0
Research Papers

Elastodynamic Interaction of Two Offset Interfacial Cracks in Bonded Dissimilar Media With a Functionally Graded Interlayer Under Antiplane Shear Impact

[+] Author and Article Information
Hyung Jip Choi

School of Mechanical Systems Engineering,
Kookmin University,
Seoul 136-702, Republic of Korea
e-mail: hjchoi@kookmin.ac.kr

Manuscript received January 17, 2014; final manuscript received May 3, 2014; accepted manuscript posted May 7, 2014; published online May 20, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Glaucio H. Paulino.

J. Appl. Mech 81(8), 081008 (May 20, 2014) (10 pages) Paper No: JAM-14-1041; doi: 10.1115/1.4027608 History: Received January 17, 2014; Accepted March 07, 2014; Revised May 03, 2014

The impact response of bonded media with a functionally graded interlayer weakened by a pair of two offset interfacial cracks is investigated under the condition of antiplane deformation. The material nonhomogeneity in the graded interlayer is represented in terms of power-law variations of shear modulus and mass density between the dissimilar, homogeneous half-planes. Laplace and Fourier integral transforms are employed to reduce the crack problem to solving a system of Cauchy-type singular integral equations in the Laplace domain. The crack-tip behavior in the physical domain is recovered through the inverse Laplace transform to evaluate the dynamic mode III stress intensity factors as a function of time. As a result, the transient interaction of the offset interfacial cracks spaced apart by the graded interlayer is illustrated. The peak values of the dynamic stress intensity factors are also presented versus offset crack distance, elaborating the effects of various material and geometric parameters of the bonded system on the overshoot characteristics of the transient behavior in the near-tip regions, owing to the impact-induced interaction of singular stress fields between the two cracks.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Miyamoto, Y., Kaysser, W. A., Rabin, B. H., Kawasaki, A., and Ford, R. G., eds., 1999, Functionally Graded Materials: Design, Processing, and Applications, Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA.
Erdogan, F., 1995, “Fracture Mechanics of Functionally Graded Materials,” Compos. Eng., 5(7), pp. 753–770. [CrossRef]
Paulino, G. H., Jin, Z.-H., and Dodds, Jr., R. H., 2003, “Failure of Functionally Graded Materials,” Comprehensive Structural Integrity, Fundamental Theories and Mechanisms of Failure, Vol. 2, B.Karihaloo, and W. G.Knauss, eds., Elsevier, Oxford, UK, pp. 607–644.
Sih, G. C., and Chen, E. P., 1981, “Dynamic Response of Dissimilar Materials With Cracks,” Mechanics of Fracture, Cracks in Composite Materials, Vol. 6, G. C.Sih, ed., Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 277–440.
Babaei, R., and Lukasiewicz, S. A., 1998, “Dynamic Response of a Crack in a Functionally Graded Material Between Two Dissimilar Half Planes Under Anti-Plane Shear Impact Load,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 60(4), pp. 479–487. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Ch., Sladek, J., and Sladek, V., 2003, “Effects of Material Gradients on Transient Dynamic Mode-III Stress Intensity Factors in a FGM,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 40(20), pp. 5251–5270. [CrossRef]
Matbuly, M. S., 2008, “Stress Wave Scattering Induced by a Mode III Interfacial Crack in Nonhomogeneous Strips,” Acta Mech., 199(1-4), pp. 217–226. [CrossRef]
Gharbi, M., El-Borgi, S., and Chafra, M., 2011, “A Surface Crack in a Graded Coating Bonded to a Homogeneous Substrate Under Dynamic Loading Conditions,” Int. J. Eng. Sci., 49(7), pp. 677–693. [CrossRef]
Li, C., Duan, Z., and Zou, Z., 2002, “Torsional Impact Response of a Penny-Shaped Interface Crack in Bonded Materials With a Graded Material Interlayer,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 69(3), pp. 303–308. [CrossRef]
Kim, S., and Choi, H. J., 2004, “Elastodynamic Response of a Crack Perpendicular to the Graded Interfacial Zone in Bonded Dissimilar Materials Under Antiplane Shear Impact,” J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 18(8), pp. 1375–1387. [CrossRef]
Choi, H. J., 2006, “Elastodynamic Analysis of a Crack at an Arbitrary Angle to the Graded Interfacial Zone in Bonded Half-Planes Under Antiplane Shear Impact,” Mech. Res. Commun., 33(5), pp. 636–650. [CrossRef]
Choi, H. J., 2004, “Impact Response of a Surface Crack in a Coating/Substrate System With a Functionally Graded Interlayer: Antiplane Deformation,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 41(20), pp. 5631–5645. [CrossRef]
Choi, H. J., 2007, “Impact Behavior of an Inclined Edge Crack in a Layered Medium With a Graded Nonhomogeneous Interfacial Zone: Antiplane Deformation,” Acta Mech., 193(1-2), pp. 67–84. [CrossRef]
Gao, X.-X., Wang, Y.-S., and Huang, G.-Y., 2006, “The Anti-Plane Dynamic Fracture Analysis of Functionally Graded Materials With Arbitrary Spatial Variations of Material Properties,” Arch. Appl. Mech., 76(3-4), pp. 159–170. [CrossRef]
Ma, L., Wu, L.-Z., and Guo, L.-C., 2002, “Dynamic Behavior of Two Collinear Anti-Plane Shear Cracks in a Functionally Graded Layer Bonded to Dissimilar Half Planes,” Mech. Res. Commun., 29(4), pp. 207–215. [CrossRef]
Ma, L., Wu, L.-Z., and Zhou, Z.-G., 2004, “Dynamic Stress Intensity Factors Around Two Parallel Cracks in a Functionally Graded Layer Bonded to Dissimilar Half-Planes Subjected to Anti-Plane Incident Harmonic Stress Waves,” Int. J. Eng. Sci., 42(2), pp. 187–202. [CrossRef]
Wang, B. L., and Mai, Y.-W., 2006, “Periodic Antiplane Cracks in Graded Coatings Under Static or Transient Loading,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 73(1), pp. 134–142. [CrossRef]
Wang, B. L., and Mai, Y.-W., 2006, “A Periodic Array of Cracks in Functionally Graded Materials Subjected to Transient Loading,” Int. J. Eng. Sci., 44(5-6), pp. 351–364. [CrossRef]
Bagheri, R., Ayatollahi, M., and Asadi, E., 2013, “Dynamic Fracture Analysis of Multiple Defects in an Imperfect FGM Coating-Substrate Layers,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 75, pp. 55–65. [CrossRef]
Itou, S., 2010, “Dynamic Stress Intensity Factors for Two Parallel Interface Cracks Between a Nonhomogeneous Bonding Layer and Two Dissimilar Elastic Half-Planes Subject to an Impact Load,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 47(16), pp. 2155–2163. [CrossRef]
ASME, 2013, “Section XI—Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components,” Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
Lam, K. Y., and Phua, S. P., 1991, “Multiple Crack Interaction and Its Effect on Stress Intensity Factor,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 40(3), pp. 585–592. [CrossRef]
Han, X., Ellyin, F., and Xia, Z., 2002, “Interaction Among Interface, Multiple Cracks and Dislocations,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 39(6), pp. 1575–1590. [CrossRef]
Kachanov, M., 2003, “On the Problems of Crack Interactions and Crack Coalescence,” Int. J. Fract., 120(3), pp. 537–543. [CrossRef]
Kamaya, M., Miyokawa, E., and Kikuchi, M., 2010, “Growth Prediction of Two Interacting Surface Cracks of Dissimilar Sizes,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 77(16), pp. 3120–3131. [CrossRef]
Soboyejo, W. O., and Knott, J. F., 1991, “The Propagation of Non-Coplanar Semi-Elliptical Fatigue Cracks,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 14(1), pp. 37–49. [CrossRef]
Tu, S.-T., and Dai, S.-H., 1994, “An Engineering Assessment of Fatigue Crack Growth of Irregularly Oriented Multiple Cracks,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 17(10), pp. 1235–1246. [CrossRef]
Wang, Y.-Z., Atkinson, J. D., Akid, R., and Parkins, R. N., 1996, “Crack Interaction, Coalescence and Mixed Mode Fracture Mechanics,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 19(4), pp. 427–439. [CrossRef]
Yates, J. R., Zanganeh, M., Tomlinson, R. A., Brown, M. W., and Diaz Garrido, F. A., 2008, “Crack Paths Under Mixed Mode Loading,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 75(3-4), pp. 319–330. [CrossRef]
Choi, H. J., 2012, “Interaction of Two Offset Interfacial Cracks in Bonded Dissimilar Media With a Functionally Graded Interlayer: Antiplane Deformation,” Mech. Res. Commun., 45, pp. 7–14. [CrossRef]
Choi, H. J., 2013, “Mixed-Mode Interaction of Two Offset Interfacial Cracks in Bonded Dissimilar Half-Planes With a Functionally Graded Interlayer,” Mech. Mater., 64, pp. 44–55. [CrossRef]
Chiu, T.-C., and Erdogan, F., 1999, “One-Dimensional Wave Propagation in a Functionally Graded Elastic Medium,” J. Sound Vib., 222(3), pp. 453–487. [CrossRef]
Churchill, R. V., 1981, Operational Mathematics, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Muskhelishvili, N. I., 1992, Singular Integral Equations, Dover, New York.
Gradshteyn, I. S., and Ryzhik, I. M., 2000, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 6th ed., Academic, New York.
Erdogan, F., 1978, “Mixed Boundary Value Problems in Mechanics,” Mechanics Today, Vol. 4, S.Nemat-Nasser, ed., Pergamon, New York, pp. 1–86.
Stehfest, H., 1970, “Algorithm 368: Numerical Inversion of Laplace Transforms,” Commun. Assoc. Comput. Mach., 13(1), pp. 47–49. [CrossRef]
Davies, B., and Martin, B., 1979, “Numerical Inversion of the Laplace Transform: A Survey and Comparison of Methods,” J. Comput. Phys., 33(1), pp. 1–32. [CrossRef]
Ang, W. T., 1988, “A Crack in an Anisotropic Layered Material Under the Action of Impact Loading,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 55(1), pp. 120–125. [CrossRef]
Sutradhar, A., and Paulino, G. H., 2004, “The Simple Boundary Element Method for Transient Heat Conduction in Functionally Graded Materials,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 193(42-44), pp. 4511–4539. [CrossRef]
Davis, P. J., and Rabinowitz, P., 1984, Methods of Numerical Integration, 2nd ed., Academic, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Schematic of the crack problem for bonded dissimilar half-planes with a functionally graded interlayer; (b) distributions of material properties

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Variations of dynamic stress intensity factors: (a) KUinner(t)/Ko; (b) KLinner(t)/Ko as a function of nondimensional time cst/a for different combinations of (μ1μ3, ρ1/ρ3) and Γ = (a + b)/(e + a + b) = 0.1 where h/a=0.5, b/a = 1.0, and Ko = τoa1/2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Variations of dynamic stress intensity factors: (a) KUinner(t)/Ko; (b) KUouter(t)/Ko; (c) KLouter(t)/Ko; and (d) KLinner(t)/Ko as a function of nondimensional time cst/a for different combinations of (μ1/μ3, ρ1/ρ3) and Γ = (a + b)/(e + a + b) = 0.5 where h/a=0.5, b/a = 1.0, and Ko = τoa1/2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Variations of dynamic stress intensity factors: (a) KU(t)/Ko; (b) KL(t)/Ko as a function of nondimensional time cst/a for different combinations of (μ1/μ3, ρ1/ρ3) and Γ = (a + b)/(e + a + b) = 1.0 where h/a=0.5, b/a = 1.0, and Ko = τoa1/2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Peak values of dynamic stress intensity factors: (a) [KUinner]peak/Ko; (b) [KUouter]peak/Ko; (c) [KLouter]peak/Ko; and (d) [KLinner]peak/Ko versus Γ = (a + b)/(e + a + b) for different combinations of (μ1/μ3, ρ1/ρ3) where h/a=0.5, b/a = 1.0, and Ko = τoa1/2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Peak values of dynamic stress intensity factors: (a) [KUinner]peak/Ko; (b) [KUouter]peak/Ko; (c) [KLouter]peak/Ko; and (d) [KLinner]peak/Ko versus Γ = (a + b)/(e + a + b) for different combinations of (μ1/μ3, h/a) where ρ1/ρ3=1.0, b/a = 1.0, and Ko = τoa1/2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Peak values of dynamic stress intensity factors: (a) [KUinner]peak/Ko; (b) [KUouter]peak/Ko; (c) [KLouter]peak/Ko; and (d) [KLinner]peak/Ko versus Γ = (a + b)/(e + a + b) for different combinations of (μ1/μ3, b/a) where ρ1/ρ3 = 1.0, h/a=0.5, and Ko = τoa1/2

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In