Research Papers

Failure of Carbon Fibers at a Crease in a Fiber-Reinforced Silicone Sheet

[+] Author and Article Information
Francisco López Jiménez

Postdoctoral Researcher
Laboratoire de Mécanique des Solides
École Polytechnique
91128 Palaiseau, France
e-mail: lopez@lms.polytechnique.fr

Sergio Pellegrino

Joyce and Kent Kresa Professor of Aeronautics
and Professor of Civil Engineering
California Institute of Technology
1200 E. California Blvd
MC 301-46, Pasadena, CA91125
e-mail: sergiop@caltech.edu

Contributed by Applied Mechanics of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS. Manuscript received November 5, 2011; final manuscript received April 9, 2012; accepted manuscript posted July 6, 2012; published online November 19, 2012. Editor: Robert M. McMeeking.

J. Appl. Mech 80(1), 011020 (Nov 19, 2012) (8 pages) Paper No: JAM-11-1417; doi: 10.1115/1.4007082 History: Received November 05, 2011; Revised April 09, 2012; Accepted July 06, 2012

Thin sheets of unidirectional carbon fibers embedded in a silicone matrix can be folded to very high curvatures, as elastic microbuckles with a half-wavelength on the order of 1 mm decrease the maximum strain in the fibers near the compression surface. This paper shows that probabilistic failure models derived from tension tests on individual fibers can be used to predict accurately the value of the outer surface curvature of the sheet, at which a small percentage of fibers break when a crease is formed in the sheet. The most accurate results are obtained by using a strain-based Weibull distribution of the failure probability in tension.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Francis, W., Lake, M. S., Mallick, K., Freebury, G. E., and Maji, A., 2003, “Development and Testing of a Hinge/Actuator Incorporating Elastic Memory Composites,” 44th AIAA Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Norfolk, VA, April 7–10, Paper No. AIAA 2003-1496.
Datashvili, L., Baier, H., Wehrle, E., Kuhn, T., and Hoffmann, J., 2010, “Large Shell-Membrane Space Reflectors,” 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Orlando, FL, April 12–15, Paper No. AIAA 2010-2504.
Murphey, T. W., Meink, T., and Mikulas, M. M., 2001, “Some Micromechanics Considerations of the Folding of Rigidizable Composite Materials,” 42nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Seattle, WA, April 16–19, Paper No. AIAA-2001-1418.
López Jiménez, F., and Pellegrino, S., 2012, “Folding of Fiber Composites With a Hyperelastic Matrix,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 49, pp. 395–407. [CrossRef]
Reynolds, W. N., and Sharp, J. V., 1974, “Crystal Shear Limit to Carbon Fibre Strength,” Carbon, 12, pp. 103–110. [CrossRef]
Bennett, S. C., Johnson, D. J., and Johnson, W., 1983, “Strength-Structure Relationships in PAN-Based Carbon Fibres,” J. Mater. Sci., 18, pp. 3337–3347. [CrossRef]
Donnet, J. B., Wang, T. K., Peng, J. C. M., and Rebouillat, S., 1998, Carbon Fibers, 3rd ed., Marcel Dekker, New York.
Bader, M. G., Pickering, K. L., Buxton, A., Rezaifard, A., and Smith, P. A., 1993, “Failure Micromechanisms in Continuous Carbon-Fibre/Epoxy-Resin Composites,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 48, pp. 135–142. [CrossRef]
Naito, K., Tanaka, Y., Yang, J.-M., and Kagawa, Y., 2008, “Tensile Properties of Ultrahigh Strength PAN-Based, Ultrahigh Modulus Pitch-Based and High Ductility Pitch-Based Carbon Fibers,” Carbon, 46, pp. 189–195. [CrossRef]
Sinclair, D., 1950, “A Bending Method for Measurement of the Tensile Strength and Young's Modulus of Glass Fibers,” J. Appl. Phys., 21, pp. 380–386. [CrossRef]
Oya, N., and Johnson, D. J., 1999, “Direct Measurement of Longitudinal Compressive Strength in Carbon Fibres,” Carbon, 37, pp. 1539–1544. [CrossRef]
Williams, W. S., Steffens, D. A., and Bacon, R., 1970, “Bending Behavior and Tensile Strength of Carbon Fibers,” J. Appl. Phys., 41, pp. 4893–4901. [CrossRef]
Jones, W. R., and Johnson, J. W., 1971, “Intrinsic Strength and Non-Hookean Behaviour of Carbon Fibres,” Carbon, 9, pp. 645–655. [CrossRef]
Curtis, G. J., Milne, J. M., and Reynolds, W. N., 1968, “Non-Hookean Behaviour of Strong Carbon Fibres,” Nature, 220, pp. 1024–1025. [CrossRef]
Da Silva, J. L. G., and Johnson, D. J., 1984, “Flexural Studies of Carbon Fibers,” J. Mater. Sci., 19, pp. 3201–3210. [CrossRef]
Hawthorne, H. M., 1993, “On Non-Hookean Behaviour of Carbon Fibres in Bending,” J. Mater. Sci., 28, pp. 2351–2535. [CrossRef]
Furuyama, M., Higuchi, M., Kubomura, K., Sunago, H., Jiang, H., and Kumar, S., 1993, “Compressive Properties of Single-Filamente Carbon Fibres,” J. Mater. Sci., 28, pp. 1611–1616. [CrossRef]
Oya, N., and Johnson, D. J., 2001, “Longitudinal Compressive Behaviour and Microstructure of PAN-Based Carbon Fibres,” Carbon, 39, pp. 635–645. [CrossRef]
Loidl, D., Paris, O., Bughammer, M., Riekel, C., and Peterlik, H., 2005, “Direct Observation of Nanocrystallite Buckling in Carbon Fibers Under Bending Load,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, p. 225501. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fukuda, H., Yakushijo, M., and Wada, A., 1999, “A Loop Test to Measure the Strength of Monofilaments Used for Advanced Composites,” Adv. Compos. Mater., 8, pp. 281–291. [CrossRef]
Naito, K., Tanaka, Y., Yang, J.-M., and Kagawa, Y., 2009, “Flexural Properties of PAN- and Pitch-Based Carbon Fibers, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 92, pp. 186–192. [CrossRef]
Francis, W. H., Lake, M. S., and Steven Mayes, J., 2006, “A Review of Classical Fiber Microbuckling Analytical Solutions for Use With Elastic Memory Composites,” 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Newport, RI, May 1–4, Paper No. AIAA-2006-1764.
Francis, W. H., Lake, M. S., Schultz, M. R., Campbell, D., Dunn, M., and Qi, H. J., 2007, “Elastic Memory Composite Microbuckling Mechanics: Closed-Form Model With Empirical Correlation,” 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Honolulu, HI, April 23–26, Paper No. AIAA-2007-2164.
Melanitis, N., Tetlow, P. L., Galiotis, C., and Smith, S. B., 1994, “Compressional Behaviour of Carbon Fibres. Part II: Modulus Softening,” J. Mater. Sci., 29, pp. 786–799. [CrossRef]
Daniel, I. M., and Ishai, O., 2006, Engineering Mechanics of Composite Materials, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, New York.
Trustum, K., and Jayatilaka, A. de S., 1979, “On Estimating the Weibull Modulus for a Brittle Material,” J. Mater. Sci.14, pp. 1080–1084. [CrossRef]
Love, A. E. H., 1944, A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity, 4th ed., Dover, New York.
Sanford, G., Biskner, A., and Murphey, T., 2010, “Large Strain Behavior of Thin Unidirectional Composite Flexures,” 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Orlando, FL, April 12–15, Paper No. AIAA 2010-2698.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Position of neutral axis in the fiber cross section for Et>Ec

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Weibull fit to probability of tensile failure for AS4 fibers versus (a) applied stress and (b) strain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Example of image used to measure rf

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Weibull fit of probability of failure in bending versus applied curvature for AS4 fibers; κ0=12.349 mm-1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Curvature κ and value of I1 for different values of m as a function of the arc length s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Failure probability versus maximum curvature for loop test; the two sets of predictions are based on the stress- and strain-based Weibull moduli for tensile failure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Fiber microbuckling on compression side of 0.54-mm-thick sheet

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Examples of curvature measurement: (a) κ=0.83 mm-1; (b) κ=1.25 mm-1 showing also edge waviness

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Measurement of broken fibers after creasing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Kinematics of bending deformation for a segment of composite sheet of initial length λ0, subject to a curvature κ. The neutral surface is assumed to coincide with the tension surface.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Probability of failure for fibers on compression side of 0.54-mm-thick sheet with a fold of π radians with curvature κ

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Values of κt and ɛf for creases with a single buckle and a failure probability of 1%



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In