0
Research Papers

Asymmetric Bifurcation of Initially Curved Nanobeam

[+] Author and Article Information
X. Chen

Mechanics and Aerospace Design Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical
and Industrial Engineering,
University of Toronto,
5 King's College Road,
Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada

S. A. Meguid

Fellow ASME
Mechanics and Aerospace Design Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical
and Industrial Engineering,
University of Toronto,
5 King's College Road,
Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada
e-mail: meguid@mie.utoronto.ca

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Applied Mechanics Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS. Manuscript received April 13, 2015; final manuscript received May 14, 2015; published online June 16, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Taher Saif.

J. Appl. Mech 82(9), 091003 (Sep 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: JAM-15-1192; doi: 10.1115/1.4030647 History: Received April 13, 2015; Revised May 14, 2015; Online June 16, 2015

In this paper, we investigate the asymmetric bifurcation behavior of an initially curved nanobeam accounting for Lorentz and electrostatic forces. The beam model was developed in the framework of Euler–Bernoulli beam theory, and the surface effects at the nanoscale were taken into account in the model by including the surface elasticity and the residual surface tension. Based on the Galerkin decomposition method, the model was simplified as two degrees of freedom reduced order model, from which the symmetry breaking criterion was derived. The results of our work reveal the significant surface effects on the symmetry breaking criterion for the considered nanobeam.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Ekinci, K. L., and Roukes, M. L., 2005, “Nanoelectromechanical Systems,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 76(6), p. 061101. [CrossRef]
Dequesnes, M., Rotkin, S. V., and Aluru, N. R., 2002, “Calculation of Pull-In Voltages for Carbon-Nanotube-Based Nanoelectromechanical Switches,” Nanotechnology, 13(1), pp. 120–131. [CrossRef]
Kinaret, J. M., Nord, T., and Viefers, S., 2003, “A Carbon-Nanotube-Based Nanorelay,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 82(8), pp. 1287–1289. [CrossRef]
Ke, C.-H., Pugno, N., Peng, B., and Espinosa, H. D., 2005, “Experiments and Modeling of Carbon Nanotube-Based NEMS Devices,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 53(6), pp. 1314–1333. [CrossRef]
Ramezani, A., Alasty, A., and Akbari, J., 2007, “Closed-Form Solutions of the Pull-In Instability in Nano-Cantilevers Under Electrostatic and Intermolecular Surface Forces,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 44(14–15), pp. 4925–4941. [CrossRef]
Mousavi, T., Bornassi, S., and Haddadpour, H., 2013, “The Effect of Small Scale on the Pull-In Instability of Nano-Switches Using DQM,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 50(9), pp. 1193–1202. [CrossRef]
Charlot, B., Sun, W., Yamashita, K., Fujita, H., and Toshiyoshi, H., 2008, “Bistable Nanowire for Micromechanical Memory,” J. Micromech. Microeng., 18(5), p. 045005. [CrossRef]
Intaraprasonk, V., and Fan, S., 2011, “Nonvolatile Bistable All-Optical Switch From Mechanical Buckling,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 98(24), p. 241104. [CrossRef]
Medina, L., Gilat, R., and Krylov, S., 2012, “Symmetry Breaking in an Initially Curved Micro Beam Loaded by a Distributed Electrostatic Force,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 49(3), pp. 1864–1876. [CrossRef]
Pippard, A. B., 1990, “The Elastic Arch and Its Modes of Instability,” Eur. J. Phys., 11(6), pp. 359–365. [CrossRef]
Patricio, P., Adda-Bedia, M., and Ben Amar, M., 1998, “An Elastic Problem: Instabilities of an Elastic Arch,” Physica D, 124(1–3), pp. 285–295. [CrossRef]
Krylov, S., Ilic, B. R., Schreiber, D., Seretensky, S., and Craighead, H., 2008, “The Pull-In Behavior of Electrostatically Actuated Bistable Microstructures,” J. Micromech. Microeng., 18(5), p. 055026. [CrossRef]
Pane, I. Z., and Asano, T., 2008, “Investigation on Bistability and Fabrication of Bistable Prestressed Curved Beam,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 47(6), pp. 5291–5296. [CrossRef]
Park, S., and Hah, D., 2008, “Pre-Shaped Buckled-Beam Actuators: Theory and Experiments,” Sens. Actuators, A, 148(1), pp. 186–192. [CrossRef]
Das, K., and Batra, R. C., 2009, “Pull-In and Snap-Through Instabilities in Transient Deformations of Microelectromechanical Systems,” J. Micromech. Microeng., 19(9), p. 035008. [CrossRef]
Medina, L., Gilat, R., and Krylov, S., 2014, “Symmetry Breaking in an Initially Curved Pre-Stressed Micro Beam Loaded by a Distributed Electrostatic Force,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 51(11–12), pp. 2047–2061. [CrossRef]
Medina, L., Gilat, R., Ilic, B., and Krylov, S., 2014, “Experimental Investigation of the Snap-Through Buckling of Electrostatically Actuated Initially Curved Pre-Stressed Micro Beams,” Sens. Actuators, A, 220, pp. 323–332. [CrossRef]
Poncharal, P., Wang, Z. L., Ugarte, D., and de Heer, W. A., 1999, “Electrostatic Deflections and Electromechanical Resonances of Carbon Nanotubes,” Science, 283(5407), pp. 1513–1516. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Salvetat, J.-P., Briggs, G. A. D., Bonard, J.-M., Bacsa, R. R., Kulik, A. J., Stöckli, T., Burnham, N. A., and Forro, L., 1999, “Elastic and Shear Moduli of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Ropes,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 82(5), pp. 944–947. [CrossRef]
Li, X., Ono, T., Wang, Y., and Esashi, M., 2003, “Ultrathin Single-Crystalline-Silicon Cantilever Resonators: Fabrication Technology and Significant Specimen Size Effect on Young's Modulus,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 83(15), pp. 3081–3083. [CrossRef]
Jing, G. Y., Duan, H. L., Sun, X. M., Zhang, Z. S., Xu, J., Li, Y. D., Wang, J. X., and Yu, D. P., 2006, “Surface Effects on Elastic Properties of Silver Nanowires: Contact Atomic-Force Microscopy,” Phys. Rev. B, 73(23), p. 235409. [CrossRef]
Shin, M. K., Kim, S. I., Kim, S. J., Kim, S.-K., Lee, H., and Spinks, G. M., 2006, “Size-Dependent Elastic Modulus of Single Electroactive Polymer Nanofibers,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 89(23), p. 231929. [CrossRef]
Miller, R. E., and Shenoy, V. B., 2000, “Size-Dependent Elastic Properties of Nanosized Structural Elements,” Nanotechnology, 11(3), pp. 139–147. [CrossRef]
Dingreville, R., Qu, J., and Cherkaoui, M., 2005, “Surface Free Energy and Its Effect on the Elastic Behavior of Nano-Sized Particles, Wires and Films,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 53(8), pp. 1827–1854. [CrossRef]
Zhu, H. X., 2010, “Size-Dependent Elastic Properties of Micro- and Nano-Honeycombs,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 58(5), pp. 696–709. [CrossRef]
Sadeghian, H., Goosen, H., Bossche, A., Thijsse, B., and van Keulen, F., 2011, “On the Size-Dependent Elasticity of Silicon Nanocantilevers: Impact of Defects,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 44(7), p. 072001. [CrossRef]
He, J., and Lilley, C. M., 2008, “Surface Effect on the Elastic Behavior of Static Bending Nanowires,” Nano Lett., 8(7), pp. 1798–1802. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wang, G.-F., and Feng, X.-Q., 2007, “Effects of Surface Elasticity and Residual Surface Tension on the Natural Frequency of Microbeams,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 90(23), p. 231904. [CrossRef]
Wang, G.-F., and Feng, X.-Q., 2009, “Surface Effects on Buckling of Nanowires Under Uniaxial Compression,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 94(14), p. 141913. [CrossRef]
Fu, Y., Zhang, J., and Jiang, Y., 2010, “Influences of the Surface Energies on the Nonlinear Static and Dynamic Behaviors of Nanobeams,” Physica E, 42(9), pp. 2268–2273. [CrossRef]
Fu, Y., and Zhang, J., 2011, “Size-Dependent Pull-In Phenomena in Electrically Actuated Nanobeams Incorporating Surface Energies,” Appl. Math. Model., 35(2), pp. 941–951. [CrossRef]
Chen, X., and Meguid, S. A., 2015, “Snap-Through Buckling of Initially Curved Microbeam Subject to an Electrostatic Force,” Proc. R. Soc. A, 471(2177), p. 20150072. [CrossRef]
Gurtin, M. E., and Murdoch, A. I., 1975, “A Continuum Theory of Elastic Material Surfaces,” Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 57(4), pp. 291–323. [CrossRef]
Gurtin, M. E., and Murdoch, A. I., 1978, “Surface Stress in Solids,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 14(6), pp. 431–440. [CrossRef]
Chen, C. Q., Shi, Y., Zhang, Y. S., Zhu, J., and Yan, Y. J., 2006, “Size Dependence of Young's Modulus in ZnO Nanowires,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 96(7), p. 075505. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Steigmann, D. J., and Ogden, R. W., 1997, “Plane Deformations of Elastic Solids With Intrinsic Boundary Elasticity,” Proc. R. Soc. London A, 453(1959), pp. 853–877. [CrossRef]
Steigmann, D. J., and Ogden, R. W., 1999, “Elastic Surface-Substrate Interactions,” Proc. R. Soc. London A, 455(1982), pp. 437–474. [CrossRef]
Song, F., Huang, G. L., Park, H. S., and Liu, X. N., 2011, “A Continuum Model for the Mechanical Behavior of Nanowires Including Surface and Surface-Induced Initial Stresses,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 48(14–15), pp. 2154–2163. [CrossRef]
Ko, J. S., Lee, M. L., Lee, D.-S., Choi, C. A., and Kim, Y. T., 2002, “Development and Application of a Laterally Driven Electromagnetic Microactuator,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 81(3), pp. 547–549. [CrossRef]
Das, K., and Batra, R. C., 2009, “Symmetry Breaking, Snap-Through and Pull-In Instabilities Under Dynamic Loading of Microelectromechanical Shallow Arches,” Smart Mater. Struct., 18(11), p. 115008. [CrossRef]
Batra, R. C., Porfiri, M., and Spinello, D., 2007, “Review of Modeling Electrostatically Actuated Microelectromechanical Systems,” Smart Mater. Struct., 16(6), pp. R23–R31. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematics of instability behaviors of arch

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Initially curved double-clamped nanobeam under distributed transverse load

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Initially curved nanobeam actuated by Lorentz force. The directions of the magnetic flux, electric current, and Lorentz force are indicated.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Bifurcation diagram of nanobeam actuated by Lorentz force. ② and ③ are bifurcation points. The stretching parameter α = 96 and the residual surface tension parameter λs = 2. The inset in (b) shows the evolutions of the deformed beam.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Minimum allowable ratio (r/h)min between the initial arch rise r and the beam thickness h for the asymmetric bifurcation at different levels of h (normalized as h/(Es/E*)) and residual surface tension τ0 (normalized as τ0/Es). The beam length-to-thickness ratio L/h = 25.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Initially curved nanobeam actuated by electrostatic force (direction indicated by arrow)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Bifurcation diagram of nanobeam actuated by electrostatic force. ② and ③ are bifurcation points. The stretching parameter α = 600 and the residual surface tension parameter λs = 2.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Evolutions of asymmetric bifurcation points with dimensionless initial arch rise at different levels of the stretching parameter α. The dimensionless residual surface tension λs = 2.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Minimum allowable ratio (r/h)min between the initial arch rise r and the beam thickness h for the asymmetric bifurcation at different levels of h (normalized as h/(Es/E*)) and residual surface tension τ0 (normalized as τ0/Es). The beam length-to-thickness ratio L/h = 25.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In