0
Research Papers

On the Contact of Curved Rough Surfaces: Contact Behavior and Predictive Formulas

[+] Author and Article Information
Ali Beheshti

Department of Mechanical and
Industrial Engineering,
Louisiana State University,
2508 Patrick Taylor Hall,
Baton Rouge, LA 70803

M. M. Khonsari

Department of Mechanical and
Industrial Engineering,
Louisiana State University,
2508 Patrick Taylor Hall,
Baton Rouge, LA 70803
e-mail: Khonsari@me.lsu.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Applied Mechanics Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS. Manuscript received May 29, 2014; final manuscript received August 22, 2014; accepted manuscript posted August 28, 2014; published online September 24, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Taher Saif.

J. Appl. Mech 81(11), 111004 (Sep 24, 2014) (15 pages) Paper No: JAM-14-1235; doi: 10.1115/1.4028426 History: Received May 29, 2014; Revised August 22, 2014; Accepted August 28, 2014

The statistical microcontact models of Greenwood–Williamson (GW), Kogut–Etsion (KE), and Jackson–Green (JG) are employed along with the elastic bulk deformation of the contacting solids to predict the characteristics of rough elliptical point contact such as the pressure profile, real area of contact, and contact dimensions. In addition, the contribution of the bulk deformation and the asperity deformation to the total displacement is evaluated for different surface properties and loads. The approach involves solving the microcontact and separation equations simultaneously. Also presented are formulas that can be readily used for the prediction of the maximum contact pressure, contact dimensions, contact compliance, real area of contact, and pressure distribution.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Tabor, D., 1951, The Hardness of Metals, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
Kragelsky, I. V., 1982, Friction and Wear Calculation Methods, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.
Johnson, K. L., 1985, Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Zhu, D., and Hu, Y.-Z., 2001, “A Computer Program Package for the Prediction of EHL and Mixed Lubrication Characteristics, Friction, Subsurface Stresses and Flash Temperatures Based on Measured 3-D Surface Roughness,” Tribol. Trans., 44(3), pp. 383–390. [CrossRef]
Bahrami, M., Yovanovich, M. M., and Culham, J. R., 2007, “Role of Random Roughness on Thermal Performance of Microfins,” J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer, 21(1), pp. 153–157. [CrossRef]
Bhushan, B., and Jung, Y. C., 2008, “Wetting, Adhesion and Friction of Superhydrophobic and Hydrophilic Leaves and Fabricated Micro/Nanopatterned Surfaces,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 20(22), p. 225010. [CrossRef]
Peyvandi, A., Abideen, S. U., Huang, Y., Lee, I., Soroushian, P., and Lu, J., 2013, “Surface Treatment of Polymer Microfibrillar Structures for Improved Surface Wettability and Adhesion,” Appl. Surf. Sci., 289, pp. 586–591. [CrossRef]
Tan, G. B., Wang, D. G., Liu, S. H., and Zhang, S. W., 2013, “Frictional Behaviors of Rough Soft Contact on Wet and Dry Pipeline Surfaces: With Application to Deepwater Pipelaying,” Sci. China Technol. Sci., 56(12), pp. 3024–3032. [CrossRef]
Zhang, W., Jin, F., Zhang, S., and Guo, X., 2014, “Adhesive Contact on Randomly Rough Surfaces Based on the Double-Hertz Model,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 81(5), p. 051008. [CrossRef]
Aghdam, A., Beheshti, A., and Khonsari, M. M., 2014, “Prediction of Crack Nucleation in Rough Line-Contact Fretting Via Continuum Damage Mechanics Approach,” Tribol. Lett., 53(3), pp. 631–643. [CrossRef]
McCool, J. I., 1986, “Comparison of Models for the Contact of Rough Surfaces,” Wear, 107(1), pp. 37–60. [CrossRef]
Liu, G., Wang, Q. J., and Lin, C., 1999, “A Survey of Current Models for Simulating the Contact Between Rough Surfaces,” Tribol. Trans., 42(3), pp. 581–591. [CrossRef]
Adams, G. G., and Nosonovsky, M., 2000, “Contact Modeling—Forces,” Tribol. Int., 33(5–6), pp. 431–442. [CrossRef]
Pugliese, G., Tavares, S. M. O., Ciulli, E., and Ferreira, L. A., 2008, “Rough Contacts Between Actual Engineering Surfaces—Part II. Contact Mechanics,” Wear, 264(11–12), pp. 1116–1128. [CrossRef]
Renouf, M., Massi, F., Fillot, N., and Saulot, A., 2011, “Numerical Tribology of a Dry Contact,” Tribol. Int., 44(7–8), pp. 834–844. [CrossRef]
Greenwood, J. A., and Williamson, J. B. P., 1966, “Contact of Nominally Flat Surfaces,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A, 295(1442), pp. 300–319. [CrossRef]
McCool, J. I., 1986, “Predicting Microfracture in Ceramics Via a Microcontact Model,” ASME J. Tribol., 108(3), pp. 380–386. [CrossRef]
Chang, W. R., Etsion, I., and Bogy, D. B., 1987, “An Elastic–Plastic Model for the Contact of Rough Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 109(2), pp. 257–263. [CrossRef]
Zhao, Y. W., Maietta, D. M., and Chang, L., 2000, “An Asperity Microcontact Model Incorporating the Transition From Elastic Deformation to Fully Plastic Flow,” ASME J. Tribol., 122(1), pp. 86–93. [CrossRef]
Kogut, L., and Etsion, I., 2002, “Elastic–Plastic Contact Analysis of a Sphere and a Rigid Flat,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 69(5), pp. 657–662. [CrossRef]
Kogut, L., and Etsion, I., 2003, “A Finite Element Based Elastic–Plastic Model for the Contact of Rough Surfaces,” Tribol. Trans., 46(3), pp. 383–390. [CrossRef]
Jackson, R. L., and Green, I., 2005, “A Finite Element Study of Elasto-Plastic Hemispherical Contact Against a Rigid Flat,” ASME J. Tribol., 127(2), pp. 343–354. [CrossRef]
Jackson, R. L., and Green, I., 2006, “A Statistical Model of Elasto-Plastic Asperity Contact Between Rough Surfaces,” Tribol. Int., 39(9), pp. 906–914. [CrossRef]
Lo, C. C., 1969, “Elastic Contact of Rough Cylinders,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 11(1), pp. 105–115. [CrossRef]
Gelinck, E. R. M., and Schipper, D. J., 1999, “Deformation of Rough Line Contacts,” ASME J. Tribol., 121(3), pp. 449–454. [CrossRef]
Bryant, M. J., Evans, H. P., and Snidle, R. W., 2012, “Plastic Deformation in Rough Surface Line Contact—A Finte Element Study,” Tribol. Int., 46(1), pp. 269–278. [CrossRef]
Beheshti, A., and Khonsari, M. M., 2012, “Asperity Micro-Contact Models as Applied to the Deformation of Rough Line Contact,” Tribol. Int., 52, pp. 61–74. [CrossRef]
Greenwood, J. A., and Tripp, J. H., 1967, “Elastic Contact of Rough Spheres,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 34(1), pp. 153–159. [CrossRef]
Nuri, K. A., 1974, “Normal Approach Between Curved Surfaces in Contact,” Wear, 30(3), pp. 321–335. [CrossRef]
Kagami, J., Yamada, K., and Hatazawa, T., 1983, “Contact Between a Sphere and Rough Plates,” Wear, 87(1), pp. 93–105. [CrossRef]
Sellgren, U., Bjorklund, S., and Andersson, S., 2003, “A Finite Element-Based Model of Normal Contact Between Rough Surfaces,” Wear, 254(11), pp. 1180–1188. [CrossRef]
Bahrami, M., Yovanovich, M. M., and Culham, J. R., 2005, “A Compact Model for Spherical Rough Contacts,” ASME J. Tribol., 127(4), pp. 884–889. [CrossRef]
Jamari, J., and Schipper, D. J., 2007, “Deformation Due to Contact Between a Rough Surface and a Smooth Ball,” Wear, 262(1–2), pp. 138–145. [CrossRef]
Wang, S., 2007, “Development of Theoretical Contact Width Formulas and a Numerical Model for Curved Rough Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 129(4), pp. 735–742. [CrossRef]
Carbone, G., and Bottiglione, F., 2008, “Asperity Contact Theories: Do They Predict Linearity Between Contact Area and Load?” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 56(8), pp. 2555–2572. [CrossRef]
Li, L., Etsion, I., and Talke, F. E., 2010, “Elastic–Plastic Spherical Contact Modeling Including Roughness Effects,” Tribol. Lett., 40(3), pp. 357–363. [CrossRef]
Mikic, B. B., and Roca, R. T., 1974, “Solution to Contact of 2 Rough Spherical Surfaces,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 41(3), pp. 801–803. [CrossRef]
Cohen, D., Kligerman, Y., and Etsion, I., 2009, “The Effect of Surface Roughness on Static Friction and Junction Growth of an Elastic–Plastic Spherical Contact,” ASME J. Tribol., 131(2), p. 021404. [CrossRef]
Kogut, L., and Etsion, I., 2000, “The Contact of a Compliant Curved and a Nominally Flat Rough Surfaces,” Tribol. Trans., 43(3), pp. 507–513. [CrossRef]
Gelinck, E. R. M., and Schipper, D. J., 2000, “Calculation of Stribeck Curves for Line Contacts,” Tribol. Int., 33(3–4), pp. 175–181. [CrossRef]
Lu, X. B., Khonsari, M. M., and Gelinck, E. R. M., 2006, “The Stribeck Curve: Experimental Results and Theoretical Prediction,” ASME J. Tribol., 128(4), pp. 789–794. [CrossRef]
Akbarzadeh, S., and Khonsari, M. M., 2008, “Performance of Spur Gears Considering Surface Roughness and Shear Thinning Lubricant,” ASME J. Tribol., 130(2), p. 021503. [CrossRef]
Beheshti, A., and Khonsari, M. M., 2013, “An Engineering Approach for the Prediction of Wear in Mixed Lubricated Contacts,” Wear, 308(1), pp. 121–131. [CrossRef]
Etsion, I., Ovcharenko, A., Halperin, G., and Verberne, G., 2007, “In Situ Investigation of the Contact Area in Elastic–Plastic Spherical Contact During Loading–Unloading,” Tribol. Lett., 25(2), pp. 153–160. [CrossRef]
Hamrock, B. J., and Brewe, D., 1983, “Simplified Solution for Stresses and Deformations,” ASME J. Tribol., 105(2), pp. 171–177.
Hamrock, B. J., 1994, Fundamentals of Fluid Film Lubrication, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Hamrock, B. J., and Dowson, D., 1976, “Isothermal Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Point Contacts. 1. Theoretical Formulation,” ASME J. Tribol., 98(2), pp. 223–228. [CrossRef]
Hamrock, B. J., and Dowson, D., 1976, “Isothermal Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Point Contacts. 2. Ellipticity Parameter Results,” ASME J. Tribol., 98(3), pp. 375–383. [CrossRef]
Johnson, K. L., Greenwood, J. A., and Poon, S. Y., 1972, “Simple Theory of Asperity Contact in Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication,” Wear, 19(1), pp. 91–108. [CrossRef]
Timoshenko, S., and Goodier, J. N., 1970, Theory of Elasticity, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Venner, C. H., 1991, “Multilevel Solution of the EHL Line and Point Contact Problems,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Brizmer, V., Kligerman, Y., and Etsion, I., 2006, “The Effect of Contact Conditions and Material Properties on the Elasticity Terminus of a Spherical Contact,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 43(18–19), pp. 5736–5749. [CrossRef]
Brizmer, V., Zait, Y., Kligerman, Y., and Etsion, I., 2006, “The Effect of Contact Conditions and Material Properties on Elastic–Plastic Spherical Contact,” J. Mech. Mater. Struct., 1(5), pp. 865–879. [CrossRef]
Kagami, J., Yamada, K., and Hatazawa, T., 1986, “Contact Width and Compliance Between Cylinders and Rough Plates,” Wear, 113(3), pp. 353–370. [CrossRef]
Yeo, C. D., Katta, R. R., and Polycarpou, A. A., 2009, “Improved Elastic Contact Model Accounting for Asperity and Bulk Substrate Deformation,” Tribol. Lett., 35(3), pp. 191–203. [CrossRef]
Jackson, R. L., and Green, I., 2011, “On the Modeling of Elastic Contact Between Rough Surfaces,” Tribol. Trans., 54(2), pp. 300–314. [CrossRef]
McCool, J. I., 1987, “Relating Profile Instrument Measurements to the Functional Performance of Rough Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 109(2), pp. 264–270. [CrossRef]
Bush, A. W., Gibson, R. D., and Keogh, G. P., 1976, “Limit of Elastic Deformation in Contact of Rough Surfaces,” Mech. Res. Commun., 3(3), pp. 169–174. [CrossRef]
Chang, W. R., Etsion, I., and Bogy, D. B., 1988, “Static Friction Coefficient Model for Metallic Rough Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 110(1), pp. 57–63. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Elliptical point contact of a rough flat surface and smooth ellipsoid

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Normalized pressure distribution for relatively smooth and rough surfaces at W¯ = 1.5 × 10−4, Γ = 0.0053, Ω = 0.015, and D = 5 (κ = 2.89) based on (a) and (b) GW and (c) and (d) KE and JG models—a¯R and b¯R are the dimensionless contact half length and half width defined in Sec. 4.3.1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Normalized pressure distribution for very rough surface at W¯ = 1.5 × 10−4, Γ = 0.0053, Ω = 0.015, and D = 5 (κ = 2.89) based on (a) GW and (b) KE, and JG models

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Normalized pressure distribution at low and high loads for σ¯ = 1 × 10−4, Γ = 0.0053, Ω = 0.015, D = 5 (κ = 2.89), and ψ = 2.9 based on (a) and (b) GW and (c) and (d) KE and JG models

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Real area of contact for (a) smooth and (b) rough surfaces at Γ = 0.0053, Ω = 0.015, and D = 5 based on Hertzian, GW, KE, and JG models

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Real area of contact based on Hertzian, current simulations and results of Cohen et al. [38]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Contact radius based on Hertzian, current simulations and experimental results of Kagami et al. [30]. (a) Smooth steel ball on rough copper plate and (b) smooth steel ball on rough steel plate B.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Contact compliance based on Hertzian, current simulations and experimental results of Kagami et al. [30]. (a) Smooth steel ball on rough copper plate and (b) smooth steel ball on rough steel plate A.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Contact compliance based on Hertzian, current simulations and results of Li et al. [36] (σ¯ = 3.9 × 10−4, β¯ = 2.18 × 10−2, ψ = 5)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Total deformation (compliance), asperity deformation and bulk deformation at the center of the contact as a function of applied load for Ω = 0.015 and D = 5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Pressure profile based on the numerical calculation and approximated pressure distribution function (a) XZ plane and (b) YZ plane

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In