0
Research Papers

Geometric Nonlinearity Effects in the Response of Sandwich Wide Panels

[+] Author and Article Information
Zhangxian Yuan

School of Aerospace Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332-0150

George A. Kardomateas

Professor
School of Aerospace Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332-0150

Yeoshua Frostig

Professor
Faculty of Civil and
Environmental Engineering,
Technion Israel Institute of Technology,
Haifa 32000, Israel

Contributed by the Applied Mechanics Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS. Manuscript received April 19, 2016; final manuscript received May 16, 2016; published online June 27, 2016. Editor: Yonggang Huang.

J. Appl. Mech 83(9), 091008 (Jun 27, 2016) (10 pages) Paper No: JAM-16-1194; doi: 10.1115/1.4033651 History: Received April 19, 2016; Revised May 16, 2016

In the literature, there are various simplifying assumptions adopted in the kinematic relations of the faces and the core when considering a geometrically nonlinear problem in sandwich structures. Most commonly, only one nonlinear term is included in the faces and the core nonlinearities are neglected. A critical assessment of these assumptions, as well as the effects of including the other nonlinear terms in the faces and the core, is the scope of this paper. The comprehensive investigation of all the nonlinear terms is accomplished by deriving and employing an advanced nonlinear high-order theory, namely, the recently developed “extended high-order sandwich panel theory” (EHSAPT). This theory, which was derived as a linear theory, is first formulated in this paper in its full nonlinear version for the simpler one-dimensional case of sandwich wide panels/beams. Large displacements and moderate rotations are taken into account in both faces and core. In addition, a nonlinear EHSAPT-based finite element (FE) is developed. A series of simplified models with various nonlinear terms included are derived accordingly to check the validity of each of these assumptions. Two sandwich panel configurations, one with a “soft” and one with a “hard” core, loaded in three-point bending, are analyzed. The geometric nonlinearity effects and the relative merits of the corresponding simplifications are analyzed with these two numerical examples. In addition to a relative comparison among all these different assumptions, the results are also compared to the corresponding ones from a commercial FE code.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Definition of the geometry and coordinate system for the sandwich panel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Sketch of the EHSAPT-based FE model (two-node element)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Load versus midspan displacement of sandwich panel with soft core

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Displacement profile in faces and core at P=1300N: (a) axial displacement and (b) transverse displacement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Strain and stress distribution in the core at x=0.5a : (a) axial strain, (b) transverse normal strain, (c) axial stress, and (d) transverse normal stress

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Strain and stress distribution in the core at x=0.4a : (a) axial strain, (b) transverse normal strain, (c) axial stress, (d) transverse normal stress, and (e) shear stress

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Resultant axial force versus applied load

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Load versus midspan displacement of sandwich panel with moderate core

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In