Research Articles

Predicted Thermal Stress in a Multileg Thermoelectric Module (TEM) Design

[+] Author and Article Information
E. Suhir

Department of Electrical Engineering,
University of California,
Santa Cruz, CA 95064
e-mail: suhire@aol.com

A. Shakouri

Department of Electrical Engineering,
University of California,
Santa Cruz, CA 95064;
Birck Nanotechnology Center,
Purdue University,
West Lafayette, IN 47907-2057

1Also at: Physical Sciences and Engineering Research Division, Bell Labs, Murray Hill, NJ (ret); Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD; Dept. of Electronics Materials, Technical University, Vienna, Austria; and ERS Co, Los Altos, CA 94025; 727 Alvina Ct., Los Altos CA 94024.

Manuscript received February 20, 2012; final manuscript received August 20, 2012; accepted manuscript posted August 29, 2012; published online January 22, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Martin Ostoja-Starzewski.

J. Appl. Mech 80(2), 021012 (Jan 22, 2013) (11 pages) Paper No: JAM-12-1078; doi: 10.1115/1.4007524 History: Received February 20, 2012; Revised August 20, 2012; Accepted August 29, 2012

A physically meaningful analytical (mathematical) model is developed for the prediction of the interfacial shearing thermal stress in an assembly comprised of two identical components, which are subjected to different temperatures. The bonding system is comprised of a plurality of identical columnlike supports located at equal distances (spaces) from each other. The model is developed in application to a thermoelectric module (TEM) design where bonding is provided by multiple thermoelectric material supports (legs). We show that thinner (dimension in the horizontal direction) and longer (dimension in the vertical direction) TEM legs could result in a significant stress relief, and that such a relief could be achieved even if shorter legs are employed, as long as they are thin and the spacing between them is significant. It is imperative, of course, that if thin legs are employed for lower stresses, there is still enough interfacial “real estate,” so that the adhesive strength of the assembly is not compromised. On the other hand, owing to a lower stress level in an assembly with thin legs and large spacing, assurance of its interfacial strength is less of a challenge than for a conventional assembly with stiff, thick, and closely positioned legs. We show also that the thermal stresses not only in conventional TEM designs (using Be2Te3 as the thermoelectric material, and Sn-Sb solder), but also in the future high-power (and high operating temperatures) TEM design (using Si or SiGe as the thermoelectric material and Gold100 as the appropriate solder), might be low enough, so that the short- and long-term reliability of the TEM structure could still be assured. We have found, however, that thin-and-long legs should be considered for lower stresses, but not to an extent that appreciable bending deformations of the legs become possible. Future work will include, but might not be limited to, the finite-element computations and to experimental evaluations (e.g., shear-off testing) of the stress-at-failure for the TEMs of interest.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Lang, G. A., Fehder, B. J., and Williams, W. D., 1970, “Thermal Fatigue in Silicon Power Transistors,” IEEE Trans. Electron Dev., 17(9), pp. 737–793. [CrossRef]
J. H.Lau, ed., 1993, Thermal Stress and Strain in Microelectronics Packaging, Van-Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Bar-Cohen, A., and Witzman, S., 1995, “Thermally-Induced Failures in Electronic Equipment—Field Reliability Modeling,” Int. J. Microelectron. Packaging, 1, pp. 1–7.
Zeyfang, R., 1971, “Stresses and Strains in a Plate Bonded to a Substrate: Semiconductor Devices,” Solid State Electron., 14(10), pp. 1035–1039. [CrossRef]
Hokanson, K. E., and Bar-Cohen, A., 1995, “A Shear-Based Optimization of Adhesive Thickness for Die Bonding,” IEEE Trans. Components Packag. Manuf. Technol. Part A, 18(3), pp. 578–584. [CrossRef]
Driessen, A., Baets, R. G., McInerney, J. G., and Suhir, E., eds., 2003, Volume 4947: Laser Diodes, Optoelectronic Devices, and Heterogeneous Integration, Proceedings SPIE, Brugge, Belgium, October 28.
Suhir, E., 2009, “Thermal Stress in a Bi-Material Assembly With a ‘Piecewise-Continuous’ Bonding Layer: Theorem of Three Axial Forces,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys., 42(4), p. 045507. [CrossRef]
Suhir, E., 2009, “On a Paradoxical Situation Related to Bonded Joints: Could Stiffer Mid-Portions of a Compliant Attachment Result in Lower Thermal Stress?,” J. Solid Mech. Mater. Eng., 3(8), pp. 990–997. [CrossRef]
Suhir, E., 2001, “Predicted Thermal Stresses in a Bimaterial Assembly Adhesively Bonded at the Ends,” J. Appl. Phys., 89(1), pp. 120–129. [CrossRef]
Suhir, E., 2003, “Bimaterial Assembly With a Low Modulus Bonding Layer at the Ends,” J. Appl. Phys., 93, p. 3657. [CrossRef]
Suhir, E., 1995, “ ‘Global’ and ‘Local’ Thermal Mismatch Stresses in an Elongated Bi-Material Assembly Bonded at the Ends,” E.Suhir, ed., Structural Analysis in Microelectronic and Fiber-Optic Systems, Symposium Proceedings, ASME Press, New York.
Schen, M., Abe, H., and Suhir, E., 1994, “Thermal and Mechanical Behavior and Modeling,” ASME, AMD-Vol, New York.
Suhir, E., 1986, “Stresses in Bi-Metal Thermostats,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 53(3), pp. 657–660. [CrossRef]
Suhir, E., 1989, “Interfacial Stresses in Bimetal Thermostats,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 56(3), pp. 595–600. [CrossRef]
Kuo, A.-Y., 1989, “Thermal Stresses at the Edge of a Bimetallic Thermostat,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 56(3), pp. 585–589. [CrossRef]
Eischen, J. W., Chung, C., and Kim, J. H., 1990, “Realistic Modeling of Edge Effect Stresses in Bimaterial Elements,” ASME J. Electron. Packaging, 112(1), pp. 16–23. [CrossRef]
Min, G., and Rowe, D. M., 1999, “A Novel Thermoelectric Converter Employing Fermi Gas/ Liquid Interfaces,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys., 32, p. L26. [CrossRef]
Clin, T. H., Turenne, S., Vasilevskiy, D., and Masut, R. A., 2009, “Numerical Simulation of the Thermomechanical Behavior of Extruded Bismuth Telluride Alloy Module,” J. Electron. Mater., 38(7), pp. 994–1001 [CrossRef].
Yazawa, K., and Shakouri, A., 2010, “Cost-Efficiency Trade-Off and the Design of Thermoelectric Power Generators,” Environ. Sci. Technol., 45(17), pp. 7548–7553. [CrossRef]
Bell, L. E., 2008, “Cooling, Heating, Generating Power, and Recovering Waste Heat With Thermoelectric Systems,” Science, 321(5895), pp. 1457–1461. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Leonov, V., and Vullers, R. J. M., 2009, “Wearable Thermoelectric Generators for Body-Powered Devices,” J. Electron. Mater., 38(7), pp. 1491–1498 [CrossRef].
Yazawa, K., Solbrekken, G. L., and Bar-Cohen, A., 2005, “Thermoelectric-Powered Convective Cooling of Microprocessors,” IEEE Trans. Adv. Packaging, 28(2), pp. 231–239. [CrossRef]
Fukutani, K., and Shakouri, A., 2006, “Design of Bulk Thermoelectric Modules for Integrated Circuit Thermal Management,” IEEE Trans. Compon. Packaging Technol., 29(4), pp. 750–757 [CrossRef].
Mayer, P. M., and Ram, R. J., 2006, “Optimization of Heat Sink-Limited Thermoelectric Generators,” Nanoscale Microscale Thermophys. Eng., 10(2), pp. 143–155. [CrossRef]
Stevens, J. W., 2001, “Optimum Design of Small ΔT Thermoelectric Generation Systems,” Energy Convers. Manage., 42(6), pp. 709–720. [CrossRef]
Kraemer, D.,Poudel, B., Feng, H.-P., Caylor, J. C., Yu, B., Yan, X., Ma, Y., Wang, X., Wang, D., Muto, A., McEnaney, K., Chiesa, M., Ren, Z., and Chen, G., 2011, “High-Performance Flat-Panel Solar Thermoelectric Generators With High Thermal Concentration,” Nat. Mater., 10, pp. 532–538. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gao, J.-L., Du, Q.-G., Zhang, X.-D., and Jiang, X.-Q., 2011, “Thermal Stress Analysis and Structure Parameter Selection for a Be2Te3-Based Thermoelectric Module,” J. Electron. Mater., 40(5), pp. 884–888. [CrossRef]
Antonova, E. E., and Looman, D. C., 2005, “Finite Elements for Thermoelectric Device Analysis,” 24th International Conference on Thermoelectrics (ICT 2005), Clemson, SC, June 19–23, pp. 215–218 [CrossRef].
Suhir, E., and Shakouri, A., 2012, “Assembly Bonded at the Ends: Could Thinner and Longer Legs Result in a Lower Thermal Stress in a Thermoelectric Module (TEM) Design?,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 79(6), p. 061010. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Thermoelectric module (TEM)/power generator [19]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

An example of a conventional TEM design (in our analysis, the upper plate is component 1 and the lower plate is component 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

UCSC TEM design with thinner legs (in our analysis, the upper plate is component 1 and the lower plate is component 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematics of the structure addressed in this article



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In