0
Research Papers

Multiscale Mass-Spring Model for High-Rate Compression of Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotube Foams

[+] Author and Article Information
Ramathasan Thevamaran

Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences,
California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, CA 91125;
Department of Mechanical and
Process Engineering,
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology
(ETH Zurich),
Zurich 8092, Switzerland
e-mail: rthevama@caltech.edu

Fernando Fraternali

Department of Civil Engineering,
University of Salerno,
Fisciano, SA 84084, Italy
e-mail: f.fraternali@unisa.it

Chiara Daraio

Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences,
California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, CA 91125;
Department of Mechanical and
Process Engineering,
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology
(ETH Zurich),
Zurich 8092, Switzerland
e-mail: daraio@ethz.ch

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Applied Mechanics Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS. Manuscript received August 11, 2014; final manuscript received October 8, 2014; accepted manuscript posted October 13, 2014; published online October 27, 2014. Editor: Yonggang Huang.

J. Appl. Mech 81(12), 121006 (Oct 27, 2014) (6 pages) Paper No: JAM-14-1360; doi: 10.1115/1.4028785 History: Received August 11, 2014; Revised October 08, 2014; Accepted October 13, 2014

We present a one-dimensional, multiscale mass-spring model to describe the response of vertically aligned carbon nanotube (VACNT) foams subjected to uniaxial, high-rate compressive deformations. The model uses mesoscopic dissipative spring elements composed of a lower level chain of asymmetric, bilateral, bistable elastic springs to describe the experimentally observed deformation-dependent stress–strain responses. The model shows an excellent agreement with the experimental response of VACNT foams undergoing finite deformations and enables in situ identification of the constitutive parameters at the smaller lengthscales. We apply the model to two cases of VACNT foams impacted at 1.75 ms−1 and 4.44 ms−1 and describe their dynamic response.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Cao, A., Dickrell, P. L., Sawyer, W. G., Ghasemi-Nejhad, M. N., and Ajayan, P. M., 2005, “Super-Compressible Foamlike Carbon Nanotube Films,” Science, 310(5752), pp. 1307–1310. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gui, X., Wei, J., Wang, K., Cao, A., Zhu, H., Jia, Y., Shu, Q., and Wu, D., 2010, “Carbon Nanotube Sponges,” Adv. Mater., 22(5), pp. 617–621. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
De Volder, M. F. L., Tawfick, S. H., Baughman, R. H., and Hart, A. J., 2013, “Carbon Nanotubes: Present and Future Commercial Applications,” Science, 339(6119), pp. 535–539. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ci, L., Suhr, J., Pushparaj, V., Zhang, X., and Ajayan, P. M., 2008, “Continuous Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Composites,” Nano Lett., 8(9), pp. 2762–2766. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zhang, M., Atkinson, K. R., and Baughman, R. H., 2004, “Multifunctional Carbon Nanotube Yarns by Downsizing an Ancient Technology,” Science, 306(5700), pp. 1358–1361. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Thevamaran, R., and Daraio, C., 2014, “An Experimental Technique for the Dynamic Characterization of Soft Complex Materials,” Exp. Mech., 54(8), pp. 1319–1328. [CrossRef]
Thevamaran, R., Meshot, E. R., and Daraio, C., 2014, “Shock Formation and Rate Effects in Impacted Carbon Nanotube Foams,” Carbon (submitted).
Lattanzi, L., Raney, J. R., De Nardo, L., Misra, A., and Daraio, C., 2012, “Nonlinear Viscoelasticity of Freestanding and Polymer-Anchored Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotube Foams,” J. Appl. Phys., 111(7), p. 074314. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Q., Lu, Y. C., Du, F., Dai, L., Baur, J., and Foster, D. C., 2010, “Viscoelastic Creep of Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotubes,” J. Phys. D.: Appl. Phys., 43(31), p. 315401. [CrossRef]
Raney, J., Fraternali, F., and Daraio, C., 2013, “Rate-Independent Dissipation and Loading Direction Effects in Compressed Carbon Nanotube Arrays,” Nanotechnology, 24(25), p. 255707. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pathak, S., Lim, E. J., Abadi, P. P. S. S., Graham, S., Cola, B. A., and Greer, J. R., 2012, “Higher Recovery and Better Energy Dissipation at Faster Strain Rates in Carbon Nanotube Bundles: An In-Situ Study,” ACS Nano, 6(3), pp. 2189–2197. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Qiu, a., Fowler, S. P., Jiao, J., Kiener, D., and Bahr, D. F., 2011, “Time-Dependent Contact Behavior Between Diamond and a CNT Turf,” Nanotechnology, 22(29), p. 295702. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Xu, M., Futaba, D. N., Yamada, T., Yumura, M., and Hata, K., 2010, “Carbon Nanotubes With Temperature-Invariant Viscoelasticity From −196° to 1000°C,” Science, 330(6009), pp. 1364–1368. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Teo, E. H. T., Yung, W. K. P., Chua, D. H. C., and Tay, B. K., 2007, “A Carbon Nanomattress: A New Nanosystem With Intrinsic, Tunable, Damping Properties,” Adv. Mater., 19(19), pp. 2941–2945. [CrossRef]
Wang, L., Ortiz, C., and Boyce, M. C., 2011, “Mechanics of Indentation Into Micro- and Nanoscale Forests of Tubes, Rods, or Pillars,” ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 133(1), p. 011014. [CrossRef]
Hutchens, S. B., Needleman, A., and Greer, J. R., 2011, “Analysis of Uniaxial Compression of Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotubes,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 59(10), pp. 2227–2237. [CrossRef]
Maschmann, M. R., Ehlert, G. J., Tawfick, S., Hart, A. J., and Baur, J. W., 2014, “Continuum Analysis of Carbon Nanotube Array Buckling Enabled by Anisotropic Elastic Measurements and Modeling,” Carbon N. Y., 66, pp. 377–386. [CrossRef]
Yang, X., He, P., and Gao, H., 2011, “Modeling Frequency- and Temperature-Invariant Dissipative Behaviors of Randomly Entangled Carbon Nanotube Networks Under Cyclic Loading,” Nano Res., 4(12), pp. 1191–1198. [CrossRef]
Fraternali, F., Blesgen, T., Amendola, A., and Daraio, C., 2011, “Multiscale Mass-Spring Models of Carbon Nanotube Foams,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 59(1), pp. 89–102. [CrossRef]
Raney, J. R., Fraternali, F., Amendola, A., and Daraio, C., 2011, “Modeling and In Situ Identification of Material Parameters for Layered Structures Based on Carbon Nanotube Arrays,” Compos. Struct., 93(11), pp. 3013–3018. [CrossRef]
Blesgen, T., Fraternali, F., Raney, J., and Daraio, C., 2013, “Multiscale Mass-Spring Models of Carbon Nanotube Arrays Accounting for Mullins-Like Behavior and Permanent Deformation,” Multiscale Model. Simul., 11(2), pp. 545–565. [CrossRef]
Carretero-González, R., Khatri, D., Porter, M., Kevrekidis, P., and Daraio, C., 2009, “Dissipative Solitary Waves in Granular Crystals,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 102(2), p. 024102. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bedewy, M., Meshot, E. R., Guo, H., Verploegen, E. A., Lu, W., and Hart, A. J., 2009, “Collective Mechanism for the Evolution and Self-Termination of Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotube Growth,” J. Phys. Chem. C, 113(48), pp. 20576–20582. [CrossRef]
Puglisi, G., and Truskinovsky, L., 2005, “Thermodynamics of Rate-Independent Plasticity,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 53(3), pp. 655–679. [CrossRef]
Fraternali, F., Raney, J., and Daraio, C., 2013, “Modeling Microscale Instabilities in Compressed Carbon Nanotube Bundles Using Multistable Spring Models,” Compos. Struct., 96, pp. 745–750. [CrossRef]
Knap, J., and Ortiz, M., 2001, “An Analysis of the Quasicontinuum Method,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 49(9), pp. 1899–1923. [CrossRef]
Fraternali, F., Lorenz, C. D., and Marcelli, G., 2012, “On the Estimation of the Curvatures and Bending Rigidity of Membrane Networks Via a Local Maximum-Entropy Approach,” J. Comput. Phys., 231(2), pp. 528–540. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram showing the response of a generic mesoscopic dissipative spring element and the relevant constitutive parameters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Description of the model for the sample impacted at 1.75 ms−1. (a) Schematic of the experiment showing the sample being compressed by the striker against the rigidly mounted force sensor. (b) Three different models considered for the sample. (c) Optical images showing the pristine and deformed states of the sample [7]. Markers are used to highlight the deformed and undeformed sections of the sample.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison of the numerical and experimental results of stress–time histories, displacement–time histories, and stress–strain response for (a) model-1, (b) model-2, and (c) model-3 of the VACNT foam-1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) Optical images selected from the high-speed camera sequence showing the sample VACNT foam-2 before the impact (pristine state), at its maximum deformation (deformed state) and after load release (recovered state) [6]. The schematic diagram on the right shows the model employed and its relevant parameters. This sample was impacted at 4.44 ms−1. (b) Comparison of the numerical and experimental results for the stress–time history, displacement–time history and stress–strain response.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In