Discussion: “On the Relationship Between the L-Integral and the Bueckner Work-Conjugate Integral” (Shi, J. P., Liu, X. H., and Li, J., 2000 ASME J. Appl. Mech., 67, pp. 828–829)

Chen , Y. Z.; Lee , K. Y.

doi:10.1115/1.1491577

Three wrong expressions in the paper (1) have been found. Equations (⁴) and (⁵) in the paper are written in the forms

φ^{(II)} (z) = - i φ^{'} (z), ψ^{(II)} (z) = - iz ψ^{'} (z) + 2 iz {\bar{φ}}^{'} (z),

(1)

{u_{i}}^{(II)} = {yu}_{i, x} - {xu}_{i, y}

(2)

{σ_{ij}}^{(II)} = y σ_{ij, x} - x σ_{ij, y} + \frac{1}{2} \int σ_{ij, x} dy - \frac{1}{2} \int σ_{ij, y} dx (i, j = 1, 2) .

(3)

1 Complex potentials suggested by Muskhelishvili should be an analytic function (2). However, since the argument $z ¯$ is involved in the second term of $ψ^{(II)} (z)$ in Eq. (¹), $ψ^{(II)} (z)$ cannot be an analytic function. Therefore, $ψ^{(II)} (z)$ in Eq. (¹) is a wrong expression.

2 In the complex variable function method, the displacement components can be expressed as (2)

2 G (u + iv) = κ φ (z) - z \bar{φ^{'} (z)} - \bar{ψ (z)} = κ φ (z) + z {- \bar{φ^{'} (z)}} - \bar{ψ (z)}

(4)

where G is the shear modulus of elasticity,

κ = (3 - ν) / (1 + ν)

is for the plane stress problem,

κ = 3 - 4 ν

is for the plane strain problem, and ν is the Poisson’s ratio, and

φ (z)

and

ψ (z)

are two analytic functions.

Equation (⁴) reveals a rule that in a real displacement expression of plane elasticity, if the function after the elastic constant κ is $φ (z),$ the term after z in Eq. (⁴) should be $- \bar{φ^{'} (z)} .$

On the other hand, from Eq. (⁴) we have

2 G (\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + i \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}) = (κ φ^{'} (z) - \bar{φ^{'} (z)}) - (z \bar{φ^{″} (z)} + \bar{ψ^{'} (z)})

2 G (\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} + i \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}) = i {(κ φ^{'} (z) - \bar{φ^{'} (z)}) + (z \bar{φ^{″} (z)} + \bar{ψ^{'} (z)})} .

(5)

Therefore, from Eqs. (²) and (⁵), the displacement components in Eq. (²) can be expressed as

2 G (u^{(II)} + {iv}^{(II)}) = 2 G (y (\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + i \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}) - x (\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} + i \frac{\partial v}{\partial y})) = κ {- iz φ^{'} (z)} + z {i (\bar{φ^{'} (z)} - z ¯ \bar{φ^{″} (z)})} - iz ¯ \bar{ψ^{'} (z)} .

(6)

From the fact that

- \bar{\frac{d}{dz} {- iz φ^{'} (z)}} = - i (\bar{φ^{'} (z)} + z ¯ \bar{φ^{″} (z)}) \neq i (\bar{φ^{'} (z)} - z ¯ \bar{φ^{″} (z)})

(7)

and the rule mentioned above, the displacements

u^{(II)}

and

v^{(II)}

shown in Eq. (²) are not an elasticity solution. Therefore, the displacement shown in Eq. (²) is also a wrong expression.

3 In Eq. (³) an indefinite integral is used to express the stress components. In the continuum medium of elastic body, the integral should be path-independent. Also, it is well known that if a function

F (x, y)

F (x, y) = \int_{(x_{o}, y_{o})}^{(x, y)} p (x, y) dx + q (x, y) dy

(8)

is a path independent integral, the following condition must be satisfied:

\frac{\partial p (x, y)}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial q (x, y)}{\partial x} or \frac{\partial q (x, y)}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial p (x, y)}{\partial y} = 0 .

(9)

If Eq. (³) were true, substituting

p (x, y) = - σ_{ij, y} / 2

and

q (x, y) = σ_{ij, x} / 2

into Eq. (⁹) yields the following:

\frac{\partial^{2} σ_{ij}}{\partial x^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2} σ_{ij}}{\partial y^{2}} = 0 .

(10)

However, the stress components

σ_{ij}

are not a harmonic function in general. Thus, the

{σ_{ij}}^{(II)}

shown by Eq. (³) is also a wrong expression.

1.

Shi

,

J. P.

,

Liu

,

X. H.

, and

Li

,

J. M.

,

2000

, “

On the Relation Between the L-integral and the Bueckner Work-Conjugate Integral

,”

ASME J. Appl. Mech.

,

67

, pp.

828

–

829

.

2.

Muskhelishvili, N. I., 1953, Some Basic Problems of Mathematical Theory of Elasticity, Noordhoof, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

by ASME

Discussion: “On the Relationship Between the L-Integral and the Bueckner Work-Conjugate Integral” (Shi, J. P., Liu, X. H., and Li, J., 2000 ASME J. Appl. Mech., 67, pp. 828–829)

Contents

Data & Figures

Supplements

References

Get Email Alerts

Cited By

ASME Journals

ASME Conference Proceedings

ASME eBooks

Resources

Opportunities

Discussion: “On the Relationship Between the L-Integral and the Bueckner Work-Conjugate Integral” (Shi, J. P., Liu, X. H., and Li, J., 2000 ASME J. Appl. Mech., 67, pp. 828–829)

Contents

Data & Figures

Supplements

References

Related

Get Email Alerts

Cited By

Related Articles

Related Proceedings Papers

Related Chapters

ASME Journals

ASME Conference Proceedings

ASME eBooks

Resources

Opportunities

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only