0
Research Papers

Bending Instability of a General Cross Section Thin-Wall Tube for Minimal Radius of Curvature Passage

[+] Author and Article Information
Hadas Ziso

Robotics Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Technion,
Haifa 32000, Israel
e-mail: hadasz@tx.technion.ac.il

Moshe Shoham

Fellow ASME
Tamara and Harry Handelsman Academic Chair
US National Academy of Engineering
Foreign Member, Robotics Laboratory Director,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Technion,
Haifa 32000, Israel
e-mail: shoham@technion.ac.il

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Applied Mechanics Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS. Manuscript received May 28, 2014; final manuscript received August 6, 2014; accepted manuscript posted August 8, 2014; published online August 27, 2014. Assoc. Editor: George Kardomateas.

J. Appl. Mech 81(10), 101008 (Aug 27, 2014) (7 pages) Paper No: JAM-14-1232; doi: 10.1115/1.4028220 History: Received May 28, 2014; Revised August 06, 2014; Accepted August 08, 2014

This paper describes an analytical tool for the design of thin-wall tubes for passage through minimal radius of curvature trajectory. The design is based on a model of thin-wall tube buckling under pure bending. An extended analytical solution for general initial cross section is found based on Brazier method by energy theory of elastic stability. The model predicts the critical moment, curvature, flattening, and stress and allows choosing the most suitable cross section shape for a specific purpose. For example, tubes with ocular and rounded-ocular cross sections were found suitable for semiflexible applications such as endoscopy, where they elastically cross a sharp corner.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Karamanos, S. A., 2002, “Bending Instabilities of Elastic Tubes,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 39(8), pp. 2059–2085. [CrossRef]
Kempner, J., and Chen, Y. N., 1974, “Buckling and Initial Postbuckling of Oval Cylindrical Shells Under Combined Axial Compression and Bending,” Trans. N. Y. Acad., Sci., 36(II), pp. 171–191. [CrossRef]
Vaziri, A., 2009, “Mechanics of Highly Deformed Elastic Shells,” Thin-Walled Struct., 47(6-7), pp. 692–700. [CrossRef]
Brazier, L. G., 1927, “On the Flexure of Thin Cylindrical Shells and Other ‘Thin Sections,” Proc. R. S. London A, 116(773), pp. 104–114. [CrossRef]
Reissner, E., 1959, “On Finite Bending of Pressurized Tubes,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 26, pp. 386–392.
Fabian, O., 1977, “Collapse of Cylindrical, Elastic Tubes Under Combined Bending, Pressure and Axial Loads,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 13(12), pp. 1257–1270. [CrossRef]
Calladine, C. R., 1983, Theory of Shell Structures, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK, Chap. 16.
Tatting, B. F., and Gurdal, Z., 1997, “The Brazier Effect for Finite Length Composite Cylinders Under Bending,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 34(12), pp. 1419–1440. [CrossRef]
Li, L. Y., 1996, “Bending Instability of Composite Tubes,” J. Aerosp. Eng., 9(2), pp. 58–61. [CrossRef]
Li, L. Y., and Kettle, R., 2002, “Nonlinear Bending Response and Buckling of Ring-Stiffened Cylindrical Shells Under Pure Bending,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 39(3), pp. 765–781. [CrossRef]
Guarracino, F., 2003, “On the Analysis of Cylindrical Tubes Under Flexure: Theoretical Formulations, Experimental Data and Finite Element Analyses,” Thin-Walled Struct., 41(2–3), pp. 127–147. [CrossRef]
Firer, M., and Sheinman, I., 1995, “Nonlinear Analysis of Laminated Noncircular Cylindrical Shells,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 32(10), pp. 1405–1416. [CrossRef]
Hutchinson, J. W., 1968, “Buckling and Initial Postbuckling Behavior of Oval Cylindrical Shells Under Axial Compression,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 35(1), pp. 66–72. [CrossRef]
Zheleznov, L. P., and Kabanov, V. V., 2002, “Nonlinear Deformation and Stability of Noncircular Cylindrical Shells Under Internal Pressure and Axial Compression,” ASME J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys., 43(4), pp. 617–621. [CrossRef]
Volpe, V., Chen, Y. N., and Kempner, J., 1980, “Buckling of Orthogonally Stiffened Finite Oval Cylindrical Shells Under Axial Compression,” AIAA J., 18(5), pp. 571–580. [CrossRef]
Tang, S. C., Chu, C. C., and Yeung, K. S., 1985, “Collapse of Long, Noncircular, Cylindrical Shells Under Pure Bending,” Comput. Struct., 21(6), pp. 1345–1353. [CrossRef]
Corona, E., and Kyriakuxs, S., 1988, “On the Collapse of Inelastic Tubes Under Combined Bending and Pressure,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 24(5), pp. 505–535. [CrossRef]
Brush, D. O., and Almroth, B. O., 1975, Buckling of Bars, Plates and Shells, Int. Student ed., McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, Chap. 5.
Simitses, G. J., 1986, An Introduction to the Elastic Stability of Structures, Reprint ed., Krieger, Malabar, FL, Chap. 1.
Ventsel, E., and Krauthammer, T., 2001, Thin Plates and Shells: Theory, Analysis, and Applications, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
Houliara, S., and Karamanos, S. A., 2006, “Buckling and Post-Buckling of Long Pressurized Elastic Thin-Walled Tubes Under In-Plane Bending,” Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 41(4), pp. 491–511. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) A common endoscope with a fixed, low curvature joint (arrow). (b) Our mechanism as a part of an endoscopic device with high curvature, “floating” joint.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The process of thin-wall tube buckling as a result of pure bending moment. The solid line represents the primary equilibrium path; the dashed line—secondary equilibrium path. Point 1: initial state with no external moment; point 2: beginning of ovalization as a result of pure moment; point 3: bifurcation point, in which the secondary equilibrium path will be followed if buckling as a result of compression occurs; point 4: ovalization critical point, where the tube becomes unstable and snaps to point 5 (dashed arrow).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The general cross section shape, represented by a(θ)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The moment as a function of curvature (normalized) of an initially circular cross section shape solved in four different methods

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Different initial cross section shapes (solid line) and the flattened shapes in the critical state (dashed line). (a) Oval shape, (b) elliptic shape, (c) ocular shape, and (d) rounded-ocular shape.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The moment as a function of curvature (normalized) for different initial cross section shapes solved in Extended Brazier method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The moment as a function of curvature (normalized) for oval initial cross section shape solved in Extended Brazier method and numerically by Houliara

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In