Computation of Stress and Strain Evolution During Heat Treatment of Work Rolls

[+] Author and Article Information
José Risso, Andres Anca

 CIMEC - INTEC (UNL/Conicet), Güemes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina

Alberto Cardona

 CIMEC - INTEC (UNL/Conicet), Güemes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentinaacardona@intec.unl.edu.ar

Violeta Colpachi

Research & Development, Fundición San Cayetano, L.M. Drago y Melián, 1852 Burzaco, Argentina

J. Appl. Mech 73(6), 1045-1053 (Jan 03, 2006) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2198247 History: Received September 27, 2005; Revised January 03, 2006

We present a numerical simulation of heat treatment of cast metallic alloys by the finite element method, to predict strains and stresses produced during the said process. From a computational point of view, this problem involves a coupled thermal-metallurgical-mechanical analysis modeled as a non-stationary and non-linear process. The calculation of metallurgical properties is coupled directly with thermal analysis. Material properties, which are dependent on temperature and microstructural composition, are rewritten for the purpose of the analysis as functions of temperature and time. Results of thermo-metallurgical analysis are taken as data for the subsequent mechanical analysis. The simulation was successful and proved the causes of failure during heat treatment of a centrifugally cast three-layered Hi-Chrome work roll.

Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Conductivity versus time/temperature diagram—detail in the quenching cooling zone

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

(Left) Work roll main dimensions, (right) FEM mesh

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Observed cracks in the barrel of work rolls

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Temperature-time-transformation diagram for Hi-Cr iron (shell)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Temperature-time-transformation diagram for SG iron (core)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Comparison between calculated and measured temperatures in barrel midpoint

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Temperature evolution during quenching cooling

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Intermediate state during austenizing heating (point A, 110h)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

End of austenizing heating (point B, 156h)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Intermediate state during quenching cooling (point C, 166h)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

End of quenching cooling (point D, 332h)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

End of second tempering cooling (point E, 792h)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

Evolution of equivalent plastic strain

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Approximation of temperature-time transformation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Conductivity versus temperature approximation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Conductivity versus time/temperature diagram



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In