Research Papers

Modeling Hypervelocity-Impact-Induced Shock Waves for Characterizing Orbital Debris-Produced Damage

[+] Author and Article Information
Menglong Liu

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University,
Kowloon, Hong Kong

Zhongqing Su

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University,
Kowloon, Hong Kong
e-mail: zhongqing.su@polyu.edu.hk

Qingming Zhang, Renrong Long

State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology,
Beijing Institute of Technology,
Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Applied Mechanics Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS. Manuscript received December 8, 2015; final manuscript received May 23, 2016; published online June 10, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Weinong Chen.

J. Appl. Mech 83(8), 081010 (Jun 10, 2016) (11 pages) Paper No: JAM-15-1659; doi: 10.1115/1.4033679 History: Received December 08, 2015; Revised May 23, 2016

Hypervelocity impact (HVI) is a scenario involving an impacting velocity in excess of 1 km/s. Ubiquitous in outer space, paradigms of HVI are typified by the collision between orbital debris and spacecraft. HVI features transient, localized, and extreme material deformation under which the induced acoustic emission (AE) signals present unique yet complex features. A dedicated modeling and numerical simulation approach, based on the three-dimensional smooth-particle hydrodynamics (SPH), was developed to gain an insight into characteristics of HVI-induced AE propagation. With the approach, both normal and oblique HVI scenarios were interrogated, and material failure in both cases was predicted. The coincidence in results between simulation and HVI experiment, as observed at a qualitative degree, has demonstrated the effectiveness of the modeling. Signal analysis shows that the shock wave converts to Lamb wave quickly as propagation from HVI spot, with the zeroth-order symmetric wave mode (S0) (i.e., the first-arrival wave) dominating wave signal energy. S0 is observed dispersive in a wide frequency range with majority of it below 1 MHz. In comparison, the antisymmetric wave mode distributes in a range below 200 kHz with a peak value at 30 kHz. S0 was employed to pinpoint the location of HVI, using an enhanced delay-and-sum-based diagnostic imaging algorithm, which was validated by locating orbital debris-induced orifice in space structures, showing precise identification results.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Mihaly, J. M. , Tandy, J. D. , Rosakis, A. J. , Adams, M. A. , and Pullin, D. , 2014, “ Pressure-Dependent, Infrared-Emitting Phenomenon in Hypervelocity Impact,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 82(1), p. 011004. [CrossRef]
Li, Y. Q. , Li, X. G. , and Gao, X. L. , 2015, “ Modeling of Advanced Combat Helmet Under Ballistic Impact,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 82(11), p. 111004. [CrossRef]
Murr, L. E. , Quinones, S. A. , Ferreyra, T. E. , Ayala, A. , Valerio, O. L. , Hörz, F. , and Bernhard, R. P. , 1998, “ The Low-Velocity-to-Hypervelocity Penetration Transition for Impact Craters in Metal Targets,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 256(1–2), pp. 166–182. [CrossRef]
Ramjaun, D. , Kato, I. , Takayama, K. , and Jagadeesh, G. , 2003, “ Hypervelocity Impacts on Thin Metallic and Composite Space Debris Bumper Shields,” AIAA J., 41(8), pp. 1564–1572. [CrossRef]
Razzaqi, S. A. , and Smart, M. K. , 2011, “ Hypervelocity Experiments on Oxygen Enrichment in a Hydrogen-Fueled Scramjet,” AIAA J., 49(7), pp. 1488–1497. [CrossRef]
Murr, L. E. , Quinones, S. A. , Ferreyra, T. E. , Ayala, A. , Valerio, O. L. , Hörz, F. , and Bernhard, R. P. , 1998, “ The Low-Velocity-to-Hypervelocity Penetration Transition for Impact Craters in Metal Targets,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 256(1–2), pp. 166–182. [CrossRef]
IADC, 2013, “ Sensor Systems to Detect Impacts on Spacecraft,” Version 2.1.
Wright, D. , 2007, “ Space Debris,” Physics Today, 60(10), pp. 35–40.
Christiansen, E. L. , 1993, “ Design and Performance Equations for Advanced Meteoroid and Debris Shields,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 14(1), pp. 145–156. [CrossRef]
Cour-Palais, B. G. , and Crews, J. L. , 1990, “ A Multi-Shock Concept for Spacecraft Shielding,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 10(1), pp. 135–146. [CrossRef]
Drolshagen, G. , 2008, “ Impact Effects From Small Size Meteoroids and Space Debris,” Adv. Space Res., 41(7), pp. 1123–1131. [CrossRef]
Kundu, T. , Das, S. , Martin, S. A. , and Jata, K. V. , 2008, “ Locating Point of Impact in Anisotropic Fiber Reinforced Composite Plates,” Ultrasonics, 48(3), pp. 193–201. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Coverley, P. T. , and Staszewski, W. J. , 2003, “ Impact Damage Location in Composite Structures Using Optimized Sensor Triangulation Procedure,” Smart Mater. Struct., 12(5), pp. 795–803. [CrossRef]
He, T. , Pan, Q. , Liu, Y. G. , Liu, X. D. , and Hu, D. Y. , 2012, “ Near-Field Beamforming Analysis for Acoustic Emission Source Localization,” Ultrasonics, 52(5), pp. 587–592. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Giurgiutiu, V. , and Bao, J. , 2004, “ Embedded-Ultrasonics Structural Radar for In Situ Structural Health Monitoring of Thin-Wall Structures,” Struct. Health Monit., 3(2), pp. 121–140. [CrossRef]
Raghavan, A. , and Cesnik, C. E. , 2007, “ Review of Guided-Wave Structural Health Monitoring,” Shock Vib. Dig., 39(2), pp. 91–116. [CrossRef]
Prosser, W. H. , Gorman, M. R. , and Humes, D. H. , 1999, “ Acoustic Emission Signals in Thin Plates Produced by Impact Damage,” J. Acoust. Emiss., 17, pp. 29–36.
Perkins, S. , 2010, “ Hypervelocity Impact Detection: An Investigation Into Piezoelectric Response of PVDF Films,” Master's thesis, School of Physical Sciences, University of Kent, UK.
Schäfer, F. , and Janovsky, R. , 2007, “ Impact Sensor Network for Detection of Hypervelocity Impacts on Spacecraft,” Acta Astronaut., 61(10), pp. 901–911. [CrossRef]
Benson, D. J. , 1992, “ Computational Methods in Lagrangian and Eulerian Hydrocodes,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 99(2), pp. 235–394. [CrossRef]
Ganzenmüller, G. C. , Hiermaier, S. , and May, M. , 2015, “ On the Similarity of Meshless Discretizations of Peridynamics and Smooth-Particle Hydrodynamics,” Comput. Struct., 150(0), pp. 71–78. [CrossRef]
Cherniaev, A. , and Telichev, I. , 2015, “ Meso-Scale Modeling of Hypervelocity Impact Damage in Composite Laminates,” Composites, Part B, 74(0), pp. 95–103. [CrossRef]
Mahmadi, K. , and Aquelet, N. , 2014, “ Euler–Lagrange Simulation of High Pressure Shock Waves,” Wave Motion, 54, pp. 28–42. [CrossRef]
Gingold, R. A. , and Monaghan, J. J. , 1977, “ Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics-Theory and Application to Non-Spherical Stars,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 181(3), pp. 375–389. [CrossRef]
Ryan, S. , Schäfer, F. , Guyot, M. , Hiermaier, S. , and Lambert, M. , 2008, “ Characterizing the Transient Response of CFRP/Al HC Spacecraft Structures Induced by Space Debris Impact at Hypervelocity,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 35(12), pp. 1756–1763. [CrossRef]
Clegg, R. , White, D. , Riedel, W. , and Harwick, W. , 2006, “ Hypervelocity Impact Damage Prediction in Composites: Part I—Material Model and Characterisation,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 33(1), pp. 190–200. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Q. M. , Long, R. R. , Huang, F. L. , Chen, L. , and Fu, Y. S. , 2008, “ A Model for Debris Clouds Produced by Impact of Hypervelocity Projectiles on Multiplate Structures,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 93(21), p. 211905. [CrossRef]
Liu, M. B. , and Liu, G. R. , 2010, “ Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH): An Overview and Recent Developments,” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 17(1), pp. 25–76. [CrossRef]
Anderson, J. D. , and Wendt, J. , 1995, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
Birdsall, C. K. , and Langdon, A. B. , 2004, Plasma Physics Via Computer Simulation, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Libersky, L. D. , Petschek, A. G. , Carney, T. C. , Hipp, J. R. , and Allahdadi, F. A. , 1993, “ High Strain Lagrangian Hydrodynamics: A Three-Dimensional SPH Code for Dynamic Material Response,” J. Comput. Phys., 109(1), pp. 67–75. [CrossRef]
Ahrens, T. , 1993, “ Equation of State,” High-Pressure Shock Compression of Solids, Springer, New York, pp. 75–113.
Steinberg, D. , Cochran, S. , and Guinan, M. , 2008, “ A Constitutive Model for Metals Applicable at High-Strain Rate,” J. Appl. Phys., 51(3), pp. 1498–1504. [CrossRef]
Liu, M. , Su, Z. , and Yuan, S. , 2014, “ On Propagation Characteristics of Shock Waves Generated Under Hypervelocity Impact,” 2nd International Conference of Structural Health Monitoring and Integrity Management, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 445–450.
Sohn, H. , and Lee, S. J. , 2010, “ Lamb Wave Tuning Curve Calibration for Surface-Bonded Piezoelectric Transducers,” Smart Mater. Struct., 19(1), p. 015007. [CrossRef]
Croxford, A. J. , Moll, J. , Wilcox, P. D. , and Michaels, J. E. , 2010, “ Efficient Temperature Compensation Strategies for Guided Wave Structural Health Monitoring,” Ultrasonics, 50(4), pp. 517–528. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Michaels, J. E. , and Michaels, T. E. , 2007, “ Guided Wave Signal Processing and Image Fusion for In Situ Damage Localization in Plates,” Wave Motion, 44(6), pp. 482–492. [CrossRef]
Li, F. , Su, Z. , Ye, L. , and Meng, G. , 2006, “ A Correlation Filtering-Based Matching Pursuit (CF-MP) for Damage Identification Using Lamb Waves,” Smart Mater. Struct., 15(6), pp. 1585–1594. [CrossRef]
Lu, Y. , Ye, L. , Su, Z. , Zhang, L. , and Li, C. , 2008, “ Artificial Neural Network (ANN)-Based Crack Identification in Aluminum Plates With Lamb Wave Signals,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 20(1), pp. 39–49. [CrossRef]
Wang, C. H. , Rose, J. T. , and Chang, F.-K. , 2004, “ A Synthetic Time-Reversal Imaging Method for Structural Health Monitoring,” Smart Mater. Struct., 13(2), pp. 415–423. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Sketch of normal and oblique HVI scenarios; and (b) hybrid model showing HVI vicinity (using SPH) and rest of target structure (using FE)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Comparison of simulation and experiment results in normal HVI (frame interval: 2 μs) [34]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

In-plane strain in normal and oblique HVI acquired at gauge points with a wave propagation distance of 30 mm from HVI spot at different wave propagation directions: (a) normal HVI and (b) oblique HVI

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Progressive change in material properties in oblique HVI at typical instants: 0.4 × 10−6 s, 0.8 × 10−6 s, 1.2 × 10−6 s, 2.0 × 10−6 s, and 2.8 × 10−6 s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparison of simulation and experiment results in oblique HVI (frame interval: 2 μs)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Progressive change in material properties in normal HVI at typical instants: 0.4 × 10−6 s, 0.8 × 10−6 s, 1.2 × 10−6 s, 2.0 × 10−6 s, and 2.8 × 10−6 s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Wavelet spectrographs of in-plane strain in Fig. 4: (a) symmetric mode and (b) antisymmetric mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Frequency spectra of in-plane symmetric and antisymmetric strains in Fig. 4

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

In-plane strain acquired at gauge point (0, 42, 42) in normal HVI: (a) original signal; (b) isolated symmetric and antisymmetric mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Relationship between shock wave velocity and compression ratio of target structure obtained using hybrid modeling and (b) shock wave velocity versus shock wave propagation distance

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Ultimate resulting image with four sensors (a) in normal HVI without noise screening process, (b) in normal HVI with noise screening process, and (c) in oblique HVI with noise screening process



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In