Research Papers

Quasi-Static Crack Growth Under Symmetrical Loads in Hydraulic Fracturing

[+] Author and Article Information
Wenhao Shen

State Key Laboratory of Nonlinear
Mechanics (LNM),
Institute of Mechanics,
Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Beijing 100190, China;
School of Engineering Science,
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Beijing 100049, China

Ya-Pu Zhao

State Key Laboratory of Nonlinear
Mechanics (LNM),
Institute of Mechanics,
Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Beijing 100190, China;
School of Engineering Science,
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Beijing 100049, China
e-mail: yzhao@imech.ac.cn

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Applied Mechanics Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS. Manuscript received March 12, 2017; final manuscript received June 4, 2017; published online June 20, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Thomas Siegmund.

J. Appl. Mech 84(8), 081009 (Jun 20, 2017) (10 pages) Paper No: JAM-17-1143; doi: 10.1115/1.4036988 History: Received March 12, 2017; Revised June 04, 2017

Symmetrical load on the crack surfaces is found in many fluid–solid problems. The combined effect of symmetrical normal and shear stresses is investigated, which impacts on the displacement and stress fields and the predictions of crack initiation and deflection. The boundary integral equations of displacement and stress fields are formulated using the integral-transform method. The equations of the displacement and stress are reduced using the Abel integral equations. The analytical solution of the full space for uniform normal and shear stresses is obtained. The asymptotic solution of the displacement of the crack surface is obtained near the crack tip under specific normal and shear stresses. Results show that shear stress tends to inhibit the crack, and the predictions of crack initiation and deflection could be inappropriate for a slit crack under a singular shear stress. This study may be useful for future investigations of the fluid–solid problems and help to understand the hydraulic fracturing.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Spence, D. A. , and Sharp, P. , 1985, “ Self-Similar Solutions for Elastohydrodynamic Cavity Flow,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 400(1819), pp. 289–313. [CrossRef]
Tsai, V. C. , and Rice, J. R. , 2010, “ A Model for Turbulent Hydraulic Fracture and Application to Crack Propagation at Glacier Beds,” J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf., 115(F3), ▪.
Detournay, E. , 2016, “ Mechanics of Hydraulic Fractures,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 48(1), pp. 311–339. [CrossRef]
Wrobel, M. , Mishuris, G. , and Piccolroaz, A. , 2017, “ Energy Release Rate in Hydraulic Fracture: Can We Neglect an Impact of the Hydraulically Induced Shear Stress?,” Int. J. Eng. Sci., 111, pp. 28–51. [CrossRef]
Yang, F. Q. , and Zhao, Y. P. , 2016, “ The Effect of a Capillary Bridge on the Crack Opening of a Penny Crack,” Soft Matter, 12(5), pp. 1586–1592. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Griffith, A. A. , 1921, “ The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 221(582–593), pp. 163–198. [CrossRef]
Irwin, G. R. , 1957, “ Analysis of Stresses and Strains Near the End of a Crack Traversing a Plate,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 24(▪), pp. 361–364.
Rice, J. R. , 1968, “ A Path Independent Integral and the Approximate Analysis of Strain Concentration by Notches and Cracks,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 35(2), pp. 379–386. [CrossRef]
Sih, G. C. , 1974, “ Strain-Energy-Density Factor Applied to Mixed Mode Crack Problems,” Int. J. Fract., 10(3), pp. 305–321. [CrossRef]
Sneddon, I. N. , and Lowengrub, M. , 1969, Crack Problems in the Classical Theory of Elasticity, Wiley, New York.
Williams, M. L. , 1956, “ On the Stress Distribution at the Base of a Stationary Crack,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 24(1), pp. 109–114.
Geertsma, J. , and de Klerk, F. , 1969, “ A Rapid Method of Predicting Width and Extent of Hydraulically Induced Fractures,” J. Pet. Technol., 21(12), pp. 1571–1581. [CrossRef]
Desroches, J. , Detournay, E. , Lenoach, B. , Papanastasiou, P. , Pearson, J. R. A. , Thiercelin, M. , and Cheng, A. , 1994, “ The Crack Tip Region in Hydraulic Fracturing,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 447(1929), pp. 39–48. [CrossRef]
Jeffrey, R. , 1989, “ The Combined Effect of Fluid Lag and Fracture Toughness on Hydraulic Fracture Propagation,” Low Permeability Reservoirs Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Paper No. 18957, pp. 269–276.
Advani, S. , Lee, T. S. , Dean, R. H. , Pak, C. K. , and Avasthi, J. M. , 1997, “ Consequences of Fluid Lag in Three-Dimensional Hydraulic Fractures,” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., 21(4), pp. 229–240. [CrossRef]
Garagash, D. I. , 2006, “ Propagation of a Plane-Strain Hydraulic Fracture With a Fluid Lag: Early-Time Solution,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 43(18), pp. 5811–5835. [CrossRef]
Yang, F. , 1998, “ Indentation of an Incompressible Elastic Film,” Mech. Mater., 30(4), pp. 275–286. [CrossRef]
Gorenflo, R. , and Vessella, S. , 1991, Abel Integral Equations, Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin.
Lawn, B. , 1993, Fracture of Brittle Solids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Zhao, Y. P. , 2016, Modern Continuum Mechanics (in Chinese), Science Press, Beijing, China.
Zhao, Y. P. , 2014, Nano and Mesoscopic Mechanics (in Chinese), Science Press, Beijing, China.
Jeffrey, A. , and Daniel, Z. , 2007, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, Academic Press, Burlington, VT.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of symmetrical normal and shear stresses on a slit crack. The stresses are symmetrical about both the coordinate axes.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Normalized displacement of the solid in the first quadrant. A uniform and negative shear stress acts on the crack surface. Arrows represent displacement vectors. Solid lines are tangent to the displacement.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Dimensionless stress component, σ̃11, in front of the crack tip under different normal stresses (x̃2=0+)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Negative dimensionless stress component, −σ̃11, in front of the crack tip under different shear stresses (x̃2=0+)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Angular distributions of normalized maximum principal stress near the crack tip (r̃=10–4)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Angular distributions of normalized strain energy density, fS, and stress components, frr, frθ and fθθ, near the crack tip (r̃=10–4)



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In