Research Papers

Unit Impulse Response Estimation for Structural Damage Detection Under Planar Multiple Excitations

[+] Author and Article Information
Siu-seong Law

e-mail: cesslaw@polyu.edu.hk

Jian-fu Lin

Research Assistant
Department of Civil and
Environmental Engineering,
Hong Kong Polytechnic University,
Hunghom, Kowloon,
Hong Kong, China

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received August 24, 2012; final manuscript received August 29, 2013; accepted manuscript posted September 3, 2013; published online October 16, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Alexander F. Vakakis.

J. Appl. Mech 81(2), 021015 (Oct 16, 2013) (15 pages) Paper No: JAM-12-1414; doi: 10.1115/1.4025320 History: Received August 24, 2012; Revised August 29, 2013; Accepted September 03, 2013

An unit impulse response (UIR) function is an inherent system function that depends only on the structure and the locations of excitation. When the structure is under general excitation, the effect can be obtained via Duhamel integral between the UIR function and the excitation. The possibility of the UIR function as a damage detection index under general excitation is studied here. However, the UIRs from multiple excitations will contribute to the identification equation together. Therefore, the estimation of UIRs will most probably become underdetermined with a limited number of measurements leading to an incorrect or nonfeasible solution of the inverse problem. This report addresses this problem by developing a transformation between the UIRs to facilitate the conversion of a multiple excitations problem into an equivalent single excitation problem. However, the method is limited to planar problems and the reference response is confined to those with larger vibration amplitude. The extraction of the UIR via Tikhonov regularization from the measured acceleration is then described. Numerical studies with a 31-bar plane truss structure are used to illustrate the performances of the proposed approach with different damage scenarios with or without noise effect and model errors. The stability of the UIR estimation with different periods of measured data is also studied. Moreover, this paper studies the effect of using a reduced number of sensors and an increased sampling rate. Results show that the regularization-based approach with the new transformation matrix is accurate and effective for the inverse solution and it is robust to measurement noise in the damage detection process.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Sohn, H., Farrar, C. R., Hemez, F., and Czarnecki, J., 2002, “A Review of Structure Health Monitoring Literature 1996–2001,” Los Alamos National Lab., Rept. LA-UR-02-2095, Los Alamos, NM.
Cattarius, J., and Inman, D. J., 1997, “Time Domain Analysis for Damage Detection in Smart Structures,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 1(3), pp. 409–423. [CrossRef]
Choi, S., and Stubbs, N., 2004, “Damage Identification in Structures Using the Time-Domain Response,” J. Sound Vib., 275(3–5), pp. 577–590. [CrossRef]
Lu, Y., and Gao, F., 2005, “A Novel Time-Domain Auto-Regressive Model for Structural Damage Diagnosis,” J. Sound Vib., 283(3–5), pp. 1031–1049. [CrossRef]
Kang, J. S., Park, S. K., Shin, S., and Lee, H. S., 2005, “Structural System Identification in Time Measured Acceleration,” J. Sound Vib., 288(1–2), pp. 215–234. [CrossRef]
Law, S. S., Li, X. Y., Zhu, X. Q., and Chan, S. L., 2005, “Structural Damage Detection From Wavelet Packet Sensitivity,” Eng. Struct., 27(9), pp. 1339–1348. [CrossRef]
Law, S. S., and Li, X. Y., 2006, “Structural Damage Detection From Wavelet Coefficient Sensitivity With Model Errors,” J. Eng. Mech., 132(10), pp. 1077–1087. [CrossRef]
Peters, B., 2000, “System Identification and Damage Detection in Civil Engineering,” Ph.D. dissertation, Civil Engineering Department, K. U. Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Li, X. Y., and Law, S. S., 2008, “Condition Assessment of Structures Under Ambient White Noise Excitation,” AIAA J., 46(6), pp. 1395–1404. [CrossRef]
Li, X. Y., and Law, S. S., 2010, “Matrix of the Covariance of Covariance of Acceleration Responses for Damage Detection From Ambient Vibration Measurements,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 24, pp. 945–956. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Q., Jankowski, L., and Duan, Z., 2012, “Simultaneous Identification of Excitation Time Histories and Parametrized Structural Damages,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 33, pp. 56–68. [CrossRef]
Law, S. S., and Li, X. Y., 2007, “Wavelet-Based Sensitivity of Impulse Response Function for Damage Detection,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 74(2), pp. 375–377. [CrossRef]
Robertson, A. N., Park, K. C., and Alvin, K. F., 1998, “Extraction of Impulse Response Data Via Wavelet Transform for Structural System Identification,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 120, pp. 252–260. [CrossRef]
Robertson, A. N., Park, K. C., and Alvin, K. F., 1998, “Identification of Structural Dynamics Models Using Wavelet-Generated Impulse Response Data,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 120, pp. 261–266. [CrossRef]
Law, S. S., and Li, X. Y., 2008, “Structural Damage Detection With Statistical Analysis From Support Excitation,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 22, pp. 1793–1808. [CrossRef]
Juang, J. N., 1985, “An Eigensystem Realization Algorithm for Modal Parameters Identification and Model Reduction,” J. Guidance Control Dyn., 8(5), pp. 583–592. [CrossRef]
Tikhonov, A. N., 1995, Numerical Methods for the Solution of Ill-Posed Problems, Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.
Li, X. Y., and Law, S. S., 2010, “Adaptive Tikhonov Regularization for Damage Detection Based on Nonlinear Model Updating,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 24, pp. 1646–1664. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Thirty-one planar truss structure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Two sets of seismic excitation data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison of estimated UIR at nodes 5 and 12 with 5% noise

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Stability check in different time periods

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Identified results without and with noise using different time periods

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of averaged identified results under difference noise levels

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Averaged identified results under a different level of noise and model error

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Averaged identified results using five sensors with 5% noise

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

A space steel cantilever mast structure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Unit impulse acceleration response excited in two perpendicularly horizontal directions




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In