This paper presents a robust, adaptive, nonlinear controller for a class of magnetic-levitation systems, which includes active-magnetic bearings. The controller is analytically and experimentally shown to be superior to a classical linear control system in stability, control effort, step-response performance, robustness to parameter variations, and force-disturbance rejection performance. Using an adaptive backstepping approach, a Lyapunov function is generated along with an adaptive control law such that the nonlinear, closed-loop, continuous system is shown to guarantee stability of the equilibrium and convergence of the parameter estimates to constant values. The control system error coordinates are proven to be bounded in the presence of a bounded force disturbance input. The novelty of this controller is that it is digitally implemented using Euler integrators with anti-windup limits, it is single-input-single-output requiring only a measurement of the position of the levitating object, and it is designed to adaptively estimate not only the uncertain model parameters, but also the constant forces applied to the levitating object in order to ensure robustness to force disturbances. The experimental study was conducted on a single-axis magnetic-levitation device. The controller is shown to be applicable to active-magnetic bearings, under specific conditions, as well as any magnetic-levitation system that can be represented in output-feedback form.

1.
Charara
A.
,
De Miras
J.
, and
Caron
B.
,
1996
, “
Nonlinear Control of a Magnetic Levitation System Without Premagnetization
,”
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology
, Vol.
4
, No.
5
, Sept., pp.
513
523
.
2.
Cho, D., Kato, Y., and Spilman, D., 1993, “Sliding Mode and Classical Control of Magnetic Levitation Systems,” IEEE Control Systems, Feb., pp. 42–48.
3.
De Queiroz
M. S.
, and
Dawson
D. M.
,
1996
, “
Nonlinear Control of Active Magnetic Bearings: A Backstepping Approach
,”
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology
, Vol.
4
, No.
5
, Sept., pp.
545
552
.
4.
Fabien
B. C.
,
1996
, “
Observer-Based Feedback Linearizing Control of an Electromagnetic Suspension
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL
, Sept., Vol.
118
, pp.
615
619
.
5.
Green, S. A., and Craig, K. C., 1997, “Adaptive, Backstepping Control of a Magnetically Levitated System,” Proceedings of the ASME IMECE Dynamic Systems and Control, Nov.
6.
Krstic, M., Kanellakopoulos, I., and Kokotovic, P., 1995, Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design, Wiley, New York.
7.
Marino
R.
, and
Tomei
P.
,
1993
, “
Global Adaptive Output-Feedback Control of Nonlinear Systems, Part I: Linear Parameterization, Part II: Nonlinear Parameterization
,”
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
, Vol.
38
, No.
1
, Jan., pp.
17
48
.
8.
Rundell
A. E.
,
Drakunov
S. V.
, and
DeCarlo
R. A.
,
1996
, “
A Sliding Mode Observer and Controller for Stabilization of Rotational Motion of a Vertical Shaft Magnetic Bearing
,”
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology
, Vol.
4
, No.
5
, Sept., pp.
598
608
.
9.
Slotine, J.-J. E., and Li, W., 1991, Applied Nonlinear Control, Prentice Hall.
10.
Smith
R. D.
, and
Weldon
W. F.
,
1995
, “
Nonlinear Control of a Rigid Rotor Magnetic Bearing System: Modeling and Simulation with Full State Feedback
,”
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
, Vol.
31
, No.
2
, Mar., pp.
973
980
.
11.
Woodson, H. H., and Melcher, J. R., 1968, Electromechanical Dynamics; Part I: Discrete Systems, Wiley, New York.
12.
Youcef-Toumi
K.
,
1996
, “
Modeling, Design and Control Integration: A Necessary Step in Mechatronics
,”
IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics
, Vol.
1
, No.
1
, Mar., pp.
29
38
.
13.
Youcef-Toumi
K.
, and
Reddy
S.
,
1992
, “
Dynamic Analysis and Control of High Speed and High Precision Active Magnetic Bearings
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL
, Vol.
114
, Dec, pp.
623
633
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.