0
Research Papers

Breakdown of a Pressurized Fingerlike Crack in a Permeable Solid

[+] Author and Article Information
Erfan Sarvaramini

Department of Civil and Resource Engineering,
Dalhousie University,
1360 Barrington Street,
Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
e-mail: erfan.sarvaramini@dal.ca

Dmitry I. Garagash

Department of Civil and Resource Engineering,
Dalhousie University,
1360 Barrington Street,
Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
e-mail: garagash@dal.ca

Existence of 1D leak-off regime relies on separation of timescales, t1t2, or A1 (Eq. (38)).

Note that the 2D scales (Eq. (34)) are the same for the two crack geometries.

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Applied Mechanics Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS. Manuscript received February 27, 2015; final manuscript received March 19, 2015; published online April 30, 2015. Editor: Yonggang Huang.

J. Appl. Mech 82(6), 061006 (Jun 01, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: JAM-15-1113; doi: 10.1115/1.4030172 History: Received February 27, 2015; Revised March 19, 2015; Online April 30, 2015

This paper is concerned with the analysis of a low-viscosity fluid injection into a pre-existing, fingerlike crack within a linear elastic, permeable rock, and of the conditions leading to the onset of the fracture propagation (i.e., the breakdown). The problem is of interest in reservoir waterflooding, supercritical CO2 injection for geological storage, and other subsurface fluid injection applications. Fluid injection into a stationary crack leads to its elastic dilation and pressurization, buffered by the fluid leak-off into the surrounding rock. The solution of the problem, therefore, requires coupling of the crack deformation and the full-space pore-fluid pressure diffusion in the permeable rock. Contrary to the case of propagating hydraulic fractures, when significant part of the energy input is dissipated in the viscous fluid flow in the fracture, we find that the viscous fluid pressure drop inside a stationary fracture can be often neglected (we establish the conditions when one can do so). This, in turn, allows for a semi-analytical solution of the problem using the Green's function method, and, furthermore, for the full analytical treatment of the small/large injection time asymptotics. We apply the transient pressurization solution to predict the onset of the propagation based on the criteria derived from the energy considerations for a fingerlike crack.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Keck, R. G., and Withers, R. J., 1994, “A Field Demonstration of Hydraulic Fracturing for Solids Waste Injection With Real-Time Passive Seismic Monitoring,” Society of Petroleum Engineers Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (SPE), New Orleans, LA, Sept. 25–28, Paper No. SPE-28495-MS. [CrossRef]
Moschovidis, Z. A., Gardner, D. C., and Veatch, R. W., 1994, “Disposal of Oily Cuttings by Downhole Periodic Fracturing Injections, Valhall, North Sea: Case Study and Modeling Concepts,” SPE Drill. Completion, 9(4), pp. 256–262. [CrossRef]
Willhite, G. P., 1986, Waterflooding (SPE Textbook Series), SPE, Richardson, TX.
Deutsch, M., 1963, “Groundwater Contamination and Legal Controls in Michigan,” U.S. Geological Survey of Water Supply–Paper 1691.
Raleigh, C. B., Healy, J. H., and Bredehoeft, J. D., 1976, “An Experiment in Earthquake Control at Rangely, Colorado,” Science, 191(4233), pp. 1230–1237. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Talwani, P., and Acree, S., 1985, “Pore Pressure Diffusion and the Mechanism of Reservoir-Induced Seismicity,” Pure Appl. Geophys., 122(6), pp. 947–965. [CrossRef]
Hsieh, P. A., and Bredehoeft, J. D., 1981, “A Reservoir Analysis of the Denver Earthquakes: A Case of Induced Seismicity,” J. Geophys. Res. B: Solid Earth, 86(B2), pp. 903–920. [CrossRef]
A.Daubrée, 1879, Etudes synthetiques de geologie experimentale, Dunod Éditeur, Paris.
Becker, G. F., 1891, “The Structure of a Portion of the Sierra Nevada of California,” Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 2(1), pp. 49–74. [CrossRef]
Pollard, D. D., and Aydin, A., 1988, “Progress in Understanding Joints Over the Last Century,” Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 100(8), pp. 1181–1204. [CrossRef]
Hodgson, R. A., 1961, “Classification of Structures on Joint Surfaces,” Am. J. Sci., 259(7), pp. 493–502. [CrossRef]
Engelder, T., 1982, “Is There a Genetic Relationship Between Selected Regional Joints and Contemporary Stress Within the Lithosphere of North America?,” Tectonics, 1(2), pp. 161–177. [CrossRef]
Pointe, P. R., and Hudson, J. A., 1985, “Characterization and Interpretation of Rock Mass Joint Patterns,” Geol. Assoc. Am. Spec. Pap., 199, pp. 1–38. [CrossRef]
Perkins, T. K., and Kern, L. R., 1961, “Widths of Hydraulic Fractures,” J. Pet. Technol., 13(9), pp. 937–949. [CrossRef]
Kovalyshen, Y., and Detournay, E., 2010, “A Reexamination of the Classical PKN Model of Hydraulic Fracture,” Transp. Porous Media, 81(2), pp. 317–339. [CrossRef]
Castillo, J. L., 1987, “Modified Fracture Pressure Decline Analysis Including Pressure-Dependent Leakoff,” Society of Petroleum Engineers Low Permeability Reservoirs Symposium (SPE), Denver, May 18–19, Paper No. SPE-16417-MS. [CrossRef]
Barree, R. D., and Mukherjee, H., 1996, “Determination of Pressure Dependent Leakoff and Its Effect on Fracture Geometry,” Society of Petroleum Engineers Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (SPE), Denver, Oct. 6–9, Paper No. SPE-36424-MS, pp. 85–94. [CrossRef]
Howard, G. C., and Fast, C. R., 1957, “Optimum Fluid Characteristics for Fracture Extension,” Drilling and Production Practices, American Petroleum Institute, New York, pp. 261–270.
Gordayev, Y. N., and Zazovsky, A. F., 1992, “Self-Similar Solution for Deep-Penetrating Hydraulic Fracture Propagation,” Transp. Porous Media, 7(3), pp. 283–304. [CrossRef]
Gordayev, Y. N., and Entov, V. M., 1997, “The Pressure Distribution Around a Growing Crack,” J. Appl. Math. Mech., 61(6), pp. 1025–1029. [CrossRef]
Mathias, S. A., and Reeuwijk, M., 2009, “Hydraulic Fracture Propagation With 3-D Leak-Off,” Transp. Porous Media, 80(3), pp. 499–518. [CrossRef]
Kovalyshen, Y., 2010, “Fluid-Driven Fracture in Poroelastic Medium,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Detournay, E., and Cheng, A. H.-D., 1991, “Plane Strain Analysis of a Stationary Hydraulic Fracture in a Poroelastic Medium,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 27(13), pp. 1645–1662. [CrossRef]
Nordgren, R. P., 1972, “Propagation of Vertical Hydraulic Fractures,” SPE, 12(4), pp. 306–314. [CrossRef]
Hutchinson, J. W., and Suo, Z., 1992, “Mixed Mode Cracking in Layered Materials,” Adv. Appl. Mech., 29, pp. 63–191. [CrossRef]
Nolte, K. G., 1991, “Fracturing-Pressure Analysis for Nonideal Behavior,” J. Pet. Technol., 43(2), pp. 210–218. [CrossRef]
Bear, J., 1988, Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media, Dover, New York.
Carslaw, H., and Jaeger, J. C., 1959, Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd ed., Oxford University, London.
Stehfest, H., 1970, “Algorithm 368: Numerical Inversion of Laplace Transforms [D5],” Commun. ACM, 13(1), pp. 47–49. [CrossRef]
Khristianovic, S. A., and Zheltov, Y. P., 1955, “Formation of Vertical Fractures by Means of Highly Viscous Fluids,” 4th World Petroleum Congress, Rome, June 6–15, Vol. II, pp. 579–586.
Geertsma, J., and de Klerk, F., 1969, “A Rapid Method of Predicting Width and Extent of Hydraulic Induced Fractures,” J. Pet. Technol., 21(12), pp. 1571–1581. [CrossRef]
Tada, H., Paris, P. C., and Irwin, G. R., 2000, The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, ASME, New York, pp. 55–56.
Michael, K., Golab, A., Shulakova, V., Ennis-King, J., Allinson, G., Sharma, S., and Aiken, T., 2010, “Geological Storage of CO2 in Saline Aquifers—A Review of the Experience From Existing Storage Operations,” Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 4(4), pp. 659–667. [CrossRef]
Rutqvist, J., Donald, W. V., and Larry, M., 2010, “Coupled Reservoir-Geomechanical Analysis of CO2 Injection and Ground Deformations at in Salah, Algeria,” Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 4(2), pp. 225–230. [CrossRef]
Bandis, S. C., Lumsden, A. C., and Barton, N. R., 1983, “Fundamentals of Rock Joint Deformation,” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr., 20(6), pp. 249–268. [CrossRef]
Detournay, E., and Cheng, A. H.-D., 1993, “Fundamentals of Poroelasticity,” Comprehensive Rock Engineering, Pergamon, New York, Vol. 2, pp. 113–171.
Sedov, L. I., 1971–1972, A Course in Continuum Mechanics, Walters-Noordhoff Publishing, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Zehnder, A. T., 2012, Fracture Mechanics (Lecture Notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics), Springer, London.
Patankar, S. V., 1980, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Hemisphere Publishing, Washington, DC.
Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. A., ed., 1972, Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, Dover, New York.
Watson, G. N., 1995, A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions, Cambridge University Press, London.
Erdogan, F., Gupta, G. D., and Cook, T. S., 1973, Numerical Solution of Singular Integral Equations (Mechanics of Fracture, Vol. 1), Noordhoff International Publishing, Leyden, The Netherlands, pp. 368–425.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Injection into a pre-existing fingerlike crack with length 2ℓ and height h (ℓ>>h)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Evolution of the cumulative leak-off volume in the auxiliary problem (step pressure increase along the crack). The numerical solution is contrasted to small (28) and large-time (29) asymptotes. The time and volume scales are t* = ℓ2/4α and V* = ΔphSℓ2, respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison of the numerical solution for the normalized leak-off rate in the auxiliary problem of an instantaneous step pressure increase Δp with (a) the small time (Eq. (24)) and (b) the large-time (Eq. (26)) asymptotes. The time and leak-off rate scales are t* = ℓ2/4α and g¯* = 4ΔpSα/ℓ, respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Injection at a constant rate into a crack in (a) impermeable rock (K = 0) and (b) permeable rock (K = 0.1): evolution of the normalized net pressure Π = p¯/p* with normalized time τ = t/t* at selected positions along the crack ξ = x/ℓ = 0 (inlet),0.1,0.5,1 (tip) in the case of zero neutral crack opening (W0 = 0). The characteristic pressure and time scales are p* = (μQ0E'3ℓ/h4)1/4 and t* = (μℓ5h4/E'Q03)1/4, respectively. Marked points correspond to the onset of approximate pressure uniformity in the crack.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Evolution of the normalized net pressure p¯/p1 during the transient pressurization of a crack for various values of the crack aspect ratio parameter A = h/(ℓSE'). The 1D (Eq. (38)) and 2D (Eq. (40)) leak-off asymptotic solutions are shown by dashed lines, respectively. The dotted line shows the early time storage-dominated solution (Eq. (39)a). The 1D pressure and time scales are p1 = Q0E't1/h2ℓ and t1 = (1/SE')2(h2/4α), respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Dependence of (a) uniformity net pressure p¯uni/p* and (b) uniformity time tuni/t* on the nondimensional neutral hydraulic opening W0 = w0(E'/μQ0ℓ)1/4 during the transient pressurization of a mechanically open fracture in impermeable rock. The characteristic pressure and time scales are p*= (μQ0E'3ℓ/h4)1/4 and t* = (μℓ5h4/E'Q03)1/4, respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Dependence of (a) uniformity net pressure p¯uni/p* and (b) uniformity time tuni/t* on the nondimensional permeability parameter K = k(ℓ1/3E'/Q0μ)3/4 during the transient pressurization of a mechanically open fracture with the aspect ratio parameter A = 0.01 and negligible neutral hydraulic opening W0 = 0

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In