129,
32
(
2
), pp.
408
420
.
19.
Nicaise
,
S.
, 2000, “
Exact Boundary Controllability of Maxwell’s Equations in Heterogeneous Media and an Application to an Inverse Source Problem
,”
SIAM J. Control Optim.
0363-0129,
38
(
4
), pp.
1145
1170
.
20.
Yamamoto
,
M.
, 1995, “
Stability, Reconstruction and Regularization for an Inverse Source Hyperbolic Problem by a Control Method
,”
Inverse Probl.
0266-5611,
11
, pp.
481
496
.
21.
Schwarz
,
S. E.
, 1990,
Electromagnetics for Engineers
,
Holt, Rinehart, and Winston
,
New York
.
22.
Fisher
,
R.
, 2007, “
Sensitivity Enhancing Control for Eddy Current Nondestructive Evaluation
,” MS thesis, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.
23.
Sandwell
,
D.
, 1987, “
Biharmonic Spline Interpolation of GEOS-3 and SEASAT Altimeter Data
,”
Geophys. Res. Lett.
,
14
(
2
), pp.
139
142
. 0094-8276
24.
Ray
,
L.
, and
Fisher
,
R.
, 2006, “
Smart Electromagnetic Sensors for Damage Identification
,”
ASME International Mechanical Engineering Conference and Exhibition
, Chicago, IL, Nov.
25.
Ray
,
L. R.
, and
Koh
,
B. H.
, 2003, “
Enhancing Uniqueness Properties in Damage Identification Using Sensitivity Enhancing Control
,”
Mater. Eval.
,
61
(
10
), pp.
1134
1142
. 0025-5327
You do not currently have access to this content.