0
Research Papers

On Slip Inception and Static Friction for Smooth Dry Contact

[+] Author and Article Information
Xi Shi

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: xishi@sjtu.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Applied Mechanics Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS. Manuscript received July 14, 2014; final manuscript received October 5, 2014; accepted manuscript posted October 10, 2014; published online October 23, 2014. Editor: Yonggang Huang.

J. Appl. Mech 81(12), 121005 (Oct 23, 2014) (7 pages) Paper No: JAM-14-1307; doi: 10.1115/1.4028753 History: Received July 14, 2014; Revised October 05, 2014; Accepted October 10, 2014

Slip inception mechanism is very important for modeling of static friction and understanding of some experimental observations of friction. In this work, slip inception was treated as a local competence of interfacial bonding failure and weaker material failure. At any contacting point, if bond shear strength is weaker than softer material shear strength, slip inception is governed by interfacial bonding failure. Otherwise, it is governed by softer material failure. Considering the possible co-existence of these two slip inception mechanisms during presliding, a hybrid static friction model for smooth dry contact was proposed, which indicates that the static friction consists of two components: one contributed by contact area where bonding failure is dominant and the other contributed by contact area where material failure is dominant. With the proposed static friction model, the effects of contact pressure, the material properties, and the contact geometry on static friction were discussed.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Localized shear strength versus contact pressure for Coulomb friction [25]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Localized shear strength versus contact pressure based on Ref. [10]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Localized shear strength versus contact pressure based on Ref. [31]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Localized shear strength versus contact pressure based on Ref. [33]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Localized shear strength base on von Mises criterion

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Proposed slip inception model: localized shear strength versus contact pressure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Different localized shear strength behaviors at low contact pressure due to various interfacial bonding at static friction condition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Diagram of a sphere in contact with a flat

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Predicted static friction coefficient versus dimensionless mean contact pressure for both spherical and cylindric line contacts

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Effect of yield strength of soft material on localized shear strength

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Effect of the ratio k on predicted static friction coefficient for spherical contact

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In